tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4736368792627492483.post4477211851185490926..comments2023-07-15T06:36:14.836-07:00Comments on Coston's Complaint: Ron Paul's Libtard Iranian PolicyUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4736368792627492483.post-17990255084686406872011-08-17T20:22:28.295-07:002011-08-17T20:22:28.295-07:00There's nothing Liberal about Ron Paul. And hi...There's nothing Liberal about Ron Paul. And his foreign policy is based in the CLASSICAL CONSERVATIVE theory of ISOLATIONISM. INTERVENTION is what the LIBERALS tended to do: WWI (Wilson), WWII (FDR), Korea (Truman), Vietnam (JFK/LBJ)... And EVERY TIME there were Conservtaives opposing them, preaching Isolationism. The roles have reversed soemwhat, but isolationism is still YOUR DEAL. Libs will still intervene, just for different reasons. And while the anti-war crowd to be Liberal, far from all Liberals are anti-war. (I, for one, supported Afghanistan wholehearted and continue to. All the same, Iraq was a policy of deceitful and moronic Lunacy and I've yet to hear any reasonable case otherwise.)<br /><br />But you people tend to have aknee-jerk reaction to CHEERLEAD ALL wars, which is just absurd. (Look at Iraq! Still cheerleading that?!) Hey: I think Ron Paul's a bit of a nut too, but you guys still own him, and WE DON'T WANT HIM. He's YOURS, make no mistake about it.<br /><br />BTW... "Libtard?" Reveals you to be three things: (1) Conservtaive. (2) An Idealouge. And (3) Kind of stupid, actually. If you're going to use snarky names, at least create a few original ones. Just sayin'.Niceguy Eddiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03896896323840121445noreply@blogger.com