Sharia Law and the United States

Newt Gingrich gave a speech at the American Enterprise Institute where he addressed the problem of Islam. He wants to pass a federal law that would in essence ban the practice of Sharia Law in the United States.



A dialogue is starting to take place. The scales are dropping from our eyes and we are beginning to see the true nature of Islam; it is a political ideologue in the guise of a religion. We in the West believe that all religions are peaceful; and because of this basic understanding we’ve allowed ourselves to be deceived.

Mohammed was a warlord. He used deception to conquer his enemies; and encouraged his followers to practice this art of warfare until all peoples have submitted to the will of HIS God. One of the symbols of conquest is a Mosque. We are now engaged in a struggle against just such a symbol at ground zero:




People try to distinguish between moderate and radical Muslims. I say there can be no distinction. Anyone who freely follows Mohammed is not a moderate whatsoever. As far as I’m concerned Mohammed was a megalomaniac who catered to the base needs of his followers for his own personal glory. You have to ask yourself, would God elevate this man as an equal to Jesus Christ? Jesus Christ was a man of peace; Mohammed wasn’t. If anything Mohammed was the original anti-Christ.

We now have Diasporas in the United States that are trying to implement Sharia as we speak. The recent arrest of Christians handing out pamphlets on the streets of Dearborn, Michigan is just one recent example. We must not allow this insidious ideologue to take hold on our soil. So what are we to do? We Americans do have precedence.

At the end of the American Revolutionary War, the Loyalist packed up their bags and left. They did not stay behind; the few who did accepted their new found country and assimilated.

President Andrew Jackson removed the American Indian from their lands in the southern states because of national security issues. The following excerpts are from Robert V. Remini’s biography The Life of Andrew Jackson:

Andrew Jackson was motivated principally by two considerations: first, his concern for the military safety of the United States, which dictated that Indians must not occupy areas that might jeopardize the defense of this nation; and second, his commitment to the principle that all persons residing within states are subject to the jurisdiction and laws of those states. Under no circumstances did Indian tribes constitute sovereign entities when they occupied territory within existing state boundaries.

Mr. Remini also writes:

Jackson’s commitment to the principle of removal resulted primarily from his concern for the integrity and safety of the American nation. It was not greed or racism that motivated him. He was not intent on genocide. He was not involved in a gigantic land grab for the benefit of his Tennessee cronies---or anyone else. After living with the Indian problem for many years and experiencing any number of encounters with the various tribes, friendly and hostile, he came to the unshakeable conclusion that the only policy that benefitted both peoples, white and red, was removal.

And here we are, facing a similar problem but with a different people. American’s will not accept Sharia Law on our soil, and Muslims must follow the mandates of their prophet. We have irreconcilable differences that can only be resolved through assimilation or removal