Many Americans are going to be surprised that we are funding nearly half of the United Nations IPCC’s budget. These scoundrels have been dependent on the American taxpayers for years, and worse, they used our own money to try and subjugate us through their global governance machinations via the global warming scam.
How is it that we’re just now finding out about the funding of this disreputable organization?
How is it that we’re just now finding out about the funding of this disreputable organization?
How it is that Congress (who is constitutionally mandated to control the purse strings) had no idea how much money was going to this organization? CNS reported the following:
After facing “key challenges” in determining the amount of funding to the IPCC, the GAO now recommends that U.S. funding be reported annually to Congress with “accurate and consistent information.”
The report said documents on U.S. financing for the IPCC were “not available in budget documents or on the websites of the relevant federal agencies, and the agencies are generally not required to report this information to Congress.”
Conflicting State Department numbers also made it more difficult for the GAO to assemble the data. The GAO “reviewed documents and interviewed officials from federal agencies and IPCC” to reach its findings.
A 2005 GAO report entitled “Federal Reports on Climate Change Funding Should Be Clearer and More Complete” found that federal funding for climate change was not adequately accountable. “Congress and the public cannot consistently track federal climate change funding or spending over time,” the report concluded.
This is absolutely shameful. No one knows exactly how much money is going to this grand hoax; not even the GAO. This should be an indicator that the federal government is too damn big.
And to add circumspection about the IPCC, here is a brief description of its chairman:
After facing “key challenges” in determining the amount of funding to the IPCC, the GAO now recommends that U.S. funding be reported annually to Congress with “accurate and consistent information.”
The report said documents on U.S. financing for the IPCC were “not available in budget documents or on the websites of the relevant federal agencies, and the agencies are generally not required to report this information to Congress.”
Conflicting State Department numbers also made it more difficult for the GAO to assemble the data. The GAO “reviewed documents and interviewed officials from federal agencies and IPCC” to reach its findings.
A 2005 GAO report entitled “Federal Reports on Climate Change Funding Should Be Clearer and More Complete” found that federal funding for climate change was not adequately accountable. “Congress and the public cannot consistently track federal climate change funding or spending over time,” the report concluded.
This is absolutely shameful. No one knows exactly how much money is going to this grand hoax; not even the GAO. This should be an indicator that the federal government is too damn big.
And to add circumspection about the IPCC, here is a brief description of its chairman:
No one in the world exercised more influence on the events leading up to the Copenhagen conference on global warming than Dr Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and mastermind of its latest report in 2007.
Although Dr Pachauri is often presented as a scientist (he was even once described by the BBC as “the world’s top climate scientist”), as a former railway engineer with a PhD in economics he has no qualifications in climate science at all.
What has also almost entirely escaped attention, however, is how Dr Pachauri has established an astonishing worldwide portfolio of business interests with bodies which have been investing billions of dollars in organisations dependent on the IPCC’s policy recommendations.
These outfits include banks, oil and energy companies and investment funds heavily involved in ‘carbon trading’ and ‘sustainable technologies’, which together make up the fastest-growing commodity market in the world, estimated soon to be worth trillions of dollars a year.
Today, in addition to his role as chairman of the IPCC, Dr Pachauri occupies more than a score of such posts, acting as director or adviser to many of the bodies which play a leading role in what has become known as the international ‘climate industry’.
The chairman of the IPCC should be an indicator of what kind of organization this is. And rest assured it has nothing to do do with the climate.
Source: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/us-funds-nearly-50-31-million-un-s-global-warming-panel
http://informationliberation.com/index.php?id=28333
Source: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/us-funds-nearly-50-31-million-un-s-global-warming-panel
http://informationliberation.com/index.php?id=28333
No comments:
Post a Comment