Tuesday, September 2, 2014

Feds Punish Business for "Citizenship-Discrimination"







We’ve all heard the fictional Republican war on women.  Tell a woman she has to pay for her own damn birth control, suddenly you’re denying her access to health care.  It’s a ridiculous premise.  


What isn’t ridiculous is the Democratic Party’s war on American citizenship.  Illegal aliens are swarming across our borders.  The DOJ, federal judiciary and Democratic politicians are scheming to grant defacto amnesty without the authorization of Congress.  And now, businesses are being sued for verifying the legal status of employees.


A Texas catering business will pay the United States $26,400 for engaging in “citizenship-discrimination,” as part of a settlement with the Justice Department announced Tuesday.

Culinaire International unlawfully discriminated against employees based on their citizenship status, the Justice Department claimed, because it required non-citizen employees to provide extra proof of their right to work in the United States.

Culinaire has agreed to pay the United States $20,460 in civil penalties, receive training in anti-discrimination rules of the Immigration and Nationality Act, revise its work eligibility verification process, and create a $40,000 back pay fund for “potential economic victims.”

“Employers cannot discriminate against workers by requiring them to produce more documents than necessary in the employment eligibility verification and reverification processes,” Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights division, Molly Moran, said in a statement.

A lawful permanent resident’s card expires, but their right to work is permanent, and in this case Culinaire was requiring employees to present a renewed permanent resident card to be verified as work-eligible. The Justice Department claimed this violated a provision in the INA that prohibits employers from requiring extra documentation from non-citizen employees.

So let’s get this straight.  An immigrant’s lawful residency expires, yet they don’t have to renew it and can work in the U.S. indefinitely and with impunity.  Does anyone else have a problem with this?  Didn’t the 9/11 hijackers exploit similar loopholes? 

No comments:

Post a Comment