The science is settled! How many times have we heard that from
consensus grafters? Global warmers refuse
to provide their data, and when they do, their assertions have been refuted. Their whole premise is based on computer models
that have never been right. These same scientists
have stooped so low as to fabricate real temperature data to manipulate world
opinion.
Consensus is not science. The global warming debate will continue as
long as honest brokers aren’t censored.
Even well established theories, like black holes, are disputed to this
day. The News and Observer reported:
CHAPEL HILL — A theoretical physicist at UNC
believes she has found a rather large hole in the popular scientific conception
of the universe.
The university’s press office states flatly
that Dr. Laura Mersini-Houghton has shown that “black holes do not exist,” and
that, as a result, scientists are going to have to “reimagine the fabric of
space-time, but also rethink the origins of the universe.”
Those cosmic claims may be slightly
hyperbolic, but Mersini-Houghton herself believes that her paper published last
week will disrupt our entire understanding of the light-eating, infinitely
dense objects that supposedly haunt the universe. She says black holes likely
can’t exist in the way they’ve been previously conceived.
Her conclusion, in short, is that collapsing
stars should slow their self destruction before they truly become bottomless
gravity well.
If physicist can still debate
the existence of black holes without recriminations can’t climatologist?
Source:
No comments:
Post a Comment