Progressives are quaking in their boots. They are fretting over the possibility that
red states will openly defy President Barack Obama’s executive orders. Here is an excerpt from a Washington Post
libtard who is obviously in high anxiety over such a scenario:
It’s a scary
thought, but here it is: If some red states were to openly defy the authority
of President Obama in the exercise of his constitutional duties, would today’s
Republican Congress side with him? Or would they honor the insurrection?
I wish it could be said with confidence that the legislative
branch would oppose a rebellion against the executive branch of government. But
I’m not so sure.
Last month, the Republican-led Arizona House of Representatives
passed, on a 36-to-24 party-line vote, a bill sponsored
by tea party Rep. Bob Thorpe (R-Flagstaff) that “prohibits this state or any of
its political subdivisions from using any personnel or financial resources to
enforce, administer or cooperate with an executive order issued by the
President of the U.S. that has not been affirmed by a vote of Congress and
signed into law as prescribed by the U.S. Constitution.”
If adopted by the Arizona Senate and signed into law, executive
orders issued by the president would have no force or effect in that state.
What’s more, the Arizona House has passed a number of other bills aimed at
nullifying policies, rules and regulations of the Obama administration that
have not been approved by Congress.
I didn’t know the Constitution allowed for
dictators. I thought we had a federalist
system. Or, is it possible, that today’s
journalist have been brainwashed into thinking a president of the United States
(only liberal ones of course) can do as they damn please and the American
people have to sit back and take it.
I’m sure if a republican president acted like Obama,
this journalist would demand an insurrection and that Congress lead the charge.
No comments:
Post a Comment