I’m having serious reservations about Carly Fiorina’s
candidacy for the republican nomination.
At first, I thought, she was an ideal candidate for taking on the central
government. She’s intelligent, articulate,
prepared, and more importantly, she’s not a D.C. insider. But she has strayed from the issues that are
important to Americans.
Her stance on birthright citizenship is particularly
annoying.
Carly Fiorina said that changing the Constitution to remove birthright
citizenship would not be an efficient way to address immigration reform. There
are more important matters to discuss, she added.
“It would take
passing a constitutional amendment to get that changed. It’s part of our 14th
Amendment. So honestly, I think we should put all of our energies, all of our
political will into finally getting the border secured and fixing the legal
immigration,” she
said.
Fiorina also said
the U.S. should defund sanctuary cities and deport undocumented immigrants who
commit crimes.
I have news for Carly Fiorina. Bastardization of the 14th Amendment
is an important matter. Anchor babies
and forcing States to educate illegal alien children legitimizes this third
world invasion from Latin America. It
undermines our sovereignty and the rule of law.
A president with fortitude and force of personality
can persuade Americans on the forthrightness of his or her actions by pointing
out the abuses of the federal judiciary and particularly the Supreme
Court. If need be, a president must organize
an Article V States convention to rid us of this meddlesome vehicle for
activist judges.
Ms. Fiorina likes to talk about the rule of law, but
what about judicial activism. Will she
abide by unlawful rulings by rogue judges who believe their legislators and not
jurist? Here is her response to the
arrest of a Kentucky clerk who has the audacity to be a Christian.
In a radio interview
on Tuesday, Ms. Fiorina, who has been forceful about the rule of law, said, “Is
she prepared to continue to work for the government, be paid for by the
government, in which case she needs to execute the government’s will, or does
she feel so strongly about this that she wants to sever her employment with the
government and go seek employment elsewhere where her religious liberties would
be paramount over her duties as a government employee?”
Does Ms. Fiorina
understand the basic principles of federalism?
Kathy Davis is not a federal government employee. She was elected by her constituents in a
county in Kentucky. Worse, Ms. Fiorina
doesn’t believe Christians should practice their faith in public life. This is a dangerous sentiment and concedes to
the lawlessness of the Supreme Court and their band of black robed thugs
throughout the federal judiciary.
Ms. Fiorina likes to talk
about the rule of law. Maybe she would be
more convincing if she addressed the lawlessness of the federal government.
Source:
No comments:
Post a Comment