Lip-smacking Marxists crave nothing more than a
great leveling of American society. They’ve
concocted all sorts of half-baked schemes to disenfranchise the citizenry,
except of course, themselves. The most
obvious is global warming scientists fattening their wallets with government
grants by skewing data to reach predetermined results. Government organizations use that research to
promote and enhance an authoritative state.
And so it goes, governmental agencies bribing institutions with cash for
corruption.
Not all scientists and institutions have been
tainted by the federal mafia. There are
principled individuals who’ve questioned and spoken out against this
fraud. We do have watchdogs treeing
these robbers of integrity and treasury.
However, there are more insidious schemes that are harder to tackle; schemes
that are designed to ghettoize America.
Our so-called institutions of higher learning have,
for decades, promoted multiculturalism, not as an American melting pot where
cultures meld into a common weal, but as a tool for contention and tribalism. Progressives have nurtured minority
resentment by emphasizing and exaggerating Western crimes against the third-world. This manifests itself into a sense of
entitlement from the perceived aggrieved and guilt by European ancestry.
This yin and yang of multicultural sophistry has become
a catalyst for denouncing our founding principles of life, liberty, property
and ultimately prosperity. An Obama
appointee for a judgeship in a District Court in Minnesota exemplifies this
dangerous philosophy. Here is an excerpt
from Daniel Horowitz’s article in Conservative Review:
On Tuesday afternoon, Republicans will vote to
confirm Wilhelmina Marie Wright, a sitting member of the Minnesota state
Supreme Court, to the United States District Court for the District of
Minnesota. Just who is Ms. Wright?
Writing a short entry for the UCLA Law Review in
1990 (page 18-19 of PDF),
Ms. Wright brazenly asserted that, “[T]he practice of American racism is based
on two principles: the sanctity of property and the belief in the hierarchy of
races.” She concludes as follows:
The
failure of today’s racial discourse is its reliance on the notion that property
is neutral, that the deed to a suburban home is ‘property’ while the
opportunity to move out of a slum is not. The fungibility of property can be no
better exemplified than it is by slavery. The fact that our Constitution once
recognized one person’s very life and liberty as another’s property should
teach us the danger of letting property determine liberty rather than looking
to liberty to define property.
The original sin of slavery is forever ingrained in
the aggrieved even though not one of these people has experienced the restrains
of a shackle except for the one that strangles their minds and for that they
are willing to destroy every vestige that has been the envy of the world for
over 200 years.
Mr. Horowitz further explains:
If you want to know why every
Democrat-appointed and many GOP-appointed judges believe the Constitution is unconstitutional,
here’s the source. They oppose the fundamental negative rights expressed in our
founding documents, replace them with man-made positive rights for favored
classes, and point to flaws with the settlement of our continent with regard to
slavery as justification for upending the Constitution outside the legitimate
amendment process.
Thus we have special rights for
the aggrieved and second class status for the “inheritors of wealth and prosperity”
which are those who are cursed with white privilege. Let the ghettoization of America begin!
Source:
No comments:
Post a Comment