The Obama administration is scheduled to handover ICANN to the United Nations at the end of this month. This coincides with his plans to fundamentally transform the United States from a sovereign nation to one under global governance. There is no better way to attack an American’s First Amendment right of free speech than to hand the internet over to a body of authoritarians.
Former U.N. ambassador John Bolton predicted the
internet will be fundamentally transformed within ten years. Free speech on the world-wide web will
effectively be killed off.
What they’re talking about is succumbing to the demands of
foreign governments and foreign interests who say, in what is effectively a
global means of communication, it’s just wrong to have the United States in
charge of it.
But the fact is,
under American control, it’s had remarkable growth. It’s been kept free. It’s
been able to withstand a lot of pressure to try and set rules that favor one
side or another. And in an international environment, I can tell you from my
own experience, when you get all kinds of governments from all over the world
setting standards and making decisions, it will be far less free than it is
now.
And I don’t
think the particular kind of transfer we’re talking about now is the end of the
game. This is a black-and-white, binary choice: it’s either under American
control, or it’s not. And once we let go of it, we are never getting it back.
That’s the plan.
Democrats have been bitching about Tea Party activists and an
alternative media that exposes their corruption for over a decade. They want to control the narrative. There is no better way to circumvent the U.S.
Constitution than by having totalitarians in the United Nations do their
bidding. But that’s not the end of
it. Here is what John Bolton predicted
if Hillary Clinton wins the presidency.
That said, I believe that if Hillary Clinton wins, she will do
what I expected Obama to do, which is try to transfer more and more American
sovereignty into international organizations across the range of issues —
whether it’s climate change or the conduct of international affairs. I think
Obama didn’t do as much as I expected in that vein because he really just doesn’t
care about international affairs as much as he cares about ‘fundamentally
transforming’ our country.
I think Hillary
does have even grander ambitions, and so that’s why what we started off, the
end of ICANN or the effective control of ICANN over the Internet, is an
excellent example of global governance replacing American sovereignty in
effect. And I think she’ll be much more on that. I hope that’s something Trump
emphasizes in the upcoming debate.
Barack Obama said as much during his speech to the United
Nations last week.
No comments:
Post a Comment