Sunday, June 4, 2017
Western Civilization Will Be the Next Tower of Babel
Once again, the religion of peace has treated Western civilization to another demonstration of love and understanding. Last night, Londoners were attacked by a band of terrorists, who for some reason, have misinterpreted the prophet Muhammad’s message of tolerance and coexistence. Oh that’s right, I forgot Islam means submit. What am I thinking?
All successful civilizations fall and ours is not immune. A couple of years ago, I watched a documentary on the Tower of Babel. David Rohl demonstrated that this tale could actually be true but not for the reasons told in the Bible. The demise of this ancient culture is a well-worn truism of which we are witnessing today in Europe and the United States.
Secrets of the Bible: Season 1 Episode 11 - The... by ghazwanmattoka
What brought the downfall of this ancient civilization is a massive migration from lesser cultures. These immigrants were attracted to the success and wealth of others. Unfortunately, these foreigners refused to acculturate; hence, the many languages, and without a doubt, the concomitant hostilities that brought down a great city.
What happened to the citizens of this ancient civilization? Well, like most people who’ve had their country invaded by hostile foreigners, they fled. Recently, DNA test were performed on Egyptian mummies. Those tests revealed that the subjects ancestors originated from Mesopotamia and the Anatolian Peninsula. Could they be the descendents of Babel? David Rohl seems to think so and it looks like he may be right.
The tale of the tower of Babel is as relevant today as it is ancient. Rome fell because of a Germanic invasion that brought about the Dark Ages. A third world invasion into Europe and the United States could bring another. The multiculturalists and globalists who deny history are condemning us to repeat it.
Source:
Thursday, June 1, 2017
President Trump Pulls Out of Paris Climate "Accord"
Finally, something newsworthy has broken through the Democratic Party’s media curtain. President Donald Trump has fulfilled a campaign promise by pulling out of this ridiculous Paris global warming accord, and the libtards are having another meltdown. Here’s a federal government grifter calling this an act of treason.
If Trump pulls the US out of the #ParisAgreement he will be committing a traitorous act of war against the American people. My statement:
I’ll tell you what is treasonous and that is having a so-called president ratify a treaty by circumventing the U.S. Constitution. Many will say this “accord” had no enforcement clause. That maybe true, but that won’t stop activist groups using this fake treaty in our courts and imposing their will upon our local communities and businesses.
Barack Obama didn’t have the authority to sign away our sovereignty and birthright to a band of global overlords. That man is a disgrace and I’ll enjoy watching every smidgen of his legacy dismantled right before his eyes.
Russia, Russia, Russia!
Russia, Russia, Russia! I'm beginning to wonder if Jan Brady has become the dark lord of all media. Since the election, a manufactured lie has overtaken the news cycle. Democrats and their propaganda masters want us to believe the Trump administration is infested with Russian operatives. They can’t prove anything, but they persist in this narrative. To be quite honest, I’ve had enough and have tuned out. I can’t even watch Fox News because of this crap.
I recently subscribed to Netflix and a whole new world has opened up to me. I am a documentary fool and this venue is paradise. A couple of nights ago, I watched Liberating a Continent: John Paul II and the Fall of Communism. I swear every documentary I watch on totalitarian regimes the following tactics are employed:
Suppress the Christian faith
Take over schools and indoctrinate children
Attack the family unit
Instill a politically correct environment
Criminalize political foes
Does that sound familiar? It should because Progressives are employing these tactics right here in the United States.
There are plenty of remarkable observations in this documentary, but the one that stood out for me was the Solidarity movement in Poland. The narrator stated the Soviet Union boasted they had created a workers’ paradise. However, the Poles didn’t feel that way; they wanted freedom and self-government.
The narrator commented American socialists couldn’t understand the Solidarity movement. Maybe they would understand it better had they lived under a totalitarian regime.
I will say Pope John Paul II was an amazing man. He understood the insidious nature of socialism/communism. Maybe someone will send a copy of this documentary to the current Vicar of Christ.
Thursday, May 18, 2017
Liberal Culture Examines "Russian Hacked" Emails
The liberal mind is something to behold. I liken this specimen to a maze subsumed with mold and around every corner lurks a racist boogeyman. It’s a hemisphere where logic and reason run into dead end synapses while the spectre of Obvious laughs and mocks its stupidity.
My favorite petri dish is the editorial board at the Charlotte Observer. This culture is a microcosm of a broader groupthink that infest the mainstream media. This specimen published an example of how the board arrived at one of their opinions. The object was James Comey and the hacked DNC emails. Let’s pull out a microscope and examine the contents.
Bailey: “The point is more about guarding ourselves against being unwittingly used by a hostile actor in the future. Russia, through WikiLeaks, purposefully put its stamp on our democracy by helping one side. It did that with a drip drip over the final few weeks, and media went along with that timeline by publishing several individual pieces. We have to ask our industry if we are OK with playing that kind of a role in elections, or is there a way we can think of to still do our jobs well without being used by hackers trying to undermine our democracy.”
Batten: “I have some concerns with the editorial because it suggests that the media ran incorrect or unverified information when I don’t know of it doing so. And it raises questions about the media’s performance not only on Russian leaks but on Comey’s email announcement in late October. What was the media to do about that? Not cover the FBI director announcing the FBI is reopening an investigation into one of the candidates? That would be irresponsible and look like the media is covering for her. No doubt the Russians/Wikileaks savvily trickled things out and the media went along. I can see the media mulling what to do about that. But if they are running true, verified information, I’m not sure how much criticism and second-guessing they deserve.
Notice how they are under the presumption that Russia is Wikileaks source despite denials by Julian Assange. The Observer’s editorial board never contemplated the idea that all those leaks could have been an inside job. As a matter of fact, a murdered DNC staffer shared over 44,000 emails with Wikileaks; but they won’t allow that to disrupt their Russian narrative.
Get a load of this next section. The specimen is worried about being used as a tool.
Bailey: “And that’s the quandary. We are either willing to say we did everything in this well, or that we should rethink things. Our handling of Russia and Comey created an incredible imbalance in the transparency of the two final candidates, which did a disservice to the public, even if none of the news was fake. How does it serve our readers to be an unwitting tool in that kind of process? Are we really OK with saying that’s how things should be going forward?
“On Comey, we had to report, but the way we reported should be rethought. Many of the stories we ran speculated about the impact on the election – with very little context that it did not mean Clinton did anything wrong. In essence, by treating Comey as we did, we did publish unverified info – because those emails were neither new nor relevant. But by the time we found out, the die had been cast.”
Isn’t that precious? The specimen is worried about publishing unverified information. Well apparently they don’t have any qualms publishing stories riddled with unverified and unnamed sources when it comes to President Donald Trump and his administration.
But look at this! The specimen has had a revelation.
Bailey (responding to Batten’s earlier note): “Also, even if we believe media just did its job the way we’ve long believed we should, it still means that we were used by those with ill intent, and it worked. Shouldn’t that bother us? Shouldn’t that convince us to make sure no stone is unturned, even if that means rethinking/revamping how we do what we do? Given the ability of hackers, this issue will only grow larger.”
Can the specimen make the logical leap that it’s being used to derail the Trump administration? I think I see a dead end synapses ahead.
Source:
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/opinion/editorials/article151095762.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)