Speaker Pelosi Proclaims She is an Anti-American Globalist

Democrats should get their asses spanked in the coming general election. This party has proclaimed itself subversive and outright hostile to the rule of law and the American creed.

If you’re a citizen, you should be outraged that Nancy Pelosi and her Marxist horde have practically declared war on American sovereignty. Her press conference was an outright admission that they’re globalist, and they have no regard for any of us.

In order for Americans to reclaim any self-respect, we must relegate the Democratic party to permanent minority status. This smackdown is imperative, to do otherwise is to relegate America into the dustbin of history.

Source:

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/11/pelosi-rejects-u-s-sovereignty-u-s-immigration-subject-to-laws-of-a-global-society/

Democrats Fear Citizenship in Decennial Census

Democrats fear nothing more than Americans rising up and demanding respect. One way to restore respect is to ensure an accurate count in the coming decennial census. We must separate the wheat from the chaff and the only way to do that is invoke citizenship status. If this were to come to pass, congressional districts would be realigned and the Electoral College would be diminished in states where illegal aliens reside. Ultimately, it would mean a loss of power and money for blue state Democrats. And they are fighting back.

Democrats such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez see this as nothing more than voter suppression and nativism. I thought illegal aliens weren’t allowed to vote. And since when is taking pride in citizenship a nativist act? According to AOC, illegal aliens are her constituents. Here is a little exchange between “The Boss” and Secretary Wilbur Ross:

"I'm sorry, I must reclaim my time," Ocasio-Cortez said.

"Mr. Kobach later sent an email to you on July 14, writing that the lack of the citizenship question ‘leads to the problem that aliens who do not actually reside in the United States are still counted for congressional apportionment services,'" she said.

"Of course they do reside in the United States. They reside in my district. They’re my constituents," she said of illegal aliens.

If illegal aliens were excluded from the census, I wonder if AOC would still have a job. Drinks anyone?

Source:

https://freebeacon.com/politics/ocasio-cortez-illegal-aliens-are-my-constituents/


https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/melanie-arter/aoc-asks-commerce-secretary-why-feds-are-violating-law-include

Homeland Security Grants Citizenship to Persons of "Special Interest"

Hats off, once again, to the Department of Homeland Security where security is merely a suggestion.  What is the latest outrage?  Read the following;

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. government has mistakenly granted citizenship to at least 858 immigrants from countries of concern to national security or with high rates of immigration fraud who had pending deportation orders, according to an internal Homeland Security audit released Monday.

The Homeland Security Department's inspector general found that the immigrants used different names or birthdates to apply for citizenship with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and such discrepancies weren't caught because their fingerprints were missing from government databases.

I bet the Obama administration made sure these “special interest” individuals pledged allegiance to the Democratic Party before unleashing them onto the American people.

Source:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/more-800-immigrants-mistakenly-granted-citizenship-130452164--politics.html

Ted Cruz More of a Natural Born Citizen Than Obama

I contended back in the early stages of Barack Obama’s presidency that he was not a natural born citizen.  A natural born citizen has nothing to do with ones place of birth, but rather the condition of his father.  Obama’s father was a Kenyan nationalist and a Muslim.  This man held no allegiance to the United States, as a matter of fact; this man espoused an anti-colonialist viewpoint that was outright hostile to Western countries.  Some have made the case that Barack Obama is his father’s son.  Here is an excerpt from an article written by Dinesh D’Souza published at Forbes.com:

The climax of Obama’s narrative is when he goes to Kenya and weeps at his father’s grave. It is riveting: “When my tears were finally spent,” he writes, “I felt a calmness wash over me. I felt the circle finally close. I realized that who I was, what I cared about, was no longer just a matter of intellect or obligation, no longer a construct of words. I saw that my life in America–the black life, the white life, the sense of abandonment I’d felt as a boy, the frustration and hope I’d witnessed in Chicago–all of it was connected with this small piece of earth an ocean away, connected by more than the accident of a name or the color of my skin. The pain that I felt was my father’s pain.”

In an eerie conclusion, Obama writes that “I sat at my father’s grave and spoke to him through Africa’s red soil.” In a sense, through the earth itself, he communes with his father and receives his father’s spirit. Obama takes on his father’s struggle, not by recovering his body but by embracing his cause. He decides that where Obama Sr. failed, he will succeed. Obama Sr.’s hatred of the colonial system becomes Obama Jr.’s hatred; his botched attempt to set the world right defines his son’s objective. Through a kind of sacramental rite at the family tomb, the father’s struggle becomes the son’s birthright.

That explains a lot.  Barack Obama has a vision of transforming the United States.  He has done it by alienating our traditional allies and embracing our implacable foes.  This man has acted more like an African dictator than a president of the United States.  He has bypassed Congress by using the federal bureaucracy and with the use of executive actions.  Dreams from my father, indeed.  

Let’s contrast that with Senator Ted Cruz’s father.  In 1957, Rafael Cruz fled from Cuba to the United States where he was granted asylum.  He later moved to Canada in the late 1960’s where he owned a business along with his American wife.  They moved back to Texas in 1974.  Mr. Cruz became a naturalized American citizen in 2005.  Anyone who has listened to Rafael Cruz knows this man has embraced the American creed and has a profound love for the United States and its Constitution, as does his son, Ted Cruz.  Again, the son has followed the conditions of his father.  Here is an excerpt from Vattel’s, The Law of Nations:   

THE LAW OF NATIONS

212. Citizens and Nations

The citizens are the members of the civil society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of citizens, THOSE CHILDREN NATURALLY FOLLOW THE CONDITIONS OF THEIR FATHERS, and served to all of their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, IN CONSEQUENCE OF WHAT IT OWES TO ITS OWN PRESERVATION; and it is presumed as matter, that each citizen, on entering into society; reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. THE COUNTRY OF THE FATHER IS THEREFORE THAT OF THE CHILDREN; and these become true citizens merely by tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming of the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe society in which they were born. I SAY IN THAT ORDER TO BE OF THE COUNTRY, IT IS NECESSARY THAT A PERSON BE BORN OF A FATHER WHO IS A CITIZEN, IF HE IS BORN THERE OF A FOREIGNER, IT WILL BE ONLY THE PLACE OF HIS BIRTH, AND NOT HIS COUNTRY.

Source:

http://costonscomplaint.blogspot.com/2010/03/barack-obama-is-not-natural-born.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama,_Sr.

http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2010/0927/politics-socialism-capitalism-private-enterprises-obama-business-problem.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rafael_Bienvenido_Cru

Facebook Co-Founder Would Rather be Caned Than Pay Capital Gains Taxes

What is the value of an American citizenship these days? To thousands of ex-patriots, their membership in this country is more of a liability than a privilege. And who can blame them. We have politicians who demonize the producers, while catering to the teat squawkers. We have millions of illegal aliens who leech off of the taxpayers, while demanding we learn their language and cater to their needs. Why would anyone value citizenship in a country that doesn’t value their citizens?

Facebook co-founder, Eduardo Saverin renounced his American citizenship before his company announced its planned initial public offering. He did this in order to evade paying capital gains taxes. And guess where he plans on moving to: Singapore. That’s right. He would rather move to a country that canes people for petty crimes than stay in the United States. American citizenship isn’t what it used to be. But you’d think it would be better than a country who canes people. Here is a dissident describing a caning experience:

Singapore's laws today permit the state to beat you the prescribed number of strokes with a rattan cane, soaked previous night in brine or water to make it supple. Sentences for various offences, usually violent crimes (which includes even pickpocketing) but even minor ones like painting graffiti, carries this unimaginably brutal punishment, whose beating (caning) is in addition to the prison term the prisoner has to suffer.

The beater or the caner is a prison officer specially trained to beat people, the object being to inflict the maximum amount of pain on the prisoner. While strapped to a gurney, naked with his buttock exposed, the officer who carries out the torture, takes a couple of steps and swings his cane hard, very hard, with full force at the prisoners buttocks.

By reason of his training, the caning is so forceful and the velocity of the swing so great, that it is reported that on one beating alone, the cane digs deep into the flesh, and even pieces of bloodied flesh hang out. There is so much blood on the floor from these beatings that after one or 2 stokes, the beating is interrupted for the bloodied floor to be mopped and the blood removed, after which the beatings resume.

I think you get the picture. I don't wish to say more.

Say what you will about Singapore. At least they value citizenship. Here is what happened to an American who overstayed his visa:

Kamari Charlton was arrested on Sept 1 when he attempted to leave the city-state 169 days

after his 90-day social visit pass expired, his lawyer M. Ravi said.

Mr Charlton, who was born in the Bahamas and owns a construction company there, was in Singapore while his wife received medical care for pregnancy complications, Mr Ravi said. It was not clear why Mr Charlton and his wife chose Singapore for medical treatment.

Staying in Singapore for more than 90 days after the end of a visa is punishable with a maximum jail term of six months and at least three cane strokes.

The Attorney General’s office declined to comment on the case. A judge is to meet with lawyers from both sides in a pretrial conference on Friday.

If found guilty, Mr Charlton would be the first American citizen caned in Singapore since 1994, when teenager Michael Fay was punished for vandalism.

Let the caning begin! You can’t say Singapore doesn’t value their citizenship. I wonder what would happen if we implemented their policies. I bet there would be a line stretching from Mexico all the way to Wyoming.

Instead, we have politicians like Sen. Chuck Schumer who are more interested in fleecing the likes of an Eduardo Saverin rather than keeping them as citizens. Here is a genius solution to the ex-patriot problem:

At a news conference this morning, Sens. Schumer and Bob Casey, D-Pa., will unveil the “Ex-PATRIOT” – “Expatriation Prevention by Abolishing Tax-Related Incentives for Offshore Tenancy” – Act to respond directly to Saverin’s move, which they dub a “scheme” that would “help him duck up to $67 million in taxes.”

The senators will call Saverin’s move an “outrage” and will outline their plan to re-impose taxes on expatriates like Saverin even after they flee the United States and take up residence in a foreign country. Their proposal would also impose a mandatory 30 percent tax on the capital gains of anybody who renounces their U.S. citizenship.

The plan would bar individuals like Saverin from ever reentering the United States again.

Nice solution Sen. Chuck E. Schumer: Super Genius. Soon, he will advocate building the equivalent of a Berlin Wall around the country, so as to keep the producers from escaping.

Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/16/us-usa-citizen-renounce-idUSBRE83F0UF20120416

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/05/senators-to-unveil-the-ex-patriot-act-to-respond-to-facebooks-saverins-tax-scheme/

http://singaporedissident.blogspot.com/2010/04/singapore-brutalized-singaporeans.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/singapore/8079235/Former-American-football-player-Kamari-Charlton-faces-caning-in-Singapore.html

One Third of Americans Couldn't Pass a Citizenship Test

Here is a testament to America’s state of decline. Approximately, a third of our citizens couldn’t pass a civics test. The Daily Mail reported the following:

A survey has found that around one third of U.S. citizens would fail the country's citizenship test for immigrants.

The study, conducted by the Center for the Study of the American Dream at Xavier University, in Cincinnati, Ohio, found that one in three respondents would fail the civics portion of the test given to those applying for U.S. citizenship.

More than 1,000 Americans over the age of 18 were asked 10 random questions from the civics test, which asks about US history and government topics.

Of those questioned, 35 per cent were unable to answer the pass mark of five correctly.

A Wednesday, May 2 Rasmussen Poll found that 31% of likely voters thought the country was heading in the right direction. I wonder if these are same idiots who couldn’t pass a basic civics test.

At least there is one highlight from the Daily Mail: 97% of immigrants passed the test. Hopefully, these people value their citizenship more than the natives.

Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2138877/One-Americans-fail-citizenship-test.html#ixzz1trn7XnvN

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/right_direction_or_wrong_track

PC Crowd to Banish "I-Word" American Citizen is Next

When Progressives don’t like a word, they change the meaning of it. The latest victim of the English language is “illegal.” Apparently, there are a whole group of people who take umbrage at being defined as an “illegal,” particularly the kind who come from other countries. Here is the definition of illegal:

il·le·gal

adj.

1. Prohibited by law.
2. Prohibited by official rules: an illegal pass in football.
3. Unacceptable to or not performable by a computer: an illegal operation.

n.

1. forbidden by law; unlawful; illicit
2. unauthorized or prohibited by a code of official or accepted rules

n.

a person who has entered or attempted to enter a country illegally

So, if you are in the United States without permission, by definition you are here illegally. But the preferred word is “undocumented.”
F.A. Hayek wrote about the perversion of the language in his work, “The Road to Serfdom.”

FOREWARD TO THE 1956 AMERICAN PAPERBACK EDITION:

The fact that this book was originally written with only the British public in mind does not appear to have seriously affected its intelligibility for the American reader. But there is one point of phraseology which I ought to explain here to forestall any misunderstanding. I use throughout the term “liberal” in the original, nineteenth-century sense in which it is still current in Britain. In current American usage it often means very nearly the opposite of this. It has been part of the camouflage of leftish movements in this country, helped by the muddleheadedness of many who really believe in liberty, that “liberal” has come to mean the advocacy of almost every kind of government control. I am still puzzled why those in the United States who truly believe in liberty should not only have allowed the left to appropriate this almost indispensible term but should even have assisted by beginning to use it themselves as a term of opprobrium. This seems to be particularly regrettable because of the consequent tendency of many true liberals to describe themselves as conservatives.

He also wrote:

If one has not one’s self experienced this process, it is difficult to appreciate the magnitude of this change of the meaning of words, the confusion which it causes, and the barriers to any rational discussion which it creates. It has to be seen to be understood how, if one of two brothers embraces the new faith, after a short while he appears to speak a different language which makes any real communication between them impossible. And the confusion becomes worse because this change of meaning of the words describing political ideals is not a single event but a continuous process, a technique employed consciously or unconsciously to direct the people. Gradually, as this process continues, the whole language becomes despoiled, and words become empty shells deprived of any definite meaning, as capable of denoting one thing as its opposite and used solely for the emotional associations which still adhere to them.

After they banish “illegal” from the lexicon, let’s guess which words will be considered offensive by the PC crowd. Will it be American? How about citizen? Wait, how about putting the two together: American citizen. Now, that’s offensive.


Source: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/you-havent-even-thought-this-out-bill-oreilly-confronts-drop-the-i-word-spokesman-monica-novoa/

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/illegal

Secretary Timothy Geithner's Citizenship Privilege Tax

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner stated in an interview that the rich need to pay more taxes for the privilege of being an American; yet, over half of American citizens don’t pay federal income taxes, whatsoever. Politifacts confirms this assertion:

Conservatives have a point that richer Americans pay the lion’s share of federal taxes. In 2007, according to the Urban-Brookings Center, the richest 20 percent paid 68.9 percent of federal taxes, and the top 1 percent paid 28.1 percent. (One would expect the rich to pay more, since they earn more, but these percentages are even higher than their share of the nation's total income. According to one frequently cited academic study, the top 20 percent earned 61.4 percent of income in 2006 and the top 1 percent earned 21.3 percent of income that same year.)

In addition, the richest 10 percent, 5 percent and 1 percent of taxpayers each paid significantly higher effective tax rates than Americans lower on the income spectrum.

So, what price does a teat squawker pay for the price of being an American citizen? Why just as much as an illegal alien of course.

Thirteen years after Congress overhauled the American welfare system, 57 percent of immigrants with children &#151 those in the country legally or not &#151 use at least one government, welfare program according to a report released Tuesday by the Center for Immigration Studies.

In comparison, 39 percent of native-born Americans with children are signed up for welfare, the report found.

In Texas, 54 percent of legal immigrants and 70 percent of illegal immigrants receive welfare assistance, with illegal immigrants generally receiving benefits on behalf of their U.S.-born children, according to the study, written by a think tank that favors reducing immigration into the U.S.

Overall, Texas tied with California and New York for the second highest immigrant welfare rates behind Arizona.

We should note that the study takes an expansive view of what constitutes a government welfare program, so programs such as reduced-price school lunches for low-income students are classified as welfare, according to CIS’ methodology.

Texas showed 61 percent of households headed by an immigrant utilizing at least one program compared to the 42 percent of Texas natives on welfare.

It looks like the privileges of being an illegal alien outweigh that of a productive American citizen; a disparity that even Turbo Tax couldn’t remedy.

Source:

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/jul/08/john-cornyn/john-cornyn-says-51-percent-american-households-pa/

http://blog.chron.com/txpotomac/2011/04/study-70-of-texas-illegal-immigrant-families-receive-welfare/

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/8702329-majority-of-us-immigrant-households-with-children-on-welfare