Showing posts with label affordable care act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label affordable care act. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 4, 2017

Democrats' Bumper Sticker Slogan: Make America Sick Again




Here we go again.  Democrats create a monumental disaster and when the adults step in to clean up their mess these cry babies throw a temper tantrum by blaming others for their failures.  It’s formulaic right down to the bumper sticker slogans.


The American people systematically began to throw progressives out of office starting in 2010 and culminating in a Trump presidency.  The Republicans were given an overwhelming mandate to get rid of the Affordable Care Act.  Now we know Democrats and their lapdogs in the media will pull every dirty trick out of their playbook.  Here is just a sampling of what we can expect.


 Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said the GOP plan is to "make America sick again," riffing off of Trump's campaign pledge to make America great again. He and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said the GOP is waging a full scale assault on the U.S. healthcare system, including on Medicare and Medicaid.


"Republicans are plotting, and soon will be executing, a full scale assault on the three pillars that support the American healthcare system," Schumer said, pointing to the the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Medicare and Medicaid. "The Republican plan to cut healthcare wouldn't make America great again, it would make American sick again, and lead to chaos instead of affordable care."


Republicans want to make America sick again? That ranks right up there with Republicans want to starve your children and kill grandma and grandpa by taking away their Social Security.  I believe the American people have wised up to these demagogic tactics especially since the Affordable Care Act has proven be anything but.

Source:

Thursday, February 11, 2016

IRS Commissioner Koskinen Tells Congress to go to Hell





IRS Commissioner John Koskinen reaffirmed everything Americans suspected about federal government agencies and their attitude towards Congress.  They don’t give a damn where monies are allocated by our elected representatives.  They will do as they please despite constitutional prerogatives of the power of the purse.

Congress allocated funds to the IRS specifically for cybersecurity and customer service.  Mr. Koskinen decided they can go to hell.  He’ll determine were taxpayer monies go.  Here is an excerpt from the Washington Examiner:

"Congress, as I noted in my testimony, has underfunded … the Affordable Care Act," IRS Commissioner John Koskinen told a panel of the House Appropriations Committee. "That does not remove the statutory mandate we have that we have to implement the act."

Koskinen delivered his remarks in response to a question from Chairman Rep. Hal Rogers, R-Ky., who pointed out that Congress had "increased funding specifically for taxpayer services" in 2014 and 2016.

Koskinen said it didn't matter where Congress intended the money to go, explaining the agency had pulled funding for customer service and cybersecurity in order to ensure compliance with the ACA.

The Obama administration has shown nothing but contempt for Congress and the Constitution.  This POS should be impeached along with the pretender in the Oval Office.

Source:

Tuesday, November 18, 2014

Just Who is Gruber the Grafter Calling Stupid?




Can the mainstream media get anything right?  They’ve been wrong on so many levels it has become a threat to our republic.  Case in point is Chris Cillizza at the Washington Post.  He recently wrote an article trying to figure out why conservatives have gone cat nip crazy over Gruber the Grafter, the Obamacare architect and mind poisoner at MIT.   This beltway courtesan thinks we are personally insulted by Gruber’s ‘stupid’ remarks.  Here is an excerpt:


The key to understanding why Gruber has become a cause celebre -- but not in a good way -- for conservatives is that his comments about the ACA confirm two things that the right has long believed about Democrats and the law: (a) The ACA was made purposely vague to keep the public in the dark about its depth and breadth, and (b) liberals think conservatives are stupid.

And this:


The second point is slightly more subtle but, I think, even more responsible for why Gruber and his comments have conservatives seeing red. Nothing makes conservatives more angry than the belief, which they think is widespread among liberals, that they are stupid. That if only conservatives read as much as the left or had the intellectual capacity of the left, they would see things the way the left sees them


First of all, the ACA was shoved down our throats.  That is indisputable.  However, to assume that conservatives are mad as hell about Gruber calling us stupid has missed the mark.  I’ve got news for you Mr. Cillizza.  Gruber wasn’t calling conservatives stupid.  We’ve been warning the American people about the ACA from the very beginning.  We knew democrats were/are a bunch of liars, thieves, and hypocrites for ages.  No.  Gruber was calling you and anyone who votes for democrats stupid.  And he is right.

Gruber let the cat out of the bag by telling his fellow elites that you and your fellow libtards couldn’t handle the truth.  We conservatives suspected what was happening and we didn’t fall for it.  You and your ilk are the ones Gruber called ‘stupid.’


There isn’t one conservative I know who concedes intellectual superiority to the left.  Actually, it’s just the opposite.  And we don’t have to hide behind closed doors to smirk about your stupidity.  We’ll do it to your face.  To say conservatives are insecure about their intellect says more about the wishful thinking by liberals whose beliefs and policies have been proven wrong time after time.  Obamacare and Jon Gruber is just a cherry on top.


Source:

Wednesday, July 30, 2014

Democrats Whining About Obamacare Whiners.




If you’re complaining about the cost of your health insurance, don’t expect any sympathy from Democrats.  You’re nothing more than a whiner to them.  National Review reported the following:

Representative Anna Eshoo (D., Calif.) wants Republicans to stop “whining” about the insurance policies cancelled due to Obamacare regulations.

“Your plan is whining. Your plan is suing the president and using taxpayer dollars,” Eshoo said to Republicans during a House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing as lawmakers debated a proposal by Representative Bill Cassidy (R., La.) to allow people to keep purchasing group plans currently available.

“I hope no more Saturday Night Live whining is brought up in legislation because it’s not attractive, it’s not truthful, and it really does not fit with the dignity of the American people,” Eshoo also said, referring to an old SNL sketch.

Eshoo argued that the Obamacare regulations that caused the plans to be cancelled improve on the old policies.

“I think that the benefits that come in the package as a result of reforming the health insurance industry, people care about that,” she said.

We care alright.  We care the federal government is forcing us to pay for coverage that don’t pertain to our needs. 

Why should retirees and single males be required to purchase birth control, prenatal, maternity and newborn care?   Do we really need to be forced to pay for preventive and wellness services?  And as for mental health services, every moron who voted for and supported this crap should be forced into therapy, or, at least attend a basic class in economics and the U.S. Constitution.


Source:


Saturday, July 26, 2014

Will Liberals Use 14th Amendment to Advance Obamacare?




How is it possible that two federal appellate courts can look at an unambiguous statute in a law and come to different conclusions?  The answer is progressive judges will interpret anything they want, even when the language is concise and declaratory.  That’s what happened in two recent rulings on Obamacare.

The so-called Affordable Healthcare Act is highly dependent on federal subsidies.  Very few can afford health insurance without it.  The language is self-evident.  Only state-run exchanges are eligible for federal subsidies.  There were no ands, ifs or buts in the statute.  But according to liberal judges, we must have some kind of Vulcan mind meld to know the intent of Congress.

We all knew the intent of that Congress. It was to deceive and cajole the American people while shoving this excrement sandwich down our collective throats.  After all, it was House Speaker Nancy Pelosi who declared, “We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy.”  Yeah, we know what their intent was.

Once again, Obamacare is destined for the Supreme Court.  After the Roberts fiasco, I’m not so sure we can count on a slam dunk.   It’s obvious the Obama administration is violating the law.

Let’s assume the Supreme Court does its duty and rules that only state-run exchanges are eligible for federal subsidies, we know that will not be the end of it.  Liberals never give up.  I am willing to bet another lawsuit will wind its way to a pliable federal court and this time progressives will use their favorite weapon, the old dependable 14th Amendment.

The argument will be made that citizens are being denied equal protection under the law.  They are paying taxes without reciprocity while the rest of the country is enjoying the fruits of their labor; that without federal subsidies, they are being denied access to healthcare.  We will witness the Sandra Fluke defense.

Doubt me?  Just wait and see.



Source:



Saturday, June 21, 2014

Obamacare Shockwaves to Hit North Carolina




I must admit, I’m surprised.  The Charlotte Observer published and op-ed criticizing the Affordable Care Act, which is turning out to be not so affordable.  A tsunami of rate increases is about to send shockwaves throughout North Carolina.

From Stephen Parente, a Professor of Health Finance, the Associate Dean of the Carlson School of Management, and the Director of the Medical Industry Leadership Institute at the University of Minnesota.

North Carolina, buckle up. Over the next few months, you’ll learn how much your health insurance premiums will go up for next year. The early evidence isn’t good – the percentage increase could be in the double digits.

But that’s nothing compared to what you’ll face in 2017. In May, I released a comprehensive study showing how the Affordable Care Act will likely play out in North Carolina over the next few years. The diagnosis isn’t good.

First, the short version. In two years, the ACA’s structural problems will lead to substantial premium increases. Once that happens, North Carolinians will likely leave the insurance market in droves. They’ll have little choice – they won’t be able to afford health insurance because federal subsidies won’t keep up with the rapid price increases. Within a decade, this could swell the ranks of the state’s uninsured by 57 percent.
This isn’t baseless speculation. I reached this conclusion using a peer-reviewed economic model published in several health journals. It was funded by private and government sources, including the Department of Health and Human Services, and has been cited by multiple Supreme Court justices in ACA-related rulings.

But why won’t this happen until 2017? Because that’s the year when the Affordable Care Act goes into full effect and certain temporary provisions begin to sunset. The changes will affect all plans sold for 2017 and beyond.

This end result is not surprising to many of us, who’ve been critical of this federal monstrosity. Hopefully, the voters will turn their wrath on Senator Kay Hagan, who shoved this bill of goods down our throats.




Thursday, March 20, 2014

North Carolina's Obamacare Dystopia



The Obamacare chickens are coming home to roost.  North Carolina lawmakers held a forum outlining the consequences of this disastrous program that was destined to fail.  Carolina Journal reported the following:

RALEIGH — State lawmakers were presented Tuesday with a litany of potential horror stories related to the federal Affordable Care Act. At its worst, Obamacare would sock North Carolina with thousands of job losses, double-digit insurance premium increases, deep Medicare cuts to help pay for the health reform, and insolvent hospitals and medical facilities

Chris Conover, a professor at Duke University’s Center for Health Policy and Inequalities Research, offered this grim assessment to the General Assembly’s Joint Study Committee on the Affordable Care Act and Implementation Issues.

And Conover was not alone. Mona Moon, executive administrator of the State Health Plan for Teachers and State Employees, said the retirement system would incur $116 million in Obamacare compliance costs by 2017. The ever-evolving law could tag taxpayers with additional costs on state agencies, school systems, community colleges, and universities, Moon said.

Mark Fleming, vice president of government affairs for Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina, said the insurance giant already sees “troubling trends,” including a mix of patients that has been sicker than expected and a program infrastructure that remains a work in progress long after its launch.

Fleming warned of the potential for higher insurance premiums for all North Carolinians as a result.


Yet, even with the facts looking them straight in the eye, Democrats still are in denial:


The cascade of negative testimony caused some Democratic committee members to roll their eyes. Some walked out early on Conover’s harsh evaluation, and Sen. Floyd McKissick, D-Durham, issued an almost plaintive request.

“Is it intended that we will have someone speak and provide us information who actually believes the Affordable Care Act is a good idea?” he said. “Or are we only going to hear from those who are in opposition to the Affordable Care Act?”

State Rep. Verla Insko, D-Orange, expressed surprise at Conover’s contention that the state’s economy would shrink by 90,000 full-time equivalent jobs, and 300,000 full-time equivalent positions would shift to part-time, as employers try to avoid the employer mandate to pay for insurance for full-time workers and other Obamacare-related costs.

“I don’t know that there’s any reason why the Affordable Care Act would cause a reduction in the number of employees unless we had robots doing some of the work,” Insko said. 

She also insisted that higher taxes could be an economic stimulus because of multiplier effects of government spending, and that some of the nation’s most robust economies are in high-tax states


Amazing!  Absolutely amazing, that after all that has happened and all that is yet to come, these people are completely blinded by their ideology.  And as usual this so-called representative believes government spending is the answer to our economic woes.  Without a doubt, Rep. Verla Insko believes the New Deal pulled us out of the Great Depression.

If you think the above employment assessment is bleak, wait until you read the following prospects for our utopian health care system:


“Relatively minor improvements” in benefits under Obamacare “are more than offset by the sizable cuts in Medicare … to bankroll 40 percent of the ACA’s costs,” Conover said. Continued Medicare cuts in doctor payments “will be devastating” to seniors’ access to health care, according to Medicare’s actuaries, he said.

“Very deep cuts” in Medicaid Disproportionate Share payments to hospitals are planned atop a 75 percent cut in Medicare DSH payments, Conover said. Those payments cover the cost for the uncompensated care of uninsured people. 

Medicaid is prohibited by statute from paying more than Medicare for hospital services, so Medicare cuts will drive payment rates for both Medicaid and Medicare to well below the levels that are paid by private insurers, Conover said. 

The Medicare actuary predicts that 15 percent of health facilities will be operating in the red by 2020 as a result. 

“As these facilities are shuttered or start shedding money-losing services such as emergency rooms, this obviously is going to have adverse effects on access to care for the community at large, not just for seniors,” Conover said.

A quarter of North Carolina doctors do not accept Medicaid patients now due to low reimbursement rates. 

“The ACA has put Medicare on a path to soon be paying less than Medicaid does for doctor services,” Conover said. “We can only imagine what’s going to happen to access to care to seniors when Medicare’s payment rates are less than half of the Medicaid levels.”

We are in the throes of the Democratic Party’s dystopia. If we continue on this path, can anyone say:  Look out Venezuela, here we come!





Thursday, February 27, 2014

Only 6% are Satisfied with Obamacare



According to a CBS/New York Times poll, only 6% of the American people are satisfied with Obamacare.  Yet, democrats refuse to repeal this monstrosity.  They believe they can fix it.  How can anyone trust the same yahoos that didn’t read the bill to begin with, to fix a bad law?  That’s doubling down on stupid.  And yet, the voters elected Barack Obama, again.  Go figure.












Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Sen. Harry Reid's Obamacare Lullabies




The party of the people, that’s what the democrats tells us.  They are the self-proclaimed champions of the common man, the trodden, and dispossessed.  Why, we are nothing without their comforting, warm embrace.  And if you disagree, if you complain about the harm their policies have wrought upon you and your family, well you’re just a liar.  After all, according to Senator Harry Reid, democratic policies are not horror stories, but bedtime lullabies. 







The only way some Americans have lower premiums is if they have been shoved onto Medicaid or are receiving a taxpayer subsidy.  And this kind of debt is unsustainable.








Thursday, February 13, 2014

Obamacare Rocks a Pennsylvania Small Business




Just like one of the employees said, "There's nothing affordable about this.  Wake up America."

Monday, October 28, 2013

Libtards Bemoan the Cost of Obamacare



Many of us who’ve been against Obamacare from the very beginning and have written about the consequences of this monstrosity are amused at the outright stupidity or willful ignorance by those on the left.  Here are some examples of incredulous libtards:

Sue Klinkhamer has a problem.
It’s called Obamacare.
And the irony of her situation is not lost on her. In a recent email addressed to her former boss, Illinois Congressman Bill Foster, and other Democratic colleagues, she wrote:
“I spent two years defending Obamacare. I had constituents scream at me, spit at me and call me names that I can’t put in print. The congressman was not re-elected in 2010 mainly because of the anti-Obamacare anger. When the congressman was not re-elected, I also (along with the rest of our staff) lost my job. I was upset that because of the health care issue, I didn’t have a job anymore but still defended Obamacare because it would make health care available to everyone at, what I assumed, would be an affordable price. I have now learned that I was wrong. Very wrong.”
 You couldn’t have been more wrong.  One woman wrote a letter to the president of Blue Cross and Blue Shield in California bemoaning the fact that she was all for Obamacare until finding out she had to pay for it.
 Anyone who had a modicum of curiosity could have refuted the nonsense the Democrats were spewing.  I started this blog out of frustration as means to refute Senator Kay Hagan’s assertions on Obamacare.  Here is one of her absurdities:
"Today, the Senate passed a health care reform bill that reduces costs, expands coverage, and provides stability for North Carolina families. It prevents insurance companies from taking away your coverage when you get sick or discriminating against people with pre-existing coverage conditions. The bill reduces the waste, fraud and abuse that currently exists in the delivery of care, and it will save ourcountry money by decreasing the mounting federal deficit. As we move forward, I will continue working to ensure that North Carolina's families, seniors, and small businesses have a seat at the table.


.
Here is what I wrote on January 10, 2010.  One of my very first blog posts:
 Spoken like a true statist. What Senator Hagan and her fellow socialist will not acknowledge or concede is that federal and state government regulations are responsible for the rising cost of health care insurance. A study by the Cato Institute goes into great detail on government’s role:

"The high cost of health services regulation is responsible for more than seven million Americans lacking health insurance, or one in six of the average daily uninsured. Moreover, 4,000 more Americans die every year from costs associated with health services regulation (22,000) than from lack of health insurance (18,000). The annual net cost of health services regulation dwarfs other costs imposed by government intervention in the health care sector. This cost exceeds annual consumer expenditures on gasoline and oil in the United States and is twice the size of the annual output of the motion picture and sound recording industries.

 It doesn’t take a genius to find this kind of information.  It’s right there for all to see.  Even a senator from North Carolina should’ve been able to figure out that Obamacare is anything but affordable.  Now the whole country is under assault because a bunch of statist refused to do their homework.  Thanks a lot libtards.

Source:

Monday, October 14, 2013

North Carolina Newspapers Collude on Medicaid Victims




Anyone who reads a newspaper in North Carolina is well aware that the majority of them are mouthpieces for the Democratic Party.  We are now witnessing a collusion between regional outlets, cutting and pasting articles in an attempt to influence policy decisions in Raleigh.

This past Sunday, the Charlotte Observer featured an article by one of their staff and her co-writer from the News and Observer.  And I’m sure the latter published their version on Sunday as well.  You can read both articles by clicking the links below.  What these two papers did was create a template featuring a victim from their area and proceeded to blame the Republicans for their woes.  It is basically the same article with a different face, in a different region.

I’ve learned a long time ago not to trust the mainstream media, and as with all victim pieces, these reporters usually don’t tell the whole truth.  There are certain qualifications that have to be met for Medicaid.  Below is the link.

The liberals that run these papers are ticked off that North Carolina didn’t accept the “free money” from the federal government that would have expanded the Medicaid rolls an additional 500,000 people.  Yet, they couldn’t care less about the families who are being forced out of their current health insurance policies because of Obamacare.  Here are a few victims who wrote to Rep.  Richard Hudson of North Carolina’s 8th Congressional District:

  • “I just want to put a name with how the Affordable Care Act will affect my family of four. I am 45 years old and self-employed. Under the ACA, a similar policy to what I have now will increase my premiums from $669 per month to $968 per month. The new plan also reduces what my policy pays once I reach my $5,450 deductible from 100% to 50%. I do not qualify for any subsidies or tax credits. This will greatly affect my family and I am uncertain as to how this is considered a fair policy. I am giving this information because I truly do not believe anyone in Washington understands the actual costs to average citizens and the negative impact this legislation will have on our economy as a whole.”
     
  • "I received my “Obamacare” letter in the mail yesterday from Blue Cross Blue Shield. My monthly premium went from a little over $700 to nearly $1,600. Quite frankly, I most likely will join the ranks of uninsured Americans."
     
  • “I am a self-employed mother of 3 including one foster daughter we hope to adopt. My husband is also self-employed. Therefore, we have paid for our own health insurance policies for the past 7 years. I received a letter from BCBSNC this week stating that, due to the ACA, our premium would increase almost $200.00 per month while our benefits would decrease. Our deductible will go from $5,000 to $10,000. I am beyond concerned about what this change will do to my family and our ability to continue to pay for our healthcare. I understand this act was passed to provide insurance to those who could not previously afford it and in 2014 my family will join that plight... I find it outrageous that as a tax-paying American citizen, I do not have the right to choose whether or not I have health insurance.”


Hey all you Observers that infest the Old North State, there are plenty of other victims of Obamacare that you can report on.  But unfortunately they don't  fit your template.