IPCC Bastardizes Climate Science Reports

I read an editorial this morning by McClatchy CEO and president, Craig Forman about their well-earned designation as fake news distributors. He refuses to acknowledge, or understand, that his industry has been infiltrated by an army of left-wing advocates who have no regard for the tenets of journalism. Sure, he points to a handful of stories where they actually reported the truth, but that doesn’t make up for the bastardization of the news industry.

And that seems to be the general theme when it comes to liberals. They bastardize everything: news, marriage, sex, education, language, religion, politics, weather, economics; you name it they’ve bastardized it. They contaminate everything they touch.

So this brings us to another IPCC scam. Once again, we are told that the state of the planet is in dire straits due to man-made global warming. How many times have we heard this nonsense? How many times have they been wrong?

The Washington Times published an op-ed exposing another fraud this pseudo-governmental agency has foisted upon the world. Here is an excerpt:

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change climate forecasts were wrong from their earliest reports in 1990. They were so inaccurate that they stopped calling them forecasts and made three “projections”: low, medium, and high. Since then, even their “low” scenario projections were wrong.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change created an illusion of certainty about their science, and therefore their forecasts. They let people think that they study all causes of climate change when they only look at human-caused change. That is impossible unless you know and understand total climate change and the mechanisms, and we don’t. It allowed them to ignore all non-human causes of change, including the Sun.

One of the reasons the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change gets away with this is that almost no one reads the underlying science reports. Indeed, the “Final Government Draft” of the underlying science report, which appears on the IPCC Web site, even cautions the reader, “Do Not Cite, Quote or Distribute.”

So that's how they get away with it.

Hey, Craig Forman! If you want to repair your industries reputation, you can begin by exposing this corrupt organization called the IPCC.

Source:

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/opinion/article220302195.html


https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/15/why-un-climate-report-cannot-be-trusted/?fbclid=IwAR2XUuG139SoM5sd24byb6FxPQ8nN8zOVdhiRkwVeTU5ecZU12ZSRkpIKlY

I was Dragged into the Mud by a Liberal Pig

I read an article today by Frank Miele entitled, The Left’s Love Affair with Doublethink. I can say that summed up an experience I had last week. Here is an excerpt from that article:


If you have a hard time following the logic of some liberal arguments, don’t worry. It’s not you.


Taking a page out of George Orwell’s “Nineteen Eighty-Four,” our modern prog friends have mastered the art of doublethink — “the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.”


As Orwell described the “labyrinthine” world of doublethink, it was “To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy.”


Anyone who is paying attention to judicial elections in North Carolina is aware of a liberal attorney who’s trying to skirt the threshold of decency by passing himself off as something he’s not. Chris Anglin is a Democrat portraying himself as a constitutional conservative. His motive is to split the GOP ticket and usher in a liberal jurist. His campaign manager is a notorious partisan who constantly tweets invectives at our Republican dominated General Assembly. And we’re supposed to believe Mr. Anglin is a decent and honorable man whose sole purpose for running for office is to uphold the rule of law and the integrity of an “independent” judiciary. LOL!


Mr. Anglin wrote an op-ed that was published in the Charlotte Observer. I thought this man’s behavior was so reprehensible that I was willing to wade into the comment section of the Charlotte Disturber. I’m here to say it didn’t take long for a liberal pig to drag me down into the mud.


I’m not a newbie by any means. I’ve debated liberals for decades and am well aware of their lies and deceit. But this particular scumbag really takes the cake. I first commented that Chris Anglin outed himself as a flaming liberal. I received a response from a Mr. WH that stated, I didn’t read the article. Now mind you, Chris Anglin’s op-ed is an assertion that he’s a “conservative.” As a conservative, I can tell you he’s anything but. And here I have a liberal telling me, I didn’t understand what Mr. Anglin wrote.


I informed WH that I not only read Mr. Anglin’s op-ed, I critiqued it. And if WH would like to read my post, he could access my facebook page. His response was pure gibberish.


It was quite obvious this man didn’t want to debate Mr. Anglin’s conservative bona fides. No, he wanted to obfuscate the issue at hand. It only went downhill from there. This troll then declared I was an illiterate for not taking the time to decipher his nonsense. I informed this fool, that the failure was all his. A writer has the responsibility to communicate in clear and concise sentences. A thesaurus doesn’t deign a keen intellect which is exactly what WH was trying to convey.


In another thread, Mr. WH accused Republican operatives of trying to recruit Democrats for judicial office. I responded by saying at least they were Democrats and not posers. WH then denied he had written such a thing and accused me, once again, of being an illiterate. This was completely surreal.


Conservatives need to face the facts, liberals are completely unhinged. We need to constantly remind ourselves that these people are capable of the worst kinds of deceit and they will use doublethink to obfuscate and manipulate truth to advance their ideology.


Source:

http://www.dailyinterlake.com/frank_miele_editors_2_cents/20180804/the_lefts_love_affair_with_doublethink

https://costonscomplaint.blogspot.com/2018/07/chris-anglin-wannabe-emperor-in-black.html

The Deep State Defined

So, what is the Deep State and who is running it? Whoopi Goldberg doubts that such a thing exist. Liberals laugh at such a notion, and why wouldn’t they? To them, the Beltway is a paragon of governance. They love the idea of a federal bureaucrat shoving his liberal ideology down our throats. What’s wrong with that? 

CANDIDATE		PARTY	VOTES	PCT.	E.V.
	Hillary Clinton	Democrat	282,830	90.9%	3
	Donald J. Trump	Republican	12,723	4.1	—
	Others	Independent	6,551	2.1	—
	Gary Johnson	Libertarian	4,906	1.6	—
	Jill Stein	D.C. Statehood Green	4,258	1.4	—

100% reporting (143 of 143 precincts)

First of all, let’s establish where the Deep State resides. The obvious answer is Washington D.C. Hillary Clinton won its 3 Electoral College votes with 90.9% of the popular vote; Donald Trump a mere 4.1%. That’s pretty lopsided for our nation’s capitol don’t you think? Isn’t this town supposed to be apolitical, or at least bipartisan? HA! Just joking.

Now what is the Deep State? The Deep State consist of all these federal bureaucrats who believe they are the ones running this country; that the president, if a Republican, is just a figurehead, and Congress is just a nuisance that has to be endured. Politicians come and go; bureaucrats are forever.

The prospect of a Trump presidency upset the apple cart. Here is a man who doesn’t understand his place and that doesn’t sit well with the hive. The Bushes understood Washington D.C. and they were quite content on the status quo; not Trump. The Deep Staters wanted Hillary Clinton and they did everything to cover up her felonious activities. Agent Peter Strzok was the point man in the FBI, but how many people know about his wife, Melissa Hodgman at the SEC? Here is an excerpt from Yournewswire.com:

With Hodgman at the SEC and Strzok at the FBI it would be virtually impossible to even know what cases linked to the Clinton Foundation had criminal merit, if each were trying to keep all things Clinton-related quiet.

But Charles Ortel, an expert on the financial dealings and filings of the Clinton Foundation believes having chess pieces in place at the SEC and FBI were only a smaller part of a much larger game for the Clintons.

“The Clinton “business plan” to monetize government is broader than simply gaming one agency – they saw an opportunity to create unregulated globalist government and seeded many organizations with like-minded persons, some of whom were simply naive, but all of whom ultimately are corrupt,” Ortel said.

Ortel, a private investor and writer who exposes large complex international frauds, understands the labyrinth of the Clinton Foundation’s international scams. And while the foundation itself is not a public company which would fall under the SEC’s regulatory umbrella, its finances remain entwined with dozens of public entities that do.

I might add, wasn’t it convenient for the conspirators in the Justice Department to have Jeff Sessions recuse himself from all things related to the past election due to this “Russian interference” canard? The Deep Staters couldn’t believe their luck to have Rod Rosenstein run cover for all of their misdeeds.

Whoopi Goldberg asked who is the leader of the Deep State? In actuality, there is no leader; these people have a hive mentality. They are the Borg.

Source:

https://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/district-of-columbia-president-clinton-trump

https://yournewswire.com/peter-strzoks-wife-sec-blocked-fbi-investigations-clintons/

Liberals Equate President Trump's Rhetoric with Their Bullying

How dare liberals compare President Trump’s rhetoric to these whacked out liberals who’re harassing and threatening Republican politicians and officials. I know it’s a shock we finally have a president who’ll stick up for himself. God knows, conservatives suffered through eight years of George W. Bush. That man was the mainstream media’s pinata. Trump refuses to be their bitch and they can’t handle it.

Since when has self-defense become belligerence? Does anyone remember President Barack Obama’s war cry, “If they bring a knife, we bring a gun” ? I didn’t hear outrage from the media about that.

I have a question, did Republicans confront liberals in the public square and provoke a fight? Did we surround Lois Lerner’s house for harassing the Tea Party? How many Obama officials were kicked out of restaurants and theaters for their acts of hostility to the American people? None!


The editors at the Charlotte Observer have the audacity to equate President Trump’s rhetoric with the lawless behavior of liberals. Here is an excerpt:

It might also seem necessary to liberals to take such drastic action in the face of an administration that tears children from parents, and a president who so often disregards decency. So said congresswoman Maxine Waters to a California crowd over the weekend. “If you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd, and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere,” Waters urged.

But such behavior shouldn't feel satisfying, and it's not necessary. It's liberals trying to beat Donald Trump by becoming Donald Trump.

It wasn't long ago that these same Democrats fretted about Trump's crassness and willingness to demean anyone who dared disagree with him. They and we worried that his bullying would do more harm to political discourse, and that's exactly what's happening, as nastiness has bled from the political fringe into the political mainstream.


Certainly, that's been encouraged by members and supporters of the Trump administration, who regularly ridicule the press and political opponents. All the more reason to punch back, say progressives, who contend that the only way to defeat Trump is to fight bile with bile. But that's not true, as liberals themselves showed last week by getting Trump to back down from his policy of separating immigrant children from parents at the border. How'd they do it? By shining a light on injustice, by flooding social media, by swaying public opinion and eventually Republicans in Washington with the force and volume of their voices.


The editors at the Charlotte Observer are delusional. I got news for these morons, you didn’t win. These illegal aliens weren’t released into the general population, which is what libtards want. Nice try.


You gotta love it. These people are the bullies and they don’t see it. We have suffered through their thuggish behavior for decades and when we finally have a president who refuses to have sand kicked in his face, they consider him a bully.


Yeah, I don’t think so.


Source:

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/opinion/editorials/article213778174.html

Liberals Project their Character Traits onto Conservatives

Wow. The moonbats in the mainstream media have lost their minds. They can’t accept the fact they’ve been exposed for propagandist. What’s hilarious is they’re projecting their character traits upon conservatives who’re merely refuting their assertions. We have the facts and they have nothing but deceit and emotion.

The latest from the Charlotte Observer’s editorial board is hilarious. Isaac J. Bailey is in need of therapy and some heavy duty soul searching. I believe the diagnosis would be denial. Here is an excerpt from his emotional tirade:

Congratulations on your pyrrhic victories.

All it cost you was your integrity.

All you had to do was make a man who rose to national political prominence on open bigotry president of the United States.

And relinquish all credible claims of being the party of family values and faith.

And embrace policies that include stealing children from their parents, and maybe forever separating them.

And excuse a diabolical level of lying and misdirection.

And declare that morality and character and principles no longer matter.

You’ve mistaken bombast for bravery, cruelty for toughness, mockery as plain talk.

You’ve criminalized the desperation of the poor and oppressed and weaponized your fear.

You’ve demanded civil discourse in service of the uncivil and inhumane.

And you can’t even see it.


Was Mr. Bailey looking in the mirror when he wrote this screed? This is laughable. How dare this fool lecture us on morality and civil discourse when leftist all over the country are hunting and shouting down conservatives.


I don’t recall any moral outrage from the Charlotte Observer when the Obama administration wiped their ass on our Constitution and committed all sorts of felonies that we’re dealing with to this day. I guarantee you, hadn’t Donald Trump won the election we wouldn’t know about the crimes the Obama administration committed.



And how is it that Mr. Bailey can compartmentalize laws that were enacted during the Clinton administration and were practiced by Obama’s, but somehow demonizes President Trump. A liberal federal judge imposed this “consent decree” in 1997, whereby illegal alien families are to be separated. I didn’t hear this fool bitching about this then. And he dares lecture us on integrity?


I will agree with him on the following:

We are amid a reckoning. We are deciding who we want to be.

You must pick a side; each of us has to pick a side. None of us is exempt.

Choose wisely. But first make sure that decision is being made by the best part of you, not the worst.


My side believes in the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law; your’s is mob rule and the ends justifies the means. 

Oh, there will be a day of reckoning, and I believe both sides are looking forward to it.

Source:

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/opinion/editorials/article213654664.html

A River Runs Through the Courts

Is there no end to liberal stupidity? Every day we're confronted with a new case of activism that is completely devoid of reality. The latest Wonderland absurdity is: Rivers have rights. Here is an excerpt from The New Republic:


Last September, an unlikely plaintiff sued the state of Colorado: the Colorado River. The lawsuit, claiming that the state had violated the river’s right to flourish and regenerate, was filed by the environmental organization Deep Green Resistance, who brought the suit as next friends of the river. “Environmental law has failed to protect the natural environment because it accepts the status of nature and ecosystems as property,” DGR stated in the filing. The current law “merely regulat[es] the rate at which the natural environment is exploited.” They argued that the very existence of the river was at stake, and that the time had come for courts to recognize damage—not just to human users of the ecosystem, as law typically does, but to the ecosystem itself


Humans aren’t the only ones with rights, after all. In recent years courts have heard cases arguing that chimps, elephants, and other highly intelligent animals should have legal personhood. In India, Ecuador, and New Zealand, courts and legislatures have recently recognized some special rivers as having their own legal rights—the time seemed ripe for DGR’s argument. In 2010, the Citizens United decision extended First Amendment rights to corporations. In 2014, the Hobby Lobby decision secured closely held corporations some measure of religious freedom. U.S. law has granted personhood to corporate entities, the suit argued. Why not ecological ones?


First Amendment rights are afforded to corporate entities because they are comprised of people who have a financial interest in laws and regulations that affect them and their business. A river is not a person. An animal is not a person. This shouldn’t be hard to understand.


Source:

https://newrepublic.com/article/148352/can-rivers-people-too

Liberal Ghouls Project Their Failures onto Patriotic Americans

I’m usually reticent about writing on the subject of mass shootings especially those committed by teenage sociopaths. What can one say about these acts of evil? Apparently plenty if you’re a libtard.


As soon as the news broke on this heinous crime, gun-grabbers were hyperventilating with excitement as the body count climbed in Parkland, Florida. These ghouls were quick to unholster their usual bromides: Ban assault weapons! It’s the NRA’s fault! We must do something!


These acts of evil have become endemic and why is that? Prior to the 1990’s I cannot recall school shootings. The only one close was the University of Texas tower massacre back in 1966 and that’s it.


Something has happened to our culture. Something evil has been brewing for a long time and the stench is emanating from a liberal counterculture that has forsaken Christian morality and has no respect for our institutions and the American creed.


It’s bad enough that we have to sit by and watch liberals turn our culture into a cesspool, but we also have to endure their projections of blame. I’ve never seen a people so clueless about the hell they’ve created. They’re in complete denial.


The Charlotte Observer’s editorial board once again gives flesh to this rotting corpse. Billy Maddalon, a contributing columnist at the Disturber, not only danced around the dead at Parkland, he also took this opportunity to mock the notion of American exceptionalism. Here is an except:


Our history books teach us America was once the best in the world at virtually everything. True or not, we have always clung to a belief in “American exceptionalism” – that we’re different, better, smarter, because God wants it to be that way. It’s blatant national narcissism. To seem rather than to be. And it’s slowly destroying our nation.



Mr. Maddalon not only trashed our country, he has the nerve to project liberal failures on the rest of us. Take a look at this:



America’s current reality is sobering: Our expensive health system is one of the worst underperformers in the industrialized world (17th out of 37); Our education system is one of the worst (25th out of 37); Our mental health systems are fragmented and underfunded, with an opioid epidemic raging out of control in our rural communities. We also are the most violent country in the industrialized world (with gun homicide rates that are 25 times higher than our peers).



What ideology has taken over our healthcare and educational systems? It sure as hell isn’t conservatives. We tried to stop Obamacare.  And if I’m not mistaken the cities that have the highest homicide rates are ran by Democrats. You want to point fingers about this opioid epidemic? There is a direct correlation between the expansion of Medicaid and this crises. Again, can you say Obamacare, Mr. Maddalon? Hmmmm…


Mr. Maddalon tied his anti-American screed with the Parkland shooting in a nice, little bow with the following:


Gun violence has become a metaphor, a symptom of a much more insidious problem. We’ve somehow convinced ourselves that this, like so many other issues, is just going to magically go away, that the gun violence on our streets and mass shootings in houses of worship, night clubs, theaters, universities, schools and malls is just some kind of phase we’re going through.


All of these problems persist because we refuse to learn from what other countries have done to solve these same challenges. Remember, we’re different, better, smarter, we’re exceptional. Screw the facts!



The facts, Mr. Maddalon, is that everyone of the problems you brought forth were created by liberals. Liberals, like you, have trashed our culture and our country. You’ve contaminated the minds of our youth with hatred for Christian morality and the American creed. And you have the audacity to lecture us about learning from other countries? Why don’t you and your fellow libtards learn from your mistakes and stop projecting your failures unto the rest of us.


Source:

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/opinion/editorials/article200624974.html

Liberals Finally Debunking Healthcare Myths

I know I can safely say there are times when conservatives are stupefied at how dense and illogical liberals can be and it seems to be happening on a daily basis.  These people have no moorings in common sense even when it comes down to something as basic as gender.  If you’re confused about your sex just check your pants.  Are you packing or not?  Case closed.


The same applies to healthcare. Barack Obama peddled a falsehood that the uninsured clogged up the ER and that Medicaid expansion would alleviate this costly last resort.  The Oregon study refuted this assertion a number of years ago.  The Washington Post finally came around to those conclusions.  Here is an excerpt:  



“It would be nice if giving people insurance did get them so healthy and so much access to other care that they didn’t need to go to the emergency department, but that does not seem to be the case,” said Katherine Baicker, dean of the University of Chicago’s Harris School of Public Policy. “It seems clear to me that expanding insurance, in and of itself, does not contain spending. It increases spending, by giving people who had very limited access to care the ability to get their health-care needs met.”


Having insurance doesn’t lower the cost of healthcare either.  We’ve been saying that for years as well.  And what about preventive care?  Does that save money?  Apparently, not:


“It turns out, when you do the math, it’s just very tough to save money when you’re doing things to improve quality. It’s very hard to save a dollar when you spend a dollar,” said J. Michael McWilliams, a professor of health-care policy at Harvard Medical School. “Why has this become such a widespread notion — that we can sort of coordinate our way out of the cost problem? One reason is that it’s a much easier conversation to have: We can all subscribe to this notion of prevention saves money and care coordination saves money — and we don’t have to talk about regulating prices, or breaking up monopolies.”


The so-called Affordable Care Act isn’t so affordable.  This law actually created monopolies which exasperated healthcare cost.  But conservatives knew that.  We tried to warn them.  It’s unfortunate that we have to live through the dystopian world liberals have created for us.  It’s about damn time these mental patients checked their pants before they drag the rest of us through their looking glass.

Source:

Washington Post

Liberal Media are Derelict Vessels

Fake news everywhere and rarely a drop of truth in sight. Is it any wonder, American citizens are tuning out the mainstream media and seeking alternative news outlets? Yet, liberals have the nerve to decry polarization and a complete breakdown in trust when their propaganda has been refuted time after time after time - ad nauseum.


King Obama recently lamented on David Letterman’s show that Americans no longer have a baseline of facts and that we are living under two different information universes. Well, the simple fact, President Pen and Phone, is progressives have infiltrated and bastardized long trusted and revered institutions. Intrigue and deception are corrosive. People will eventually seek a different vessel if the one they’ve depended on for years has been compromised and its hull breached and crumbled. Eventually, those institutions become derelict eye sores.


Yesterday, I was sitting at a lunch counter reading a book when I overheard a conversation about Donald Trump allegedly paying a pornstar hush money over a sexual encounter. This was the first time I’ve heard this and it didn’t take a second thought to completely dismiss this as nonsense. Yet, these two gentlemen apparently believed it.

 


I went home and sure enough, Newsweek and other outlets are running with this story. However, later that day,Stormy Daniels refuted this report as complete nonsense. All I have to say is: Thank God for alternative news sources.


Let’s face the facts, the media has never been a truthful institution to begin with. The book I was reading at the lunch counter just happened to underscore the dishonesty of newspaper reporters especially when it comes to their political foes.

George Henry White was a black, republican congressman in North Carolina during the late 1800’s. He ended up being the last African-American to hold a national office before Jim Crow became institutionalized in the South. The attacks on this man is reminiscent of what is happening to President Donald Trump. Here is an excerpt:


Newspaper accounts of the infamous “circus incident” vary, but there seems little doubt that George White, either alone or in the company of a group of w0men and children, did attend John H. Sparks’s circus in his hometown of Tarboro on October 8. Perhaps he was seeking relief from the heat of the campaign, but if so, he found little solace inside the tent. The Greenville Reflector reported that White “took a seat among the white people.” refusing to move when requested and “saying he was as good as the white people and that he would not sit with the negroes.” Four policemen and twenty circus employees later, White and his entourage left the tent voluntarily but still protesting, according to the Reflector. Not content with simply reprinting this account, the News and Observer quickly sought out at least five Tarboro whites to sign affidavits affirming and embellishing the tale of the “great big black burly, leader of the fusion forces in North Carolina” and his demand for social equality: their affidavits were the basis for a longer follow-up story two days later.


Yet the entire story was outlandish at best. George White may have attended the circus, but the Tarboro Southerner made no reference to any such incident in its next edition, even after the intervening reports had been published.


And then this, a couple of paragraphs later:


The origin of the circus story is as difficult to fathom as one that appeared two weeks later in the Wilmington Messenger, supposedly involving 150 Lenoir County “Rough Riders” who had physically prevented George white from disembarking his train in Kinston for a campaign speech. Even the Kinston Free press called the story “a fake” and White publicly denied that anyone in Kinston had intimidated him. Yet a week later, a new type of intimidation appeared in the News and Observer in the form of an article accusing members of White’s family of fomenting racial strife and planning to commit armed violence; Josephus Daniels’s newspaper had in effect declared war on George White six days before the midterm election.


Doesn’t this sound familiar? We have a media who has declared war on President Trump and his family and they have no compunction or scruples in their quest to drive him out of office.


By the way, George White ended up leaving public office and the state of North Carolina. Here is an excerpt from his last speech to the United States House of Representatives about the tactics of the Democratic Party:


It would be unfair, however, for me to leave the inference upon the minds of those who hear me that all of the white people of the State of North Carolina hold views with Mr. KITCHIN and think as he does. Thank God there are many noble exceptions to the example he sets, that, too, in the Democratic party; men who have never been afraid that one uneducated, poor, depressed negro could put to flight and chase into degradation two educated, wealthy, thrifty white men. There never has been, nor ever will be, any negro domination in that State, and no one knows it any better than the Democratic party. It is a convenient howl, however, often resorted to in order to consummate a diabolical purpose by scaring the weak and gullible whites into support of measures and men suitable to the demagogue and the ambitious office seeker, whose crave for office overshadows and puts to flight all other considerations, fair or unfair.


Congressman White concluded:


Now, Mr. Chairman, before concluding my remarks I want to submit a brief recipe for the solution of the so-called American negro problem. He asks no special favors, but simply demands that he be given the same chance for existence, for earning a livelihood, for raising himself in the scales of manhood and womanhood that are accorded to kindred nationalities. Treat him as a man; go into his home and learn of his social conditions; learn of his cares, his troubles, and his hopes for the future; gain his confidence; open the doors of industry to him; let the word "negro," "colored," and "black" be stricken from all the organizations enumerated in the federation of labor.

Help him to overcome his weaknesses, punish the crime-committing class by the courts of the land, measure the standard of the race by its best material, cease to mold prejudicial and unjust public sentiment against him, and my word for it, he will learn to support, hold up the hands of, and join in with that political party, that institution, whether secular or religious, in every community where he lives, which is destined to do the greatest good for the greatest number. Obliterate race hatred, party prejudice, and help us to achieve nobler ends, greater results, and become more satisfactory citizens to our brother in white.


This, Mr. Chairman, is perhaps the negroes' temporary farewell to the American Congress; but let me say, Phoenix-like he will rise up some day and come again. These parting words are in behalf of an outraged, heart-broken, bruised, and bleeding, but God-fearing people, faithful, industrious, loyal people--rising people, full of potential force.


Mr. Chairman, in the trial of Lord Bacon, when the court disturbed the counsel for the defendant, Sir Walter Raleigh raised himself up to his full height and, addressing the court, said: Sir, I am pleading for the life of a human being.


The only apology that I have to make for the earnestness with which I have spoken is that I am pleading for the life, the liberty, the future happiness, and manhood suffrage for one-eighth of the entire population of the United States.


The media in North Carolina during George White’s time was as dishonest as the mainstream media is today. Their baseline of truth is just as biased and deceitful as the white supremacist were in the late 1800’s and they will do anything to destroy their political opponents. But truth, just like the Phoenix in George White’s speech will rise from the ashes despite the duplicity of Democrats and their scribes in the press.



Sources:

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/12/former-president-barack-obama-warns-on-polarizing-media-us-electoral-system.html


http://www.newsweek.com/who-stormy-daniels-trump-paid-former-porn-star-stephanie-clifford-130k-keep-780251?yptr=yahoo



http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/12/trump-rep-former-porn-star-deny-hush-money-claims.html



https://www.ncdcr.gov/blog/2016/01/29/phoenix-speech-by-george-white-1901/



http://docsouth.unc.edu/nc/whitegh/whitegh.html

Liberal Myth: Blue States are Donor States

We’ve all heard the braggadocious complaints from blue state progressives about being net contributors to the federal coffers.  These so-called elites resent all those ingrates in flyover country who take more from Washington D.C. then they give.  Well, we’re finding out this is just another big lie perpetuated by a band of thumb suckers.  We can thank the Trump administration for exposing this liberal myth.  Here is an excerpt from USA Today:

Trump’s new tax plan would hit blue states hardest, by eliminating the federal deductibility of state income and property taxes. That’s going to make it harder for blue states to maintain the high tax rates they’ve traditionally levied.

Right now, if you pay state property or income taxes, you can deduct them against your federal income taxes. In effect, it means that if you’re in a high federal bracket, your state taxes may be offset by that federal deduction to the tune of 40% or more.

End the federal deduction, though, and high state taxes come straight out of taxpayers’ pockets with no offset.  As economist Nicole Kaeding told The Hill, by allowing deductions for state taxes, “the federal government is essentially subsidizing high tax rates in states like California and New York.”

Whoa!  Did I read that correctly?  If I’m not mistaken, Americans are subsidizing states like California and New York to a tune of about 40% or more.  I believe it’s time for these self-proclaimed elites to get off of their high horses and forgo all of those “loopholes” they level at everyone else.  What’s that saying, “Paying taxes is the highest form of patriotism”? Time to pay up, libtards.

Source:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/05/01/trump-test-democrats-tax-patriotism-glenn-reynolds/101159082/

https://costonscomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/01/californias-progressivism-responsible.html?m=0

San Fran Conservatives Stay in Closet for Fear of Liberals

Conservatives in San Francisco stay in the closet out of fear of being outed by “tolerant” liberals.

SAN FRANCISCO (KPIX 5) — Some East Bay conservatives say they live a secret life. They can never tell anyone what they really feel like in fear of their safety.

Robert Ward is coming out conservative, but in a place he says is risky for those who share his beliefs.

“If you witness what happened in Berkeley, actually they are so violent on top of it. I mean being a conservative in the Bay Area is like being a heretic,” says Ward. “You lead a double life. You can never tell your friends and co-workers.”

Welcome to liberal America.  And we’re the ones who are supposed to be intolerant?

Source:

http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2017/02/04/bay-area-conservatives-host-secret-meetups-fearing-for-their-safety/

Liberal Shoots "White Supremacist" at a Gay Conservative Event

It’s time to face the facts, the two groups who commit violence, mayhem; murder and destruction of property are liberals and Muslims.  Both groups subscribe to a totalitarian ideology and have no regard for others who disagree with them.

Let’s put aside the wanton destruction of property at President Donald Trump’s inaugural and take a look at the latest outrage.  A libtard attended an event which featured gay conservative, Milo Yiannopoulos at Washington State University and shot who he thought was a “white supremacist.”  That’s outrageous enough, but it gets better.  The police let him go.  Here is an excerpt from the Daily Caller:

The shooter turned himself in Friday night after police put out a lookout, but he was released without charges “after telling investigators he fired in self-defense during a campus protest,” the Seattle Times reported. The lookout described the suspect as an Asian man in his fifties.

“One of the law-enforcement officials said the man who fired the gun claimed he had been assaulted before shooting the other man, whom he believed to be some type of white supremacist,” the report said.

The shooter was then “released pending investigation,” it said. Police did not name the shooter.

They said the 32-year-old victim had a “life-threatening gunshot wound to the abdomen.”

Come to find out, the victim is another libtard.  This is a case of mistaken identity.  These people are absolutely insane.

Source: 

http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/22/milo-protester-shoots-suspected-conservative-no-charges-after-he-points-to-racism/#ixzz4WWmlBYHH

Liberals Figure Out the Rural vs. Urban Divide

The New York Times finally published an insightful article on our great rural vs. urban divide.  I have to hand it to the writer, who just happens to be a libtard living amongst patriotic Americans, on his grasp of the values that distinguish Republicans from Democrats.

How many times have we heard progressives like Barack Obama and Senator Chuck E. Schumer lecture us on our common, American values?  I laugh out loud when I hear this crap.  What values do these people have that is comparable to ours?  I say very little if nothing at all, and so does the liberal who wrote this op-ed.  Here is an excerpt:

Knoxville, Iowa — One recent morning, I sat near two young men at a coffee shop here whom I’ve known since they were little boys. Now about 18, they pushed away from the table, and one said: “Let’s go to work. Let the liberals sleep in.” The other nodded.

They’re hard workers. As a kid, one washed dishes, took orders and swept the floor at a restaurant. Every summer, the other picked sweet corn by hand at dawn for a farm stand and for grocery stores, and then went to work all day on his parents’ farm. Now one is a welder, and the other is in his first year at a state university on an academic scholarship. They are conservative, believe in hard work, family, the military and cops, and they know that abortion and socialism are evil, that Jesus Christ is our savior, and that Donald J. Trump will be good for America.

They are part of a growing movement in rural America that immerses many young people in a culture — not just conservative news outlets but also home and church environments — that emphasizes contemporary conservative values. It views liberals as loathsome, misinformed and weak, even dangerous.

That pretty much sums it up.  However, I would emphasize the word, dangerous.  Conservatives have known this for decades.  We also know what liberals think about us.  So this article is really not a revelation.  What’s surprising is they’re just now figuring it out for themselves.   

Source:

http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/05/opinion/why-rural-america-voted-for-trump.html?smid=fb-share&_r=1

Liberal Hysteria Over Trump Presidency

I’ve come to the conclusion Liberals are irredeemable morons.  This opinion is reinforced with every op-ed I read and conversation I have with libtards.  This morning I once again engaged my neighbor about the prospect of a “living wage.”  I asked him if the minimum wage were raised to $15 per hour would the rest of us see a bump that is commiserate.  He said yes.

Now think about that.  If everyone is going to get a raise then what’s the point?  These fools needlessly raised the price of goods and services and to what end?  The obvious answer is skilled workers will not get a raise and their standard of living will be lowered.   And we’re supposed to believe Democrats are the champions of the middle-class?  My ass!

Now, let’s take a gander at how Progressives view the United States under a Trump administration.  It is hysterical in more ways than one.  These yahoos are projecting the failures of the Obama administration on a New York liberal who isn’t a Clinton.  Here is an excerpt from an op-ed published in the Dallas Morning News written by Dick Meyer, a chief Washington correspondent for Scripps Washington Bureau.

Churchill's second volume covers Great Britain during the German blitz in 1940, "the most splendid, as it was the most deadly, year in our long English and British history." He called the book, "The Finest Hour."

Will Americans muster a fine hour of our own and defeat the gathered storm that Trump is riding and stoking?

I pose this question to two men in particular: George Herbert Walker Bush and George Walker Bush, America's only living former presidents from the Republican Party.

The two ex-presidents' silence at this historic juncture, to my thinking, is a weak, unpatriotic abdication of their moral duty. I hope against hope that I am dead wrong and they are waiting for the perfect moment to step forward and take a bold, unequivocal stand and join the battle to the end.

Would it make a difference in the vote if the 41st and 43rd presidents opposed Trump full throttle? If they went all the way and endorsed Hillary Clinton? I certainly think so, but I wouldn't bet huge big money on it in this year of unreason.

But I do know this. No voice, no preacher, no leader and no coalition so far have been able to geld Trump and make America sane again.

Now that is hilarious!  This idiot has a wild sense of what is patriotic.  When I think of patriotism it sure as hell doesn’t include the Clintons or Barack Obama.  These scoundrels have an actual track record of selling the American people out.  These people are proven traitors!  They should be in prison.

Once again, do we have to point out this Iranian deal?  Or, how about Hillary Clintons self-dealing through the State Department, does that concern this fool?  Does Mr. Meyer remember the Clintons selling our missile technology to the Chinese in lieu of campaign donations?  Charlie Tree, anyone?

But this moron goes on.

Complacent, worldly wise assurances that our mighty republic will survive a Trump regime are lame; sure, the country will survive, but the likely harms to the worst-off Americans -- and immigrants, race relations, civil rights, economic equality, national security, our national standing and our basic dignity -- are unthinkable.

Did Dick Meyer just land on planet Earth?  He just described Barack Obama’s presidency.  These people are completely devoid of circumspection?  You have to laugh at their idiocy.   

Here is a picture that sums up the United States' standing in the world under Barack Obama’s presidency.  This says it all.

Source:

http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/latest-columns/20160916-calling-on-bush-to-support-clinton.ece

Liberals Suppress Logic on Voter ID and Early Voting

Liberals are amusing.  They’ll argue on a subject with a righteous certainty and indignation without understanding the topic at hand.  One only has to read the comments section in the News and Observer to get a taste of their twisted logic.

The subject, once again, was voter ID and early voting.  Liberals believe requiring an ID and limiting the number of days is suppression.  Here is a short blurb on how that conversation went.

 Tom Eller

The liberal Dumbocrats would have people voting at the mall 7 days a week if they thought they could gain some illegal votes! There are implications to added voting days of cost and personnel, none of which is a right, but added onto again and again! It's called ELECTION DAY for a reason folks!

Like · Reply · 1 · Sep 9, 2016 5:03am

Thomas Parker · 

Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina

TomE: No, what is happening is conservaturds are throwing roadblocks in the way of legal voters. There is nothing sacred about the second Tuesday in November. Why ban Sunday voting? I'l give you a hint, bigot- Souls to the polls!

Like · Reply · 6 · Sep 9, 2016 7:09am

Tom Eller

Thomas Parker, what about ELECTION DAY do you not understand?

  

Paul Maxwell · 

University of Virginia

Tom Eller Here's the part that YOU do not understand. In 1792, federal law permitted each state to conduct presidential elections in the state (i.e., to choose their electors) at any time in a 34-day period before the first Wednesday of December, which was the day set for the meeting of the electors of the U.S. president and vice-president (the Electoral College), in their respective states. In 1845 the 34 day period was reduced to 29 days, making November 2 the earliest and November 8 the latest day for us to cast our own votes. So, ELECTION DAY is actually the first Wednesday in December. The individual states can have as many days as they wish to allow citizens to vote before the appropriate Tuesday in November. Of course, if you were home schooled, or only listen to FOX or Rush, or only read Brietbart or Drudge, you might not be aware of some aspects of American History, or of our Constitution.

Aside from all that, the GOP in NC is most certainly attempting voter suppression and by now are making no bones about it.They must be scared sh*tless

So, we have a genius from the University of Virginia lecturing North Carolinians on the Electoral College, which no one was discussing, yet conceding that individual states can determine the time frame citizens are allowed to vote. But of course, according to Paul Maxwell, republicans are uneducated, racist pigs trying to suppress the vote.   

You have to laugh at these people.  

Source:

http://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/editorials/article100736512.html