British Jews Flee Anti-Semitism in U.K.

‘Never again.’  You would have thought after the horrors of World War II and the Holocaust, Jews could live without fear of being murdered in the streets.  But once again, anti-Semitism has raised its ugly head in Europe.  This new wave of hatred is due, in part, to a flood of Muslim immigrants.  Even the U.K. isn’t safe anymore.

A British family is fleeing to the United States.  The Gould family no longer feels safe in a country that has been home for four generations.  The rise of anti-Semitism is palpable and very real.  The U.K. Telegraph reported the following:

London and Greater Manchester bore the brunt of the increase, with Manchester seeing a 79 per cent rise. One incident cited in the report involved the daubing of swastikas and the term “Jewish slag” on gravestones at a Jewish cemetery in Manchester. Greater Manchester Police says it has stepped up patrols.

The findings are borne out by the Goulds’ experience. “The other week, I was standing in the queue at a large supermarket in Manchester when the man in front of me said, 'F------ Jews, they’re all over the place. They’re thieves, they are taking over our property. They’re everywhere,’ ” says Honey. “I’ve no idea if he knew I was Jewish or not, but I was absolutely terrified, and fled.”

Then a Jewish neighbour’s son who was wearing his kippa (skull cap) was slapped in the street by a white Polish man, who “just sprang forward and hit him”.

Honey says: “I know there are plenty of people who simply want to live a peaceful coexistence. But there is so much anti‑Semitism in Britain, and it’s coming from all sides. Our local Jewish schools look like prison camps. They’re surrounded by wire fences. There are guards on patrol, some with dogs. On Saturdays, you see police walking the street with members of the CST. I don’t want to sit at home panicking when my husband goes to the synagogue. I just want to live in peace.

 

The handwriting is on the wall. 

“I am the fourth generation of Jew in my family to live in Britain,” he says. “Britain offered a safe haven, a chance for them to raise a family, build a home. I am eternally grateful for the refuge Britain and its government has given to the Jews. But I can’t help feeling that the future is no longer here. The grandfather of one Jewish friend said 'It’s time to leave when you are no longer free to sit on a park bench’. I think that time is fast approaching. I’m leaving before I’m told that I have to go.”

We just commemorated the 70^th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz.  Have we learned nothing?  Shame on the world for this irrational hatred.  Shame on Europe and the U.K. for allowing this to happen.

Source:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/11393427/Were-leaving-Britain-Jews-arent-safe-here-any-more.html

http://70.auschwitz.org/index.php?lang=en

The Progressive Gospels

After watching a number of documentaries on Hitler’s Germany, I’m struck by the parallel ideologies of the Nazis and the Progressives. Both believe in the evolutionary principles of Darwin and in doing so they had to destroy the pillars of Western civilization in the name of progress.

One of the first institutions both attacked is traditional values. The Nazis believed that the children belonged to the State. We’re witnessing the same kind of attitude with liberals. Progressives don’t believe parents have a say in their child’s education, or how they’re raised. Recently, a professor and commentator at MSNBC proclaimed that your kids belong to the collective.


 

The Nazis instituted the Hitler Youth and Lebensborn program, which was designed for the sole purpose of raising the birthrate of Aryan children.  The Progressives, however, instituted the welfare state, enslaving single mothers (and their children) to a lifetime of dependency, and now they're attacking the time honored tradition of a marriage between one man and one woman.

Both the Nazi and Progressive ideologies despise Christianity.   Heinrich Himmler proclaimed he wanted to pull it out by the roots.  Progressives are doing the same by shunning and silencing Christians who dare profess their religion, or say a prayer in a public forum by using the courts as a weapon.  Their contempt for Christianity is as virulent as any of Hitler’s Nazis.

Both had to revise history in order to implement their ideologies.  The above video goes into detail on the Nazis referendum.  Progressives, on the other hand, had to distort and dishonor our founding principles and documents, and especially those who fought for our independence.  They have successfully replaced our founders’ constitution with their own.  Hence, their Darwinian premise of a living and breathing constitution. 

Both have abused science.  The Nazis used all sorts of crackpot theories to advance their sense of superiority, such as Hanns Horbiger’s “World Ice Theory.”  Click on the link below for this wild nonsense.  The Progressives, in turn, advanced their Global Warming scheme in order to subjugate and control the population.  This lie is being refuted daily.

 

Finally, both advocated and implemented eugenics.  Germany and the United States sterilized and warehoused millions of their citizens.  The final solution for the Nazis was the Holocaust.  The Progressives have Planned Parenthood and abortions.  Their style isn’t on the same level of horror as a concentration camp, but their disdain for life and their fellow human beings is just as reprehensible.  If anyone has any doubts about that, I suggest you read about the atrocities at Kermit Gosnell’s clinic.
 

 

The Progressives will hoot and holler about this comparison.  But the facts are the facts and as much as they want, they can’t distort this part of their history. 

Source:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensborn

http://thirdreichocculthistory.blogspot.com/2011_07_01_archive.html

N.C. Illegal Aliens Cry Havoc and Let Slip the Holocaust

Cry havoc and let slip the Holocaust.  Illegal aliens, Democrats, La Raza and the ACLU are screaming about the branding of North Carolina driver’s licenses designated to those who’ve been warranted deferment status by an unconstitutional decree by our lord and master: Barack Hussein Obama. 

Listen to this new entitlement class howl.  Here are some examples of the righteous indignation of a non-citizen living in the United States:

Across the top of the new license is a pink strip. In the center, red capital letters say, “NO LAWFUL STATUS.”

On the side, another set of red capital letters say, “LIMITED TERM,” referring to the license holder’s two-year reprieve from deportation.

According to Moises Serrano, a Yadkin County immigrant activist who has applied for deferred action, the design is similar to the Star of David that Jews were forced to wear in Germany under the Nazi regime.

“This singles me out,” Serrano said. “Imagine trying to get on a flight at the airport, and you have to use this license. It’s an invasion of my privacy. I am undocumented and unashamed, but I say that on my terms.”

Do you get that?  Moises Serrano is undocumented and unashamed, and we will accept his terms!  We’re a bunch of Nazis for valuing our citizenship; and relegating this poor supplicant as the Jew in the punch bowl.  Wow, we are just a bunch of imperialist Americans infringing on his world-citizenship status.  He has a human right to squat wherever he pleases; except of course to go back to his native country.  How dare we Americans “invade his privacy”?

Of course, the ACLU and 100 law professors have stated that the Obama decree is legal.  But no one should trust this so-called civil rights organization and today’s academia when it comes to our Constitution, and it seems that North Carolina House Republicans have cast a suspect eye on such protestations, with good reason.  Article One; Section Eight gives Congress sole authority when it comes to rules of naturalization.   Proponents for an authoritarian government argue the following:

Nearly 100 law professors from top universities nationwide, including Wake Forest University, signed a letter last summer advising Obama that the executive branch has the authority to defer deportation of young immigrants -- just weeks before the president announced plans to do so.

“General authority for deferred action exists under the Immigration and Nationality Act ... which grants the Secretary of Homeland Security the authority to enforce the immigration laws,” the letter saids. “Though no statutes or regulations delineate deferred action in specific terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has made clear that decisions to initiate or terminate enforcement proceedings fall squarely within the authority of the Executive."

But they refused to acknowledge the limitations the Executive has when it comes to deferments.   The Volokh Conspiracy blog gave the best explanation:
     
There are at least a couple ways in which the Executive Branch has afforded groups of aliens blanket relief from deportation. One is Temporary Protected Status, which allows the Secretary of Homeland Security to “designate a foreign country for TPS due to conditions in the country that temporarily prevent the country’s nationals from returning safely, or in certain circumstances, where the country is unable to handle the return of its nationals adequately.” That said, I’m not sure TPS serves as that good of a precedent for the recently announced program, because TPS is conducted under express congressional authorization in the form of 8 U.S.C. § 1254a. There isn’t comparable express authorization for the recently announced program; indeed, the Administration sought such authorization and Congress demurred.

A better precedent for the Executive Branch to act unilaterally is Deferred Enforced Departure. As explained on the CIS website), DED is a “temporary, discretionary, administrative stay of removal granted to aliens from designated countries.”

Unlike TPS, DED emanates from the President’s constitutional powers to conduct foreign relations and has no statutory basis. (Because DED is not a statutory provision under the Immigration and Nationality Act it is not considered an immigration status.) The President designates DED for nationals of a particular country through either an Executive Order or a Presidential Memorandum.

As some proponents of the President’s action are quick to note, President Bush issued a Memorandum to Secretary Chertoff on September 12, 2007, granting deferred enforced departure to certain Liberians for a period of 18 months. See 43 Weekly Comp. Pres. Documents 1203 (Sept. 12, 2007). (While at OLC, I reviewed that Memorandum.)

But it’s not clear that Deferred Enforced Departure is a close fit as a precedent either, because it traditionally has been used only temporarily to prevent aliens from having to return to areas suffering from disturbances. It has been employed as an exercise of the President’s power to conduct the foreign relations of the United States, and it’s not self-evident that same power would permit the President to indefinitely suspend deportation for a much larger group of aliens who don’t confront the same circumstances in their countries of citizenship. That starts to sound more like Congress’s power “[t]o establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,” U.S. Const. art I, § 8 cl.4. Indeed, this purportedly leaked DHS draft memo discussing the issue way back in February 2010 recognizes that this sort of program “would represent use of deferred action on a scale far beyond its limited class-based uses in the past.” (Careful readers will note the facial reason to doubt the memo’s authenticity—it purports to be a DHS document, and yet it’s time-stamped 5pm on a Friday.*)

This wouldn’t be the first time Obama has used unconstitutional means for political expediency.

 Source:  http://www.journalnow.com/news/state_region/article_c2edaaa8-7bc4-11e2-860d-0019bb30f31a.html

http://www.journalnow.com/news/local/article_27c689c6-7c8e-11e2-991e-001a4bcf6878.html

http://www.volokh.com/2012/06/22/president-obamas-deferred-action-on-immigration-and-olc/

The Dichotomy of Good and Evil

The Dichotomy of Good and Evil never changes.  Politics can't whitewash history.  No matter how hard the Progressives scrub their dirty laundry on the washboard of good intentions.