Rush Limbaugh: Globalist Elites to Erase Concept of Citizenship

A couple of weeks ago, I read an article about American citizens residing in Mexico and the possible tax problems they may encounter with the IRS. The take-away paragraph, in essence, stated Mexico employs a residency tax, whereas, the United States taxes citizens. To my chagrin, I saved this article and now I can’t find it, because this would’ve tied in perfectly with what I heard on the Rush Limbaugh Show.

We’ve all come to the conclusion that elite snobs throughout the country have nothing but contempt for American citizens. This attitude has become overt in institutions like the Democratic party and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. They make no bones about it. The only way to rule America is to diminish citizenship by relegating us to mere residents. Here is an excerpt from today’s show:

But what the objective is, over time — and do not doubt me on this — the objective is to erase concept of citizenship altogether and replace it with simple residency so you become an American simply because you’re here, however you got here, you’re an American, entitling you to everything, all of the benefits, quote, unquote, that Americans are entitled to.

And if you live in the Netherlands, then you’re not a citizen there. You are a resident, and you live in the Netherlands. And so the globalists — Amy, you’re right — they want to erase, obliterate all of the cultural norms that have been used to identify and distinguish for legitimate purposes people all over the world. They want to obliterate all of those. And the reason is to take away any unique identity from everybody.

If you take away everybody’s unique identity and deny them the opportunity to be who they are, such as deny them the opportunity to be a legitimate American, then you have that much of an easier job to control everybody, which, make no mistake, is what the globalist objective is all about. It’s total control and power over people to get the desired outcome you want for yourself, and to hell with the people whose outcomes you are deciding.

They are mere fodder. The population at large, en masse, is merely a mechanism to achieve what you want. This is a total move by elites to further distance themselves from people they think average, ordinary, common, and beneath them. And it’s a worldwide movement that is headed up by aristocratic elites in European and American capitals. And it’s been underway for a while. These are the people threatened when they hear Donald Trump talking about making America great again. Amy, thanks again for the call. Appreciate it.

Now that is excellence in broadcasting.

Source:

https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2019/07/10/the-globalists-are-sick-of-american-winning/

Illegal Aliens Affect Electoral College

Illegal immigration is insidious in more ways than one.  Pundits tend to focus on the impact they have on local communities.  What no one talks about is the ramifications these diasporas have on our federal elections and the way politicians pander to non-citizens who have garnered as much representation in the halls of Congress as an American citizen.

The Center for Immigration Studies published a report demonstrating the influence illegal aliens and legal non-citizens have in the distribution of congressional districts and ultimately deciding presidential elections via the Electoral College.  Here is an excerpt:

Non-citizens Have Large Impact. Immigration has a significant effect on the distribution of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives for three reasons. First, seats are apportioned based on each state's total population relative to the rest of the country, including illegal aliens and other non-citizens. This, of course, is the issue at the center of Congresswomen Miller's proposal. Second, congress has chosen to allow in a large number of legal immigrants and to tolerate wide spread illegal immigration. After the 2000 Census, the average congressional district had roughly 650,000 people. Thus, the more than 18 million non-citizens in the 2000 Census were equal to nearly 29 congressional seats. The third reason is that non-citizens are not evenly distributed throughout the country. In 2000, half of all non-citizens lived in just three states and almost 70 percent live in just six states. States with a large non-citizen population will gain at the expense of states comprised mostly of citizens.

Impact of Non-Citizens on Apportionment. In a report entitled, "Remaking the Political Landscape: The Impact of Illegal and Legal Immigration on Congressional Apportionment," published by the Center for Immigration Studies in October of 2003, we calculated the impact of non-citizens on the distribution of seats in the House.⁵ Overall we found that the presence of non-citizens caused a total of nine seats to change hands. Indiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin each lost a seat that they had prior to the 2000 Census while Montana, Kentucky and Utah each failed to gain a seat they other wise would have gained, but for the presences non-citizens in other states. Of the nine seats redistributed by non-citizens, 6 went to California, while Texas, New York and Florida each gained a seat and New York retained a seat it otherwise would have lost. Analysis of this kind is very straightforward, involving a simple calculation of the apportionment of seats to states with non-citizens included and then without them. Other researchers have come to the same conclusion.⁶

Impact of Illegal Aliens. In our 2003 apportionment study we also tried to estimate the impact of illegal aliens by themselves. The former INS has estimated the size and state distribution of illegals who responded to the Census, and we used those figures to estimate their impact on the distribution of House seats. We found that of the nine states that lost seats due to non-citizens, four were the result of illegals. This makes perfect sense because 40 to 45 percent of non-citizens are illegal aliens. Indiana, Michigan, and Mississippi each lost one seat in the House and Montana failed to gain a seat it otherwise would have gained because of illegal aliens in other states.

Impact on Electoral College. Immigration and the resulting non-citizen population not only redistributes seats in the House, it has the same effect on presidential elections because the apportionment of the Electoral College is based on the same basic calculations as congressional delegations. Thus immigration policy and the resulting large non-citizen population it produces impacts the distribution of political influence both in Congress and in the Executive.

We need to reform the way congressional districts are apportioned.  States with a high concentration of illegal aliens and legal non-citizen residents will lose their influence, not only in the halls of Congress, but in deciding presidential elections.  Can anyone say California?

Source:

http://cis.org/node/554

Feds Punish Business for "Citizenship-Discrimination"

We’ve all heard the fictional Republican war on women.  Tell a woman she has to pay for her own damn birth control, suddenly you’re denying her access to health care.  It’s a ridiculous premise.  

What isn’t ridiculous is the Democratic Party’s war on American citizenship.  Illegal aliens are swarming across our borders.  The DOJ, federal judiciary and Democratic politicians are scheming to grant defacto amnesty without the authorization of Congress.  And now, businesses are being sued for verifying the legal status of employees.

A Texas catering business will pay the United States $26,400 for engaging in “citizenship-discrimination,” as part of a settlement with the Justice Department announced Tuesday.

Culinaire International unlawfully discriminated against employees based on their citizenship status, the Justice Department claimed, because it required non-citizen employees to provide extra proof of their right to work in the United States.

Culinaire has agreed to pay the United States $20,460 in civil penalties, receive training in anti-discrimination rules of the Immigration and Nationality Act, revise its work eligibility verification process, and create a $40,000 back pay fund for “potential economic victims.”

“Employers cannot discriminate against workers by requiring them to produce more documents than necessary in the employment eligibility verification and reverification processes,” Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights division, Molly Moran, said in a statement.

A lawful permanent resident’s card expires, but their right to work is permanent, and in this case Culinaire was requiring employees to present a renewed permanent resident card to be verified as work-eligible. The Justice Department claimed this violated a provision in the INA that prohibits employers from requiring extra documentation from non-citizen employees.

So let’s get this straight.  An immigrant’s lawful residency expires, yet they don’t have to renew it and can work in the U.S. indefinitely and with impunity.  Does anyone else have a problem with this?  Didn’t the 9/11 hijackers exploit similar loopholes? 

Source: http://dailycaller.com/2014/09/02/feds-punish-business-for-engaging-in-citizenship-discrimination/#ixzz3CD8A4D7E

An Endless Parade of Liberal Horribles

It’s astonishing.  I come home from work, kick off my shoes, pop a beer, turn on the news, and watch an endless, liberal parade of horribles march across my television screen.  The aristocratic nature of our central government and the concomitant abuses by a contemptuous bureaucracy should outrage any American; but, to watch the evisceration of our borders and sovereignty is jaw dropping.

Governments and religious organizations, particularly the Catholic Church, are colluding to traffic illegal aliens to and in the United States.  It has been reported presidents of Guatemala and Mexico have made an agreement to grant 72 hour passes to citizens of Central American countries so they can make it to the U.S. border.  

The Obama administration is in on this trafficking scheme.  They advertised to contract their own coyotes back in January, and have asked dioceses to house illegals on the low-down.  The transnationalist in the Obama administration tried to hide their nefarious activities to no avail.

We have come to a tipping point.  We cannot have a mass of humanity invade this country without consequence.  Diasporas are the end result.  These people will not assimilate.  They will not become Americans.  They will join others who resent this country.  They will create a great leveling.  The end result is a third-world status.

When the Huns invaded Europe, they pushed Germanic tribes into the Roman Empire.  The end result was dissolution of Rome and the advent of the Dark Ages. 

Source:

http://www.examiner.com/article/mexico-made-deal-to-send-more-illegal-aliens-to-the-u-s

http://theconservativewife.blogspot.com/2014/06/government-hiring-escorts-for-65000.html

http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/05/border-meltdown-obama-delivering-290000-illegals-to-u-s-homes/

Transnationalist Demand Amnesty, Undermine National Sovereignty

It wasn’t so long ago, the Washington D.C. creatures tried to shove amnesty down our throats.  The American people stood up and shamed those politicians who dared to reward a group of people who have demonstrated their disregard for our laws and sovereignty.

A decade hasn’t passed, and the same people are at it again.  One vociferous advocate for amnesty is the Chamber of Commerce.  President and CEO, Tom Donohue, held a press conference demanding our elected officials do something to legitimize these illegal alien diasporas.  Here is the video.

A while back, I read Samuel P. Huntington’s book:  Who Are We?  The Challenges to America’s National Identity.   In it he addressed the motives and aspirations of transnational elites, whom have no allegiance to a nation state.  They see themselves as global citizens.  Here is an excerpt:

Economic transnationals are the nucleus of an emerging global superclass.  “As debates about global economic integration rage on, at least one of its effects has become clear,” the Global Business Policy Council asserts.  “The rewards of an increasingly integrated global economy have brought forth new global elite.  Labeled ‘Davos Men,’ ‘gold –collar workers’ or … ‘cosmocrats,’ this emerging class is empowered by new notions of global connectedness.  It includes academics, international civil servants, and executives in global companies, as well as successful high-technology entrepreneurs.”  Estimated to number about 20 million in 2000, of whom 40 percent were American, this elite is expected to double in size by 2010.  Less than 4 percent of the American people, these transnationals have little need for national loyalty, view national boundaries as obstacles that thankfully are vanishing, and see national governments as residues from the past whose only useful function now is to facilitate the elite’s global operations.  In the coming years, one corporate executive confidently predicted, “the only people who will care about national boundaries are politicians.”

Isn’t it interesting that Professor Huntington mentions “Davos Men”?  One of the biggest advocates for amnesty in the U.S. Senate is Senator John McCain.  Here he is with George Soros at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

Transnationalism is being taught at our colleges and universities.  Here is another excerpt, this time demonstrating academia’s role in undermining our sovereignty:

Professor Martha Nussbaum of the University of Chicago denounced emphasis on “patriotic pride” as “morally dangerous,” urged the ethical superiority of cosmopolitanism over patriotism, and argued that people should direct their “allegiance” to the “world community of human beings.”  Professor Amy Gutmann of Princeton argued that it was “repugnant” for American students to learn that they are, “above all, citizens of the United States or to some other politically sovereign community,” but to “democratic humanism.”  Professor Richard Sennett of New York University denounced “the evil of a shared national identity” and judged the erosion of national sovereignty “basically a positive phenomenon.”  Professor George Lipsitz of the University of California, San Diego, argued that “in recent years refuge in patriotism has been the first resort of scoundrels of all sorts.”  Professor Cecilia O’Leary of American University saw the articulation of American patriotism as right-wing, militaristic, male, white, Anglo, and repressive.  Professor Betty Jean Craige of the University of Georgia also attacked patriotism because of its association with military prowess.  Professor Peter Spiro of Hofstra University approvingly concluded that it is “increasingly difficult to use the word “we” in the context of international affairs.”   In the past people used the word “we” with reference to the nation-state, but now affiliation with the nation-state “no longer necessarily defines the interest or even allegiance of the individual at the international level.”

Transnationalists view our notions of citizenship and national sovereignty as antiquated and puerile.  They have as much regard for Americans as the 20 million illegals who have invaded our country.

Source: http://universalfreepress.com/is-john-mccain-posing-for-pictures-with-his-boss/

http://www.amazon.com/Who-Are-We-Challenges-Americas/dp/0684870541

The American Nations Today

The Washington Post published an interesting take on the socio-political divide in the United States.  I for one can attest to the migratory patterns of some Americans.  I left a blue state a long time ago, simply because I recognized that economic opportunities were persistently retarded by a progressive mindset of the populace.  I had to leave.

 I have recently begun to notice another migratory pattern.  I’m seeing license plates from northeastern states.  That in itself is alarming.  More disturbing is their bumper stickers.   My neighbor recently moved from Massachusetts.  He has a vote for Elizabeth Warren bumper sticker.   I fear this idiot has moved here permanently.  Since, he is obviously a libtard, I doubt he has pondered the reasons why he relocated to North Carolina.

Sooner or later red states are going to have to set up their own migration policies.

 Source:   http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2013/11/08/which-of-the-11-american-nations-do-you-live-in/   

H/T:  NC Renegade

Obama Forces a Two-Tier System in America

It should be clear to everyone by now, that we live in a post-constitutional America.  Obamacare has created a two-tier system where congressmen, select companies and individuals get exemptions and the rest of us get screwed.  Whatever happed to equal protection under the law?  Where is the 14^th Amendment for the average Joe?

Now two states, Arizona and Kansas, are setting up a two-tiered voting system, one for federal elections and the other for state and local.  All because Obama’s Justice Department believes citizenship should not be the only qualifying factor at the polls.  And what law are they using as a cudgel?  That’s right, the Voting Rights Act of 1965.  I didn’t know illegal aliens were given rights under this law.  Did you?

Democrats dismiss illegal aliens are voting.  But they are.  Here is an excerpt from Mark Levin’s The Liberty Amendments:

Noncitizens are on voter registration lists throughout the country.  In 2005, the Government Accountability Office found that up to 3 percent of the thirty thousand individuals called for jury duty from voter registration rolls, during a two-year period in just one United States district court, were not citizens.  This particular district was in Florida, but Florida is not distinctive.

Colorado’s secretary of state, Scott Gessler, is among a handful of state officials who have aggressively sought to enforce the HAVA.  “Colorado’s secretary of state testified before Congress in 2011 that a check of voter registration rolls against state [Division of Motor Vehicles] records indicated that more than 11,000 Colorado registered voters may not be U.S. citizens – and more than 5,000 of them voted.

 But hey, don’t pay attention to the illegal alien behind the curtain.

  

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/12/us/2-states-plan-2-tier-system-for-balloting.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1

http://www.amazon.com/The-Liberty-Amendments-Restoring-American/dp/1451606273

Democrats: Welcome Illegals! Go Screw Yourselves American Citizens!

What is the value of an American citizenship these days?  If you live in California, it’s not worth much.  That state passed a law allowing illegal aliens a driver’s license and has made it permissible for them to practice law.  Isn’t that special?

We’ve all heard the saying:  So goes California, so goes the rest of the country. 

In Washington D.C. the Obama administration barricaded open air monuments on the national mall.  They are denying World War II vets the ability to visit their memorial.  People who own homes and/or businesses on or near federal land are being forced out and shutdown.  Visitors to natural sites like the Grand Canyon are being denied access.   Many of us consider these actions petty and vindictive.  But what really is astonishing is the following:   

Immigration advocates will rally Tuesday on the otherwise shuttered National Mall, their permit valid due to an exception granted events where people are exercising their First Amendment rights, a spokesman for the National Park Service said Monday.

“Employees are furloughed,” said spokesman Mike Litterst, “but the First Amendment continues.”

But at least one member of Congress complained. “Obama closed the National Mall to WWII vets. You can visit it tomorrow, but only if you’re in the illegal alien rally,” wrote Rep. Steve Stockman (R., Texas) on his Twitter feed.

He was referencing a group of veterans who had tried to visit the National World War II Memorial on the National Mall during the first day of the partial government shutdown last week. Visitors busted through barriers to get to the memorial, but were allowed in the following day after they claimed a First Amendment right to be there and were greeted by sympathetic lawmakers.

Mr. Litterst, of the park service, said that the rules are the same for the immigration rally as they are for any other group claiming to be exercising their First Amendment rights at national parks or memorials.

For instance, he said, anybody claiming this right can just show up at the war memorial and view it from the designated First Amendment area, he said; groups of 26 or more need a permit

So let’s get this straight: First Amendment and access for illegal aliens; go screw yourselves, you stinking American citizens.  Democrats are taking self-loathing to a whole new level.

In the second quarter of 2013, Americans renounced their citizenship sixfold the number in the same period in 2012.  If our federal and state governments don’t value citizenship, then how can they expect the rest of us too?

Source:  http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/10/06/us-usa-immigration-california-idUSBRE99500420131006?feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57605943/california-oks-giving-drivers-licenses-to-illegal-immigrants/

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2013/10/08/immigration-rally-goes-forward-on-mall/

http://investmentwatchblog.com/why-are-americans-giving-up-their-citizenship/

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/10/08/Pro-amnesty-forces-rally-on-National-Mall