Lawless Judge Imposes Lawless DACA on American People

Why am I uncomfortable about Washington D.C. reforming of our immigration laws?  Everything I’ve read so far has demonstrated our so-called representatives are not serious about stopping this third-world invasion.  Congress has the necessary tools to protect our country, but they are too damn feckless and cowardly to implement them. 


If we’re to have real immigration reform, Congress must deal with a branch of government that is largely responsible for legitimizing illegal aliens.  For example, a federal judge just ruled that an unlawful edict by President Obama must be reinstated.  Here is an excerpt from the Washington Times:


A federal judge in New York ruled Tuesday that the government must fully restart the Obama-era DACA deportation amnesty and accept brand new applicants as well as renewals, throwing a potential wrench in the ongoing debate over the fate of “Dreamers” on Capitol Hill.


Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis said the administration does have the power to revoke DACA, but it must give a sound reason for doing so — and the Homeland Security Department’s September 2017 rationale fell far short of what is required in that regard.


He even used Mr. Trump’s own tweets as evidence that the DACA program was ended precipitously, pointing to President Trump's claims that he could “revisit this issue” as proof the program could have been continued.



Judge Garaufis is the second federal judge to rule Mr. Trump’s aides bungled the phaseout — but his decision is the most wide-ranging, ordering the government to not only allow those already in the program to renew their applications but also ordering the government to accept new applications.


This judge just demonstrated that Congress has no legislative role when it comes to immigration and naturalization and that our current president is forbidden to enforce existing laws.  Need we remind these judges that DACA is not a law, but rather an edict promulgated by a megalomaniac with a pen and phone?


If we're to save our nation and the rule of law, Congress has to reactivate Article III which specifically defines the court’s original jurisdiction and that all appellate considerations are to be regulated by Congress; therefore, our elected representatives have the authority to declare federal judges have no jurisdiction when it comes to illegal aliens and immediate deportation is warranted upon arrest.  Foreign nationals who come into this country without authorization are not afforded due process. 


Sceptics will say, the 14th Amendment states otherwise.  No it doesn’t!  Section V specifically states Congress shall enforce the provisions in this article; not a black-robed thug with a messianic complex.


If Congress were circumspect, they would learn from the mistakes of Simpson - Mazzoli.  And one of those mistakes was allowing the federal judiciary to run roughshod over our immigration laws.        




Source:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/feb/13/court-orders-full-restoration-daca-program/

https://costonscomplaint.blogspot.com/2012/06/simpson-mazzoli-act-was-big-lie.html

Sanctuary Cities Should Lose Their Charter and Self-Governance

The United States has a serious problem with illegal aliens and the citizens of this country are suffering the consequences. Just over a week ago, Kate Steinle’s murderer was acquitted by a San Franciscan jury. This is what libtards call justice in a sanctuary city. I don’t know how these people live with themselves.


I believe Americans are getting fed up with this flagrant lawlessness that sanctuary cities, like San Francisco, flout in our faces. I proposed in an earlier post that Congress use the 14th Amendment to disenfranchise congressional districts who give refuge to the so-called “undocumented.” But as we all know our elected representatives are either gutless wonders, or aiding and abetting this third-world invasion.


I have another proposal. It is high time States amend their constitutions as means to rein in lawless city and county governments. North Carolina did this in 1877 right after Reconstruction ended. Here is an excerpt from the North Carolina History Project:


The undemocratic County Government Act of 1877 already hampered elections. By means of this act, Democrats maintained power over local governments. The law allowed the legislature to appoint local justices, and permitted these appointed judges to choose county commissioners. Though other county offices remained elective, the law helped maintain Democratic control of “purse strings” and prevent blacks or Republicans from gaining local power.

The General Assembly’s motives may have been questionable; however this measure was highly effective. State legislatures should also consider revoking charters. Here is an excerpt from the NC League of Municipalities on how this works:


North Carolina municipalities - cities, towns and villages - operate under charters granted by the General Assembly and have powers and authorities granted to them by state statutes and the state constitution. In this state, municipalities do not have home rule, which means that the state legislature must grant the powers and authority to municipalities and authorize them to perform certain functions.


Municipalities are established to protect the citizens and provide residents of a particular area with urban type services: examples are water, sewer, police, streets, transportation, recreation, garbage collection and recycling, land use planning and fire protection. These are all typical but not required municipal services. The individual city or town determines which services it will provide, based on local circumstances. Only a few services are mandated by state or federal law. If a city or town chooses to provide a service however, it must meet whatever state and federal requirements exist for that service.


We need to keep in mind that sanctuary cities have no regard for our immigration laws and Americans are losing their lives because of it. Just recently, an illegal alien in Charlotte was charged for involuntary manslaughter, felonious child abuse and driving without a license.


Lawless cities attract lawless people. It’s time to do something about it.


Source:


http://northcarolinahistory.org/encyclopedia/fusion-politics/


http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article188091709.html


https://www.nclm.org/resource-center/Pages/How-Municipalities-Work.aspx


https://info.legalsolutions.thomsonreuters.com/pdf/perspec/2001-spring/spring-2001-10.pdf


https://www.ncpedia.org/government/convention-1875

Ex-Sen. Russ Feingold is a Bitter, Lawless Man

Russ Feingold, an ex-senator from Wisconsin, is a bitter man. He lost an election that should be embarrassing to anyone with his kind of name recognition. Have you noticed any time a democrat loses an election, they always blame the voters.  Why would the country shun the “party of the people”?  They must be white supremacists.  Yeah, that has to be it.

Americans are not a racist people despite what the Russ Feingolds say about us.  We don’t divide people into subsets with labels like Democrats do.  We respect the rule of law, equality under the law and the value of citizenship.  Democrats have demonstrated time after time that they do not.  Here is an excerpt from Russ Feingold’s op-ed in the Guardian:

The lesson from Charlottesville is not how dangerous the neo-Nazis are. It is the unmasking of the Republican party leadership. In the wake of last weekend’s horror and tragedy, let us finally, finally rip off the veneer that Trump’s affinity for white supremacy is distinct from the Republican agenda of voter suppression, renewed mass incarceration and the expulsion of immigrants.

There is a direct link between Trump’s comments this week and those policies, so where is the outrage about the latter? Where are the Republican leaders denouncing voter suppression as racist, un-American and dangerous? Where are the Republican leaders who are willing to call out the wink (and the direct endorsement) from President Trump to the white supremacists and acknowledge their own party’s record and stance on issues important to people of color as the real problem for our country?

Since when is verifying the legitimacy of a voter un-American?  This should be common sense.  We have a serious problem with the integrity of our voter rolls.  National Review published an article that is quite disturbing.  Here is an excerpt:

The Election Integrity Project of Judicial Watch — a Washington-based legal-watchdog group — analyzed data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2011–2015 American Community Survey and last month’s statistics from the federal Election Assistance Commission. The latter included figures provided by 38 states. According to Judicial Watch, eleven states gave the EAC insufficient or questionable information. Pennsylvania’s legitimate numbers place it just below the over-registration threshold.

My tabulation of Judicial Watch’s state-by-state results yielded 462 counties where the registration rate exceeded 100 percent. There were 3,551,760 more people registered to vote than adult U.S. citizens who inhabit these counties.

“That’s enough over-registered voters to populate a ghost-state about the size of Connecticut,” Judicial Watch attorney Robert Popper told me.

Asking a voter to provide an ID is not suppression.  What an absurd statement. Feingold’s assertion that we have mass expulsion of immigrants is grossly misleading.  Illegal aliens do not have a right to be in this country.  They are not supposed to be here. We have laws against that.

The reasons why Democrats lose elections have nothing to do with race. If anything, they’re losing elections because they are a lawless party.  

Source:

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/450413/election-fraud-registered-voters-outnumber-eligible-voters-462-counties

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/19/republican-party-white-supremacists-charlottesville

https://ballotpedia.org/Russ_Feingold

Gov. "Snowflake" Roy Cooper Defies Confirmation Hearings

Democrats just love thumbing their noses at our laws.  They spit on them and then dare us to do something about it.  Barack Obama’s presidency was a parade of lawlessness.  North Carolina is enduring the same kind of attitude from Governor “Snowflake” Roy Cooper.

North Carolina passed a law that requires confirmation hearings on all cabinet nominees.  But our little snowflake governor believes his administration is special and refuses to participate in these plebeian proceedings.

RALEIGH, N.C. — Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Wesley Meredith threatened "consequences" after Military and Veterans Affairs Secretary Larry Hall's chair sat empty for a second cabinet confirmation hearing on Wednesday.

"By disrespecting this process, Secretary Hall is defying the law," Meredith, R-Cumberland, said in the latest public tableau to play out in the months-long power struggle between Republican lawmakers and Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper.

Meredith said that Hall, and by extension Cooper, would have one more chance Thursday to comply with a newly implemented confirmation process.

"There are consequences when state officials refuse to follow the law," he said before quickly gaveling the committee meeting to a close

So far, eight appointees have taken their post without hearings and are receiving salaries from the public treasury.  Republicans dominate the General Assembly, it’s about time they exercised their power by denying these rogue administrators a paycheck and if Cooper continues to thumb his nose at our laws, he must face the prospect of being impeached.

Source:

http://www.wral.com/senators-threaten-consequences-if-nc-cabinet-nominees-continue-to-abjure-confirmation-process/16544701/

Barack Obama's Presidential First

 Doug Ross Journal listed a lengthy presidential first for Barack Obama. Here are a few examples:

• First President to Use the IRS to "Unfairly Target Political Enemies" as Well as pro-Catholic and pro-Jewish Groups (Source: Sen. Ted Cruz)

• First President to Unlawfully Seize Telephone Records of More than 100 Reporters to Intimidate and/or Bully Them (Source: Associated Press)

• First President to Witness a Single Cabinet Secretary Commit Multiple Hatch Act Violations Without Acting, Speaking Out, Disciplining or Firing That Person (Source: New York Times)

• First President to Systematically Release Detained Illegal Aliens Charged With Homicide Into the U.S. Population (Source: USA Today)

• First President to Release 40,000 Illegal Aliens with Serious and/or Violent Criminal Records Inside the U.S. (Source: Judicial Watch)

• First President to Create Secret Police Units Inside Government Agencies to Block Lawful Investigations by Inspectors General (Source: Associated Press)

Click the link above to read the rest.

Carly Fiorina Enables Federal Government Lawlessness

I’m having serious reservations about Carly Fiorina’s candidacy for the republican nomination.  At first, I thought, she was an ideal candidate for taking on the central government.  She’s intelligent, articulate, prepared, and more importantly, she’s not a D.C. insider.  But she has strayed from the issues that are important to Americans.

Her stance on birthright citizenship is particularly annoying.

 Carly Fiorina said that changing the Constitution to remove birthright citizenship would not be an efficient way to address immigration reform. There are more important matters to discuss, she added.

 “It would take passing a constitutional amendment to get that changed. It’s part of our 14th Amendment. So honestly, I think we should put all of our energies, all of our political will into finally getting the border secured and fixing the legal immigration,” she said.

 Fiorina also said the U.S. should defund sanctuary cities and deport undocumented immigrants who commit crimes.

I have news for Carly Fiorina.  Bastardization of the 14^th Amendment is an important matter.  Anchor babies and forcing States to educate illegal alien children legitimizes this third world invasion from Latin America.  It undermines our sovereignty and the rule of law. 

A president with fortitude and force of personality can persuade Americans on the forthrightness of his or her actions by pointing out the abuses of the federal judiciary and particularly the Supreme Court.  If need be, a president must organize an Article V States convention to rid us of this meddlesome vehicle for activist judges.

Ms. Fiorina likes to talk about the rule of law, but what about judicial activism.  Will she abide by unlawful rulings by rogue judges who believe their legislators and not jurist?  Here is her response to the arrest of a Kentucky clerk who has the audacity to be a Christian.

In a radio interview on Tuesday, Ms. Fiorina, who has been forceful about the rule of law, said, “Is she prepared to continue to work for the government, be paid for by the government, in which case she needs to execute the government’s will, or does she feel so strongly about this that she wants to sever her employment with the government and go seek employment elsewhere where her religious liberties would be paramount over her duties as a government employee?”

Does Ms. Fiorina understand the basic principles of federalism?  Kathy Davis is not a federal government employee.  She was elected by her constituents in a county in Kentucky.  Worse, Ms. Fiorina doesn’t believe Christians should practice their faith in public life.  This is a dangerous sentiment and concedes to the lawlessness of the Supreme Court and their band of black robed thugs throughout the federal judiciary.

Ms. Fiorina likes to talk about the rule of law.  Maybe she would be more convincing if she addressed the lawlessness of the federal government.

 Source:

https://www.yahoo.com/politics/birthright-citizenship-where-the-2016-127093585661.html

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/09/03/candidates-support-kim-davis-with-varying-intensity/

Hey Obama, Stop Hating on the Constitution

We are in a constitutional crisis all because of this narcissist.


Obama Chides House GOP for Pursuing Lawsuit: Speaking at a rally in Kansas City, Missouri, President Barack Obama said, "Stop hating all the time," and called the lawsuit accusing him of exceeding his powers in enforcing his health care law a "political stunt." (July 30)


I've got a better idea.  Hey Obama, stop hating the U.S. Constitution.

Time to Impeachment Americas Terrorist: U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder

Republican members of Congress are becoming exasperated with the outright lawlessness in Washington D.C.  Government bureaucrats have a green light to violate our civil rights, and no one can do a damn thing about it.  This is what happens when we have an imperial president.

One congressman is demanding impeachment proceedings for U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder.  TPNN reported the exasperation of one congressman:

“Because if we don’t have the civil application of the law, what are we doing here?” Gosar asked rhetorically, referring to Holder’s laundry list of lawless acts. 

Congressman Gosar is one of 27 congressmen who have already signed Articles of Impeachment against Holder. 

“I give you, an unelected bureaucrat who is violating the Constitution, and that is Eric Holder,” Gosar told Tim while stating that both parties are guilty of building a government bureaucracy that “answers to no one.” 

Gosar said that impeaching is not the end game, but that Congress must also take responsibility for holding accountable bureaucrats, like the Obama IRS’s Lois Lerner, who are “violating the Constitution and getting away with it.”

At least republicans are awakening to this bureaucratic monstrosity they helped to create.  Now what are we going to do about it?

Source:  http://www.tpnn.com/2014/06/18/exclusive-congressman-lays-out-strategy-to-impeach-eric-holder/

Photo H/T:  NC Renegade

Constitutional Atty Frets Over Presidential Power Grab

The aforementioned attorney believes the federal courts are the solution to curb Obama's lawlessness.  I disagree.  The courts are part of the problem and have been for almost a century.  Hadn't it been for Chief Justice Roberts rewriting the law, we wouldn't be in this Obamacare mess.

Executive Lawlessness: Obama's Weapons of Political Intimidation

Executive Lawlessness: Obama Skirts Constitution

Senator Ted Cruz Op-Ed Shames Lawless President

Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) wrote an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal describing the lawless nature of the Obama administration.  Here are a couple of excerpts:

Of all the troubling aspects of the Obama presidency, none is more dangerous than the president's persistent pattern of lawlessness, his willingness to disregard the written law and instead enforce his own policies via executive fiat. On Monday, Mr. Obama acted unilaterally to raise the minimum wage paid by federal contracts, the first of many executive actions the White House promised would be a theme of his State of the Union address Tuesday night.

 The president's taste for unilateral action to circumvent Congress should concern every citizen, regardless of party or ideology. The great 18th-century political philosopher Montesquieu observed: "There can be no liberty where the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or body of magistrates." America's Founding Fathers took this warning to heart, and we should too

Rule of law doesn't simply mean that society has laws; dictatorships are often characterized by an abundance of laws. Rather, rule of law means that we are a nation ruled by laws, not men. That no one—and especially not the president—is above the law. For that reason, the U.S. Constitution imposes on every president the express duty to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed."

 Yet rather than honor this duty, President Obama has openly defied it by repeatedly suspending, delaying and waiving portions of the laws he is charged to enforce. When Mr. Obama disagreed with federal immigration laws, he instructed the Justice Department to cease enforcing the laws. He did the same thing with federal welfare law, drug laws and the federal Defense of Marriage Act.

Senator Cruz makes the case that Obamacare is one illegal enterprise:

The law says that businesses with 50 or more full-time employees will face the employer mandate on Jan. 1, 2014. President Obama changed that, granting a one-year waiver to employers. How did he do so? Not by going to Congress to change the text of the law, but through a blog post by an assistant secretary at Treasury announcing the change.

 The law says that only Americans who have access to state-run exchanges will be subject to employer penalties and may obtain ObamaCare premium subsidies. This was done to entice the states to create exchanges. But, when 34 states decided not to establish state-run exchanges, the Obama administration announced that the statutory words "established by State" would also mean "established by the federal government."

 The law says that businesses with 50 or more full-time employees will face the employer mandate on Jan. 1, 2014. President Obama changed that, granting a one-year waiver to employers. How did he do so? Not by going to Congress to change the text of the law, but through a blog post by an assistant secretary at Treasury announcing the change.

The law says that only Americans who have access to state-run exchanges will be subject to employer penalties and may obtain ObamaCare premium subsidies. This was done to entice the states to create exchanges. But, when 34 states decided not to establish state-run exchanges, the Obama administration announced that the statutory words "established by State" would also mean "established by the federal government."

 It’s about time someone in Congress shamed this administration.  Even then, I doubt it would put a stop to this president.

Source:

 http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304632204579338793559838308?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop