Hillary Clinton published a book in 1996 entitled, “It
Takes a Village.” Indeed, it takes a
village to destroy a country and you don’t have to look any further than
Washington D.C. That wasn’t her premise,
but I’ll sure as hell make it.
When Congress established Washington D.C. as the
permanent seat of the federal government by passing the Residence Act in 1790, it
was mandated that this village would not exceed 10 miles square. Today, that hellhole town has spread its
tentacles throughout Virginia and Maryland.
Those two states have been corrupted by federal bureaucrats, lobbyists,
politicians, criminals and legions of teat squawkers who have settled there and
are subjecting citizens to a host of absurdities that only Democrats could
conjure.
Case in point is Terry McAuliffe, a Clinton toady. That man wouldn’t have been elected governor hadn’t it been for the D.C. suburbs. And he rules like an arrogant insider. McAuliffe decided to be a mini-Obama by invoking an executive order that would restore voting rights to 206,000 ex-felons without the consent of Virginia’s General Assembly. And why should he? He has a pen and a phone. This whole representative republic thing is for suckers and Christians, not for enlightened progressives.
As a matter of fact, the more power Washington D.C.
confers upon itself, the more endangered our republic and liberties become. That village has become antagonistic towards
American citizens, the rule of law, our sovereignty and the Constitution of the United States. This threat doesn’t just come from the
president, Congress and government bureaucrats, but from the federal judiciary
itself. This branch of government was
considered the most dangerous of all by the Anti-Federalist. Here is what the pseudonymous writer Brutus
prophetically wrote:
The judicial power will operate to effect, in the
most certain, but yet silent and imperceptible manner, what is evidently the
tendency of the constitution: — I mean, an entire subversion of the
legislative, executive and judicial powers of the individual states. Every
adjudication of the supreme court, on any question that may arise upon the
nature and extent of the general government, will affect the limits of the
state jurisdiction. In proportion as the former enlarge the exercise of their
powers, will that of the latter be restricted.
That the judicial power of the United States, will lean strongly in favour of the general government, and will give such an explanation to the constitution, as will favour an extension of its jurisdiction, is very evident from a variety of considerations.
That the judicial power of the United States, will lean strongly in favour of the general government, and will give such an explanation to the constitution, as will favour an extension of its jurisdiction, is very evident from a variety of considerations.
We are truly going the way of the Roman Empire. Don’t believe me? Watch the video below and compare.
Source:
No comments:
Post a Comment