Sunday, July 28, 2019

President Trump Calls Out Slumlord Elijah Cummings

President Trump is the antithesis of political correctness. He is direct, to the point and damn your feelings. This is a problem for snowflakes and politicians who’ve been coddled for decades. People who use this pc nonsense to shame their opponents are at their wits end. They simply don’t know what to do about a man named Trump.

I love it. I love watching our president get in their face and tear down their facade. Nothing gives me more pleasure than an astonished snowflake wallowing in a puddle of tears, especially when it’s factually based like this third-world hellhole called Baltimore. Democrats, like Elijah Cummings, have been throwing mud at conservatives for as long as I can remember, without retribution. Well, he got his the other day, and the snowflakes have been howling ever since. Here is President Trump’s missive to slumlord Elijah Cummings:

I’ve been to Baltimore and that is the truth. I was there in 2004 for the Preakness and to do a little sightseeing, and believe me, I saw more than I wanted. HBO had a show around that time called, The Wire that was filmed in Baltimore. Well, I ran into Elijah Cummings district and it was exactly like the television show. I swear, it was block after block of boarded up houses as far as the eye could see. Homelessness and poverty everywhere. I can only thank God, I didn’t happen upon this area at night. I don’t know if I would’ve lived through it.

Needless to say, I didn’t venture far from the tourist areas after that. If you want an American version of a third-world hellhole, all you have to do is visit Rep Elijah Cummings’ district. Be sure to hire a guide and bring a camera.


Sunday, July 21, 2019

Emma Goldman: An Enlightened Fool

I find it laughable that a refugee from a Muslim country has the audacity to lecture American citizens on what it means to be an American. This same woman, Ilhan Omar, proclaims to love our country so much, that she wants to fundamentally change it. Apparently, we’re so flawed, that we’re incapable of fulfilling our promises. One can only guess what that maybe. Afterall, who knows more about the American creed than a Muslim refugee from an Islamic state.

America has a history of foreign radicals coming to our shores with the intention of fundamentally changing it. The Progressive Era is replete with anarchists and communist revolutionaries murdering, bombing and causing mayhem. Some gained notoriety if not outright infamy. Emma Goldman was one of them.

Emma Goldman was a Russian emigrant. It only took her a couple of years to seek out and hook up with anarchists in New York City. There she built a career denouncing the United States and agitating for social justice. Does that sound familiar?

She and her boyfriend, Alexander Berkman - another Russian emigrant and fellow anarchist - plotted to assassinate Henry Clay Frick of Carnegie Steel. He failed and ended up in prison for about 14 years, while she remained free to agitate. After he was freed, they continued to propagate their anti-American screed through publications and a prolific lecture circuit.

But something happened on the way to utopia. The United States entered WWI and shortly thereafter, the Bolshevik Revolution happened in Russia. Guess who were fans of the Bolsheviks? That’s right, Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman. But they weren’t alone. There were thousands of other immigrants who subscribed to this foreign ideology.

President Wilson realized something had to be done about the enemy from within. Beginning in 1919, Federal, state and local agents began to round up foreign radicals then sent them to the Bureau of Immigration for deportation. Amongst them, were Emma Goldman, Alexander Berkman and a coterie of their fellow buddies. They were sent to Finland with an armed escort to that dreamed of paradise known as Bolshevik Russia.

Now, you’d think that would be a happy ending for these “American” revolutionaries, but you’d be wrong. Come to find out, socialist/communist don’t believe in free speech. Moreover, they don’t tolerate anarchists. Lenin massacred thousands of them. Wow. I guess the United States doesn’t look so bad afterall. Hindsight is 20/20. That’s too bad for our anarchist duo.

I watched a documentary about Emma Goldman. Towards the end, I noticed a common refrain: Emma Goldman was an enlightened fool. Correspondence between these two anarchists affirm this acknowledgment. Berkman later committed suicide.

President Trump maybe onto something when he hinted that Ilhan Omar should go back to her native country and fix it. Maybe then, she’ll begin to understand what a fool she is for denigrating her adopted country.


Saturday, July 20, 2019

The Four Whores of the American Apocalypse

And there I saw, riding a wild beast, four harlots heaping hatred and condemnation upon a great nation. These third-world whores spewed diseases of dissent and self-loathing. And the progressive horde wallowed and filled their bellies with contempt for everything American, as darkness fell over them and the hope of all mankind.

Only in America could Muslim refugees, a migrant from a protectorate country, and a descendent of a freed people use our birthright against us.

These four women: AOC, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaid, and Aryanna Pressley have fashioned themselves, the Squad. I believe a more appropriate term should be “Suicide Squad.”

It’s bad enough we have so-called American citizens who want to fundamentally transform our country into a Marxist hellhole, do we really need an unfettered immigration system importing people who refuse to acculturate? We fancy ourselves a melting pot. But what happens when certain ingredients contaminate the stew? Do we continue to ingest this poison, or do we purge ourselves?

The simple fact is, we are victims of our own success. Emigrates come to our country for opportunities afforded them without appreciation. They have an entitlement mentality that is something to behold. They even require us to pay homage to a foreign “religion” that is antithetical, if not outright hostile, to Western civilization. And if we don’t, we’re labeled as racist, bigot xenophobes.

The Whore of Babylon was introduced in Revelations as a portent for the end of times. We could probably say the same of the Four Whores of the American apocalypse. They’re an omen for what’s coming to the United States.

Escalating Hysteria and Absurdity at Mt. Progressive

I thought when Donald J. Trump was elected president, we would begin to decline this summit of stupidity; but apparently, there is no designated elevation for Mt. Progressive. The skies the limit when it comes to their hysteria and absurdity.

President Trump cannot sneeze without raising the ire of the PC police and their representatives in Congress. Did he use a white hanky? He’s a racist! Did he snot on a rag? He’s a misogynist! Did he throw that tissue in a trash can? He’s a xenophobe!

So, it shouldn’t be a surprise when the president is denounced for voicing what many of us think, or when he gets blamed for a chant from a crowd at a rally. His detractors are willing to create controversy, or manufacture a crisis where there is none in the hopes of dinging his approval numbers. Hey, it worked on Bush, it’ll work on Trump.

So here we are, once again, having to endure another tyrant trope from the “mainstream media” simply because President Trump enunciated a time-worn truism, America: Love it or Leave it.

The following day, you would’ve thought that the commander-in-chief had effectuated a policy equivalent to the Alien and Sedition Act of 1798. His criticism of the Four Whores of Anti-Semitism where construed as an attack on the First Amendment. Fears of actual concentration camps danced in their heads, with visions of toilet water splashing their chin. Their hysteria was absolutely laughable.

The simple fact is Trump can’t do squat. Where have these people been for the past three years? He can’t enforce existing laws or policies without injunctions from an Obama judge. Congress is constantly threatening him with impeachment, and the “media” have been in constant panic mode since he won the primary in 2016. And they think Tyrant Trump is going to roundup dissenters and send them back to the hellholes from whence they came?

All I have to say is take a deep breath, strap on an oxygen tank, because we’ve got a long way to go before we reach the summit of Mt. Progressive.

Saturday, July 13, 2019

The Sound of Snowflakes

By T.L. Coston

Hello Snowflake - freedoms nemesis
I hear you whining once again
About perceived injustices
The rising cost of tuition
And the vicissitudes of life

Phantoms of guilt have arrested your head
Punctured by a crown of affluence
Past Generations mock your abilities
While you sit back weeping
Sitting in your safe-space wondering
About the sounds of dissent

Statues mock what you represent
White bread life is not America
How dare we glorify our founding
When others were bound in slavery
Forget those who died believing
Forget those who fulfilled a promise of liberty
Because history is what progressives teach
The sound of dissent

The world is your responsibility
We must put a stop to fingering 
The thermostat of climate change
Because God has been replaced
And all that remains is 

The sound of Snowflakes

The Next Civil War will be Regional in Nature

I tend to agree with this guy's analysis.  If a civil war breaks out in the United States, it will be regional and spontaneous in nature.  This will be an urban vs. rural conflict within each state.  Once this conflagration happens, it will spread throughout the country.  

If an insurrection where to happen, Congress has the authority under Article One, Section Eight to call forth the "militia."  That will be interesting.  We already have neighbor taking up arms against neighbor.  I wonder how that's going to work out. 

Let's not forget the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 prohibits the use of the military within our borders.  Can we expect fidelity of the law from the president of the United States?  If a liberal is in office the answer is a resounding, no! 

Speaker Pelosi Proclaims She is an Anti-American Globalist

Democrats should get their asses spanked in the coming general election. This party has proclaimed itself subversive and outright hostile to the rule of law and the American creed.

If you’re a citizen, you should be outraged that Nancy Pelosi and her Marxist horde have practically declared war on American sovereignty. Her press conference was an outright admission that they’re globalist, and they have no regard for any of us.

In order for Americans to reclaim any self-respect, we must relegate the Democratic party to permanent minority status. This smackdown is imperative, to do otherwise is to relegate America into the dustbin of history.


Democrats Commit Coup by using Illegal Aliens in U.S. Census

Democrats have weaponized the U.S. Census and the apportionment act to empower themselves and their new constituents: illegal alien invaders. They’ve determined citizenship and U.S. jurisdiction is no longer adequate in allocating congressional districts; residency is the only requirement.

This is partisan politics on a grand scale. These actions have resulted in disenfranchisement of citizens and the empowerment of foreigners. This is a coup. Make no mistake about it, this is a hostile takeover. If you have any doubts, all you have to do is watch the first two Democratic party debates. Did you see much concern for American citizens? All I saw was a band of revolutionaries catering to the needs of invaders. If anyone objects, they’ll be called a racist.

What can we do? President Trump tried to inject citizenship into the census, but that was too odious. It’s okay for government bureaucrats to know how many toilets you have in your house, but god-forbid we know who’s a citizen. That’s just one big brother question too many!

Is there anyway the president can delay the Census? According to the Enumerations Clause an account shall be made every ten years in such a manner as the law directs. Does the law forbid questioning who’s a citizen? Who’s responsible for taking it off in the first place?

Back in the 1920’s, Congress delayed allocation of congressional districts. There was a major population shift from rural to urban areas. As it was then, as it is today, there is a big difference in values between these two constituencies. So allocation can be delayed until we have a new census that determines who is a citizen and who isn’t.

I would, once again, refer to the Enumeration Clause in Article One, Section Two:

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.

This directive explicitly denotes allocation shall be determined by the number of persons who are under the jurisdiction of the United States. Illegal aliens are not recognized and therefore are ineligible for allocation purposes. You have to be here legally in order to be considered a constituent.

I do hope someone will take up this gauntlet and smack a few of these Democratic party revolutionaires. But then again, you’d just be called a racist.


Wednesday, July 10, 2019

Rush Limbaugh: Globalist Elites to Erase Concept of Citizenship

A couple of weeks ago, I read an article about American citizens residing in Mexico and the possible tax problems they may encounter with the IRS. The take-away paragraph, in essence, stated Mexico employs a residency tax, whereas, the United States taxes citizens. To my chagrin, I saved this article and now I can’t find it, because this would’ve tied in perfectly with what I heard on the Rush Limbaugh Show.

We’ve all come to the conclusion that elite snobs throughout the country have nothing but contempt for American citizens. This attitude has become overt in institutions like the Democratic party and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. They make no bones about it. The only way to rule America is to diminish citizenship by relegating us to mere residents. Here is an excerpt from today’s show:

But what the objective is, over time — and do not doubt me on this — the objective is to erase concept of citizenship altogether and replace it with simple residency so you become an American simply because you’re here, however you got here, you’re an American, entitling you to everything, all of the benefits, quote, unquote, that Americans are entitled to.

And if you live in the Netherlands, then you’re not a citizen there. You are a resident, and you live in the Netherlands. And so the globalists — Amy, you’re right — they want to erase, obliterate all of the cultural norms that have been used to identify and distinguish for legitimate purposes people all over the world. They want to obliterate all of those. And the reason is to take away any unique identity from everybody.

If you take away everybody’s unique identity and deny them the opportunity to be who they are, such as deny them the opportunity to be a legitimate American, then you have that much of an easier job to control everybody, which, make no mistake, is what the globalist objective is all about. It’s total control and power over people to get the desired outcome you want for yourself, and to hell with the people whose outcomes you are deciding.

They are mere fodder. The population at large, en masse, is merely a mechanism to achieve what you want. This is a total move by elites to further distance themselves from people they think average, ordinary, common, and beneath them. And it’s a worldwide movement that is headed up by aristocratic elites in European and American capitals. And it’s been underway for a while. These are the people threatened when they hear Donald Trump talking about making America great again. Amy, thanks again for the call. Appreciate it.

Now that is excellence in broadcasting.


Saturday, July 6, 2019

Slavery and the Four Liberties in Early America

As a student of history, I cannot help but wonder how early Americans could reconcile liberty with the institution of slavery. Obviously, that round peg doesn’t fit in a square hole. Many of our founders - not to mention, framers of our Constitution - owned slaves. These same people frequently railed against a distant parliament and king who denied them their rights as Englishmen, relegating them to a state of enslavement. Our revolution is based upon this very premise. So what gives?

Well, first, we must understand the first waves of British migration to the new world and their definition of liberty. Each had their own milieu that was as distinctive as the section of England from whence they came. This prejudices - religious and cultural - cultivated themselves in the section of America each wave colonized. These seeds germinated, nearly a century later, into the bloodiest war in our history.

Albion’s Seed by David Hackett Fischer is probably the best book I’ve read on the various definitions of liberty and the cultures that embraced them. Here is an excerpt:

Exodus: The Four Great Migration, 1629-1750

After 1629 the major folk movements began to occur, in the series of waves that are the subject of this book. As we have seen, the first wave (1629-40) was an exodus of English Puritanswho came mainly from the eastern counties and planted in Massachusetts a very special culture with unique patterns of speech and architecture, distinctive ideas about marriage and the family nucleated settlements, congregational churches, town meetings, and a tradition of ordered liberty.

The second wave brought to Virginia a different set o English folkways, mainly from a broad belt of territory that extended from Kent and Devon north to Northhamptonshire and Warwickshire. This culture was characterized by scattered settlements, extreme hierarchies of rank, strong oligarchies, Anglican churches, a highly developed sense of honor and an idea of hegemonic liberty.

The third wave (ca. 1675-1715) was the Friends’ migration, which carried yet another culture from England's North Midlands to the Delaware Valley. It was founded on a Christian idea of spiritual equality, a work ethic of unusual intensity, a suspicion of social hierarchy, and an austerity which Max Weber called “world asceticism.” It also preserved many elements of North Midland speech, architecture, dress and food ways. Most important, it deliberately created a pluralistic system if reciprocal liberty in the Delaware Valley.

The fourth great migration (1717-75) came to the backcountry from the borderlands of North Britain- an area which included Scottish lowlands, the north of Ireland and England’s six northern counties. These emigrants were of different ethnic stocks, but shared a common border culture which was unique in its speech, architecture, family ways and child-bearing customs. Its material culture was marked by extreme inequalities of condition, and its public life was dominated by a distinctive ideal of natural liberty.

So, Mr. Fischer has distinguished four forms of liberty: ordered, hegemonic, reciprocal and natural. Two of these would come into serious conflict in the mid-1800’s. The same factions that were responsible for the English Civil War later became antagonists in the American Civil War: the roundheads and cavaliers. We have ordered liberty at war with hegemonic liberty.

For the purposes of understanding how slavery could coexist with liberty, one must look at the hegemonic version. Here is another excerpt from Albion’s Seed:

It never occured to most Virginia gentlemen that liberty belonged to everyone. It was thought to be the special birthright of free-born Englishmen - a property which set this “happy breed” apart from other mortals, and gave them a right to rule less fortunate people in the world. Even within their own society, hegemonic liberty was a hierarchical idea. One’s status in Virginia was defined by the liberties that one possessed. Men of high estate were thought to have more liberties than others of lesser rank. Servants possessed few liberties, and slaves none at all. This libertarian idea had nothing to do with equality. Many years later, John Randolph of Roanoke summarized his ancestral creed in a sentence: “I am an aristocrat,” he declared, “I love liberty; I hate equality.”

So now we know how slavery can exist in time when men preached and valued liberty against a distant parliament and king without feeling of hypocracy or guilt. We should also understand that slavery in the Americas was a British institution. Pennsylvania tried to outlaw the importation and practice of slavery but was rebuked by the Crown. Here is another excerpt from Albion’s Seed:

The Pennsylvania legislature took action in 1712, passing a prohibitive duty on the importation of slaves. This measure was disallowed by the English Crown, which had a heavy stake in the slave trade. In 1730 the Philadelphia yearly meeting cautioned its members, but still a few Friends continued to buy slaves. Other Quaker antislavery petitions and papers followed in increasing number. A close student of this material finds that Quaker “anti-slavery reformers never contended that slavery was economically unsound.” They insisted that is was morally corrupt, and at war with the deepest values of Christianity. The argument came down to the reciprocal principle of the golden rule. Quakers argued that if they did not wish to be slaves themselves, they had no right to enslave others.

Liberals love to hold slavery as an albatross around America’s neck. Maybe they wouldn’t hate our country if they picked up a book and tried to understand our past; it’s not that difficult.


Educators Teach Doctrine of Interdependence Instead of American Independence

When I was a kid, I don’t recall the vitriol and outright hatred of our country as we do today. I’m old enough to remember the bicentennial where even rock stars celebrated an exceptionable moment in world history. Our independence is worthy of being lauded, not condemned.

What could’ve caused this 180 in a span of just 40 years? I don’t think we have to look any further than our educational system and the Progressives who’ve taken it over. These people have plotted to brainwash American children for well over a century; instead of teaching about independence and self-government, educators are emphasizing a doctrine of interdependence. Here is an excerpt from the Tennessee Star:

How did we get from the Declaration of Independence to the State of Political Correctness?

In 1918, Mary Parker Follett wrote, in The New State, group organization would subsume popular government, “The training for the new democracy must be from the cradle – through nursery, school and play, and on and on through every activity of our life. Citizenship is not to be learned in good government classes or current events courses or lessons in civics. It is to be acquired through those modes of living and acting which shall teach us how to grow the social consciousness. This should be the object of all day school education, of all night school education, of all our supervised recreation, of all our family life, of our club life, of our civic life.

“When we change our ideas of the relation of the individual to society, our whole system of education changes. What we want to teach is interdependence, that efficiency waits on discipline, that discipline is obedience to the whole of which I am a part… when we know how to teach social discipline, then we shall know how to ‘teach school.’ The object of education is to fit children into the life of the community.” P.363

In Marquardt’s analysis, the goal Follett set for our education system was the complete reformation of the American mind; our lives must focus completely on losing our individual rights in subordination to the group.

Little wonder that after a century of education influenced by Mary Parker Follett’s ideas vast numbers of Americans believe our country is the source of most of the world’s ills.

If we don’t take back our schools and universities, this country is doomed. A nation of self-loathing citizens will not survive.


Democratic Patriotism Based on Strongman Politics

Another Fourth of July passes, and once again, we patriots are subjected to a litany of abuse and revisionist crap that historically illiterate chimps gleefully throw. When God created opposable thumbs, I don’t believe he had shit slinging in mind. I can just imagine what a UV light would expose on the keyboards and monitors of some of these editorial boards. What a nightmare.

While we were commemorating our independence, Progressives were screaming from the top of their lungs that America was never great; that we should be ashamed of our founding, and our perceived atrocities. According to these nutjobs, our independence rang the death knell of planet Earth.

You would think with that kind of vitriol, we would experience a mass migration from the United States. If Liberals truly believed their own rhetoric, why do they stay? After all,who would want to live in this evil Death Star?

The fact is, their love for country is not based on our founding principles, but rather, on what party controls Washington D.C. Here is an excerpt from Breitbart News:

Even though Gallup shows a correlation between levels of patriotism and which party controls the White House, the level of pride among Democrats since Trump took office is exponentially low. During the administration of President George W. Bush, the percent of Democrats expressing extreme pride in their country never fell under 46 percent. In comparison, during the presidency of Barack Obama the share of Republicans identifying as extremely proud to be American never dropped below 68 percent.

This is why Democrats are aiding and abetting this third-world invasion. They have an affinity with a culture and people who embrace strongman politics.