Sunday, March 31, 2019

Clapper Sings: Obama Behind Russian Hoax

James Clapper, former Director of Intelligence under the Obama administration, just ratted out the Anointed One.  This whole Russian Spygate scam was orchestrated out of the White House. Here is an excerpt:

ANDERSON COOPER, CNN HOST: The 2017 assessment that the President says he now agrees with, that was done while you and then NCI Director John Brennan were still in office. So, how can we reconcile the President attacking you, but apparently after a very long time finally, allegedly saying — or saying he allegedly agrees with the product of the intelligence community that you, yourself oversaw?

JAMES CLAPPER: Yes, well, this is — yes, as we’ve come to know the President, he is not a stalwart for a consistency or coherence. So it’s very hard to explain that. One point I’d like to make, Anderson, that I don’t think has come up very much before, and I’m alluding now to the President’s criticism of President Obama for all that he did or didn’t do before he left office with respect to the Russian meddling. If it weren’t for President Obama, we might not have done the intelligence community assessment that we did that set off a whole sequence of events which are still unfolding today, notably, special counsel Mueller’s investigation.

President Obama is responsible for that, and it was he who tasked us to do that intelligence community assessment in the first place. I think it’s an important point when it comes to critiquing President Obama.

Critiquing President Obama? This is an indictment! We need a special counsel to investigate this complete abuse of power and violation of American civil rights. People need to go to jail over this crap. And I might add, no need to compose, there is plenty to sing about.


[VIRAL] Best Damn Safe Commercial with Randy the Safe Guy | Viral Safe V...

A commercial designed not to offend the SJW's of the world.

Online Dating Profiles Gone Awry

H/T:  Muskegon Pundit

Democrats Use Illegal Aliens to Weaponize Census

If Americans should learn anything, it’s Democrats usually accuse others of what they’re doing. The Obama administration consistently accused conservatives of bullying their opponents. Well, if I remember correctly, it was the tea party and other organizations that were harassed by federal bureaucracies. Some businesses that expressed discontent with Obama’s policies were investigated. I don't recall Reagan or the Bushes using these tactics.  Do you?

This same administration weaponized our intelligence agencies by spying on candidate Trump. They used a fake dossier compiled by foreign agents to push through FISA warrants. What was the accusation leveled at candidate Trump? Oh, that’s right, he was accused of colluding with Russian agents to fix an election. It looks like the other way around, if you ask me.

Make no mistake about it, Democrats value nothing but power and money, and they’ll do anything to obtain it. The latest battle is the coming decennial census. Senator Kamala Harris made the following charge:

The census is supposed to get a full and accurate count of the U.S. population. By weaponizing the census, this Administration is violating the idea that everyone counts.

Let’s take a look at what the Enumeration Clause states in Article One, Section 2:

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. 

I’ll concede that citizens aren’t exclusively used for census purposes. However, no one can doubt that those counted are people who are authorized to be in the United States. The phrase: including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, meant indentured servants, and the three fifths clause was used to count slaves. We must take note of: excluding Indians not taxed. That means people who aren’t recognized and are subject to the jurisdiction of foreign countries shall not be counted in the census. Illegal aliens fall under this category, therefore, they shouldn’t be counted.

But that’s not going to happen. Blue state Democrats need illegal aliens to be counted. They need seats in the House and Electoral votes for the presidency. They have an insatiable need to control Washington D.C. and the treasury. Remember, it’s not about citizenship or the integrity of the vote; it’s about power and money.


Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: I Need More Money, You American Ingrates!

AOC has become the belle of Washington D.C. This privileged status has endowed her with an entitlement mentality. Apparently, she’s not being paid enough to support her living expenses and staff. It’s not enough that Americans have to endure her ignorance and outright stupidity, but now we have to listen to her whining.

Members of Congress often vote to cut or keep their allowances low.

It’s a superficial gesture, bc keeping Congressional pay low is what creates the desperation + impetus for good, experienced staff to flee to lobbyist jobs.

Raising staffer pay helps get money out of politics.

Same w/ member pay.

Members are paid more than avg - but job reqs 2 residences + we can’t take tax deductions for work costs.

No one wants to be the one to bring up increases, so instead ppl take advantage of insider trading loopholes & don’t close them for the extra cash. 🤷🏽‍♀️

I’ve a better idea, why don’t we limit the amount of time Congress is in session? Hell, they’ve practically abrogated their constitutional responsibilities to unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats and low-level judges. We have district courts dictating policy everyday. What good is Congress? It seems to me, most of their time is spent on vacation anyway. 

Let’s kill two birds with one stone. We’ll implement limited congressional sessions and telecommunication. After that, they have no need for a huge staff and we can reduce their pay. Problem solved! How about it, AOC?


AOC: Republicans Passed Amendment to Term Limit FDR

Wow, this passes for intelligent representation in Congress.  Keep in mind, AOC is a product of our educational system.

Patriots vs. Totalitarians: The Race for the Republic!

Patriots vs. Totalitarians: The race for the republic is on! As of now, 15 state legislatures have passed a Convention of States resolution; the latest being Mississippi. We are neck and neck with the totalitarians, who have 13 signatories pushing a national popular vote. The latest state to sign up for this Mordorian project is Delaware.

What are the differences between these two projects? Well, the patriots believe in the Constitution of the United States and the federalist principles therein. The Convention of States Project’s mission is to restore our governing document. They recognize an all-powerful, central government has become a threat to the American Creed of life, liberty, property and self-government.

What is the mission of the National Popular Vote? Well, if they were honest, it’s to ensure a one-party dictatorship in Washington D.C. Their goal is to circumvent our federalist system by violating the spirit of the Electoral College system. In order to accomplish this, they must ignore Article I, Section 10 which forbids states to engage in alliances, confederations, agreements or compacts. The National Popular Vote compact will not go into effect until they have reached 270 Electoral College votes, ensuring progressive hegemony.

The soldiers of Mordor believe our system is unfair. According to them, a national popular vote represents all voters, which is completely absurd. If they truly wish for a fair representation, they would advocate for each state to implement a partial Electoral College system. So far, only Nebraska and Maine have this type of system.

National Popular Vote advocates know the Democratic party’s constituency is mainly urban voters. They use bumper sticker slogans, such as, “One man, One vote!” to weaponize the ballot box. Liberal judges used this platitude in the infamous, Reynolds v. Sims case, which marginalized rural areas. This ruling is a direct violation of our federalist principles, and I would add, a primary cause for separatist movements in liberal states throughout the country. Can you imagine what will happen if these Mordorians do the same to flyover country? Can anyone say, the dissolution of the union?

Make no mistake about it: either we have a United States of America, or a Federal Government of America. The race for the republic is on!


Monday, March 18, 2019

Destruction of Monuments

I despise the Obama's, but there is no excuse to desecrate a monument to her family.  And that goes for any monument.

H/T: Free North Carolina


Underwear for your little Marxist superhero.  Gerbil not included.

H/T: Knuckledraggin

Saturday, March 16, 2019

Walkaway: Generations Walk Away from the Democratic Party

National Popular Vote is a Scheme to Undermine the Republic

Democrats are on a terror to find ways to win elections. They’ve successfully sued Republican controlled General Assemblies throughout the country forcing redistricting that’s favorable to their party. We’ve watched in horror as liberal precincts push their candidates over the top with last minute phantom ballots. And we’ve witnessed an attempted coup of a duly elected president by deep state embeds. 

The scheming never ends. Colorado’s governor signed into law that state’s participation in the National Popular Vote. This bill is a direct attack on our federalist principles. What Democrats want are urban populations ruling over the rest of us. This act is a direct violation of Article One, Section Ten which forbids a State to engage in alliances, confederations, agreements or compacts with other States. If these confederates reach their goal of 270 Electoral College votes, they should be sued for conspiring against our republic.

What’s worse, according to the law this fool just passed, Colorado’s popular vote is null and void if the national popular vote contradicts their outcome. This idiot just disenfranchised his voters and Electors. I guarantee you, this Democrat doesn’t care as long as his party gets the win.

Make no mistake, Democrats are a threat to the republic and this conspiracy is proof positive that they are mad for power.


Beto O'Rourke's Weird Cow Poem

The next time I get a lecture from a Democrat about our lack of culture and appreciation for the arts, I want to recite this poem written by Beto O’Rourke. This man is without a doubt a genius of the highest order. Ladies and gentleman, I present, “The Song of a Cow”:

I need a butt-shine,
Right now
You are holy,
Oh, sacred Cow
I thirst for you,
Provide Milk.

Buff my balls,
Love the Cow,
Good fortune for those that do.
Love me, breathe my feet,
The Cow has risen.

Wax my ass,
Scrub my balls.
The Cow has risen,
Provide Milk.

Thank god, he copyrighted this genius piece of work.
Here is a more dramatic interpretation. Byron, Kipling and Shelley have nothing on this guy.

Democrats Fear Citizenship in Decennial Census

Democrats fear nothing more than Americans rising up and demanding respect. One way to restore respect is to ensure an accurate count in the coming decennial census. We must separate the wheat from the chaff and the only way to do that is invoke citizenship status. If this were to come to pass, congressional districts would be realigned and the Electoral College would be diminished in states where illegal aliens reside. Ultimately, it would mean a loss of power and money for blue state Democrats. And they are fighting back.

Democrats such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez see this as nothing more than voter suppression and nativism. I thought illegal aliens weren’t allowed to vote. And since when is taking pride in citizenship a nativist act? According to AOC, illegal aliens are her constituents. Here is a little exchange between “The Boss” and Secretary Wilbur Ross:

"I'm sorry, I must reclaim my time," Ocasio-Cortez said.

"Mr. Kobach later sent an email to you on July 14, writing that the lack of the citizenship question ‘leads to the problem that aliens who do not actually reside in the United States are still counted for congressional apportionment services,'" she said.

"Of course they do reside in the United States. They reside in my district. They’re my constituents," she said of illegal aliens.

If illegal aliens were excluded from the census, I wonder if AOC would still have a job. Drinks anyone?


AOC: Socialism Guarantees Dignity

Nothing guarantees dignity like a third-world hellhole.

Antonin Scalia: Founders wisely put Convention of States in Constitution...

The Collapse of Western Civilization

Justice Democrats: Superheroes or Villains?

A socialist organization has popped-up on the scene and is roiling the Democratic party. They call themselves Justice Democrats, which implies they’re superheroes hellbent on saving the world from ourselves. I’m not so worried about the planet as I am for the citizens of this country if these nutters ever gain power. I’ve yet to find a socialist regime that wasn’t oppressive and murderous. Help save the planet? God save us!

This group is mainly comprised of idealistic millenials who have little life experience or wisdom. But that’s not their only deficit; I can barely find any background information on their leadership and one of its founders, which is surprising since millenials are notorious for their online ubiquity.

The only person I could find a proper bio for is Cenk Uygar, who was born in Istanbul, Turkey. His parents moved to the United States when he was eight years old. He apparently has dual citizenship which means his allegiance to the United States is in question, especially since Turkey is a Muslim country and therefore hostile to the American creed.

The other founder is Kyle Kulinski. He was born in West Chester, New York. I don’t know if his parents are immigrants, however, he is of Polish and Italian descent. Now, you would think that a kid with this heritage would be somewhat hesitant to embrace socialism since both NAZI and the U.S.S.R regime ravaged Poland during WWII and was later occupied by their Soviet masters. But think again. And let’s not forget Mussolini was a national socialist before he became a dictator. This is where a little wisdom and knowledge of history would go a long way.

Both Cenk Uygar and Kyle Kulinski left the Justice Democrats. Now this organization has new leadership whose backgrounds are just as opaque as Kulinski.

Alexandra Rojas currently lives in Tennessee. I found a blurb in an article that she tried to obtain in-state tuition at a California community college. Do they not have community colleges in Tennessee? Or did she move from California? And if she did, why did she apply for in-state tuition if she was a resident of California? Could it be she’s an illegal alien? That question is worthy of an answer. I thought we had laws against foreigners participating in our elections. As we’re finding out, laws don’t apply to progressives.

The same could be said of Nasim Thompson. We don’t know much about her except that she lives in California, and as far as I’m concerned, that whole state is suspect.

What we’re finding out is the majority of these Justice Democrats are immigrants or first generation “Americans.” And I hesitantly use that term, since none of these people subscribe to the American creed. For example, Saikat Chakrabarti is AOC’s chief of staff. We know he was born in Texas and nothing much beyond that. Who are his parents? Why did they come here? And why does this young man hero worship a known NAZI sympathizer, Subhas Chandra Bose?

I’m not finding too many heroes in the league of Justice Democrats. Just take a look at those who currently hold office. Not one of them believe in borders, or the enforcement of our immigration laws. These people were elected to office by a gangster constituency that hates Jews and patriotic Americans.

The situation is only going to get worse as more third-worlders invade the United States. People won’t be crying to save the planet; they’ll be screaming for God to save America!


Sunday, March 10, 2019

2019 Illegal Alien Invasion Exceeds D-Day

On June 6, 1944 Allied forces consisting of American, British and Canadian soldiers stormed the beaches of Normandy in what was named Operation Overlord. The initial invasion force numbered 156,000 along a 50 mile fortified coast. This deployment was the largest seaborne invasion in history. But it doesn’t compare to the third-world invasion that is happening on America’s southern border.

In February alone, the shortest month of the year, our border patrol encountered 76,000 illegal aliens trying to sneak into our country. If you include January’s numbers and those not caught, this third-world invasion exceeds the total number of soldiers who invaded Normandy on D-Day.

Last year’s numbers alone, are eye-popping. U.S. Border Patrol apprehended 396,000 foreign invaders, and those are ones we know about. Now compare that to the 2 million U.S. soldiers who participated in the European theater during WWII. This illegal alien invasion is less than 5 times that number. We must keep in mind that it was only 11 months from D-Day to VE-Day.

President Trump is right to call this a national emergency. This is an invasion.


The Brains Behind AOC Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Americans are Already Under a Medicare-For-All System

Democrats are always up to the challenge of extending centralized power over our lives, no matter the cost. Their latest scheme is to abolish private health insurance in lieu of a universal healthcare system under the auspice of Medicare. The projected price tag is $33 trillion over a decade.

We shouldn’t be surprised. These Marxist have been trying to fix our healthcare system for over 50 years with disastrous results. I would say that we’ve already in a Medicare-for-all system. Because of bad policy decisions, a third-party payer system has been instituted which has distorted the market. The patient/customer no longer participates in the cost/benefit analysis resulting in the high cost of healthcare.

So, since prices are no longer determined by the free market, who or what determines the cost? Why it’s Medicare, of course. Here is an excerpt from the Mercatus Center:

Payments for Medicare benefits substantially influence the prices paid by private-sector insurers. Many private insurers simply adopt Medicare’s levels of reimbursement to providers, and those that do not still are affected when Medicare changes its rates. Although analysts disagree about whether the link leads to lower or higher private payments, Medicare’s administrative pricing system clearly cannot replicate a well-functioning competitive market. What can be done to move Medicare closer to the optimal prices corresponding to those produced by a competitive market?

A new study published by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University assesses the numerous problems with Medicare’s price calculations and looks at how they affect prices in commercial insurance policies. The study proposes an arrangement of competitive bidding on bundles of services as a promising alternative to Medicare’s price-fixing regime.

Need I remind everyone that this is the same government that brought us $1000 toilet seats in the 1980’s. You would’ve thought they learned their lesson, but think again. Just recently, the Air Force paid $10,000 for a toilet seat cover. And everyone expects fiscal discipline from Washington D.C.?


Progressives Deconstruct Western Culture and Civilization

There is a concerted effort by progressives in academia, media and politics to deconstruct Western culture and civilization. Their goal is to uplift lesser cultures at the expense of the successful. These proselytizers dismiss Western achievement through attribution of geography and fantasized contributions by hostile philosophies such as Islam.

Who are these proselytizers and where do they come from? Many are cosmopolitan/globalists who want to fundamentally transform the West, indeed the world, into a singular, borderless society. Many of these people come from the third-world and refuse to assimilate and accept the failures of their native countries. We see these attitudes in the halls of Congress by representatives such as Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib. We also have representatives, who have the Latino-socialist mindset, that has doomed many a country into perpetual turmoil and poverty . Can anyone say Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Luis Gutierrez?

And what is their common refrain? Who are keeping these victims from achieving success? Why it’s the white-male patriarchy of course. According to these people, the American dream is an unobtainable fantasy. But, yet, I don’t see any of these complainers leaving. Don’t you find it amazing that former refugees had the wherewithal to leave their native countries to come to a bigger hellhole? I’m surprised they’re still here.

A perfect example of a third-world mentality is former president, Barack Hussein Obama. When the framers of our Constitution declared that only a native born citizen should hold the office of the presidency, they had this man in mind. Here is Article Two, Section One, Clause 5:

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of the President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen years a Resident within the United States.

A natural born citizen is required only for the presidency and no other office. Why is that and what is a natural born citizen? Here is the very definition as written in Vattel’s Law of Nations and as adopted by the Framers:

§ 212. Citizens and natives.

The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

Barack Hussein Obama’s father was a citizen of Kenya. Our former president adopted his father’s hostile behavior to the West. This man’s presidency was a testament to the deconstruction of American values. I am aware of no president who was as openly hostile to the American creed as this man, and this is due to the third-world mentality of his non-citizen father.

But the biggest purveyor of anti-Western philosophy and culture is in academia. There are professors who openly claim there’s no such thing as Western civilization and culture. A disproportionate come from third-world countries. Professor Kwame Anthony Appiah is one of them. His is a direct descendent of a warrior-emperor in pre-colonial Ghana. He has taught at many prestigious American universities. He wrote a lengthy column that was published in The Guardian entitled, There is No Such Thing as Western Civilisation. Here is an excerpt:

Someone asked Mahatma Gandhi what he thought of western civilisation, and he replied: “I think it would be a very good idea.” Like many of the best stories, alas, this one is probably apocryphal; but also like many of the best stories, it has survived because it has the flavour of truth. But my own response would have been very different: I think you should give up the very idea of western civilisation. It is at best the source of a great deal of confusion, at worst an obstacle to facing some of the great political challenges of our time. I hesitate to disagree with even the Gandhi of legend, but I believe western civilisation is not at all a good idea, and western culture is no improvement.

This written by a man who left Ghana and who now lives and prospers in the Western world. I wonder how well he’d do in his ancestral homeland had he went back and stayed. I guess we’ll never know.

And here is the blueprint for these cosmopolitan/globalists to delegitimize Western values and civilization:

Values aren’t a birthright: you need to keep caring about them. Living in the west, however you define it, being western, provides no guarantee that you will care about western civilisation. The values European humanists like to espouse belong just as easily to an African or an Asian who takes them up with enthusiasm as to a European. By that very logic, of course, they do not belong to a European who has not taken the trouble to understand and absorb them. The same, of course, is true in the other direction. The story of the golden nugget suggests that we cannot help caring about the traditions of “the west” because they are ours: in fact, the opposite is true. They are only ours if we care about them. A culture of liberty, tolerance, and rational inquiry: that would be a good idea. But these values represent choices to make, not tracks laid down by a western destiny.       

So there’s the plan, folks: the globalist are indoctrinating Westerners to not care or even think about our birthright. They want us to believe we are no different than any other civilization. And this will eventually happen with the importation of third-world invaders who believe they’re entitled to the riches of Western philosophy without assimilation. Afterall, diversity is the cornerstone of a well-adjusted civilization.


RENEGADE STATE: The Four Families Of California And The Private Company ...

Saturday, March 2, 2019

How the States Can Save America

Democrats to Hold Hearings on Fake News Crisis

Democrats are preparing congressional hearings on President Trump’s assertions that the mainstream media are fake news. Do we really need this dog and pony show? Conservatives have known about their bias for decades. But according to these dimwits in Washington D.C. any criticism of these professional propagandists is considered a constitutional crisis. They believe an attack on these slimeballs is an attack on the First Amendment, as though they are the sole proprietors on freedom of the press and speech.

These so-called journalist and their Beltway brethren are nothing more than society people. They have traded their integrity for approbation from well-connected elites. They care nothing about the truth; indeed they believe they can shape the truth as an ends to a means. These so-called professionals don’t deserve our respect. If anything they deserve our condemnation. President Trump has shown a light on this cockroach party and these pest resent being outed for the diseased vermin they are.

I happened upon a journal entry by Thoreau. I thought his post is as fitting today as it was back in 1852:

April 24. I know two species of men. The vast majority are men of society . They live on the surface ; they are interested in the transient and fleeting ; they are like driftwood on the flood. They ask forever and only the news, the froth and scum of the eternal sea . They use policy ; they make up for want of matter with manner. They have many letters to write. Wealth and the approbation of men is to them success . The enterprises of society are something final and sufficing for them. The world advises them, and they listen to its advice. They live wholly an evanescent life, creatures of circumstance. It is of prime importance to them who is the president of the day. They have no knowledge of truth, but by an exceedingly dim and transient instinct, which stereotypes the church and some other institutions . They dwell, they are ever, right in my face and eyes like gnats ; they are like motes, so near the eyes that, looking beyond, they appear like blurs; they have their being between my eyes and the end of my nose. The terra firma of my existence lies far beyond, behind them and their improvements. If they write, the best of there deal in "elegant literature ." Society, man, has no prize to offer me that can tempt me ; not one.

Shoo, Propagandists, don't bother me. You no longer have the power to persuade me and a growing number of Americans. We have seen through your veil and have witnessed your lies.


CPAC 2019 - President Donald J. Trump

Celestial Spider

by T.L. Coston

Powerful blows resound through the sky
Tears in a blackened veil reveal a bolt of light
High above a celestial spider mends the firmament
As torrential tears of rage makes a descent

Bellows from this struggle emit gusts of wind
Diligent, the spider exerts
Bombardments of light tatters its heavenly web;
Yet, he persistently works

A deity perturbed at the arachnids toil
Stikes his celestial mandible.
Severing the cloak, sunshine appears
The conflict comes to a close.

Michelle Malkin speaks at CPAC 2019: full speech

Michelle Malkin knows how to bring it.

Republicans Have the Tools to Deal with Sanctuary Cities

Politicians by nature are cowards. They’re like water: fluid in rhetoric and follow the least path of resistance. How nice for them to have established a European system in which bureaucrats have supplanted the legislative branch by process of an administrative state. Congress has reinvented themselves as overseers of the Great Washington D.C. Plantation. Isn’t that special? Tell me, where is that in the U.S. Constitution?

One only has to look at this illegal alien problem to see how dysfunctional Congress has become. Liberals love to declare our immigration system is broken. NO! It’s Congress that’s broken. There are ways to deal with sanctuary cities, activist judges and elected officials who aid and abet this third-world invasion. What we need is strong leadership from the Republican party and I’m not talking about President Trump. He’s shown remarkable courage in the face of this unrelenting liberal sh**storm. I’m talking about the sniveling cowards in the Senate and the House of Representatives.

When Republicans controlled both houses of Congress they could’ve invoked the 14th Amendment and declared sanctuary cities in a state of rebellion. This action would’ve disenfranchisement local officials and reduced that states representation in Congress and the Electoral College. However, I doubt they realize they even have that power.

You ask, what about liberal judges? Surely, these plaintiffs would win in the courts. Well, the dirty, little secret is that Congress has the power to limit judicial review. They’ve had it all along, but refuse to exercise their constitutional prerogatives. Article III, Section II specifically gives Congress the authority to regulate the Court’s jurisdiction. For those who doubt Congress has this power, I’ll refer to the Aldrich Amendment in the Hepburn Act of 1906:

The fight in the Senate was not yet over. In order to obtain sufficient votes for passage of the bill, Roosevelt (a Republican) for five weeks secretly had backed an amendment proposed by Democratic Senators Joseph Weldon Bailey Sr.(Mississippi) and Benjamin Ryan Tillman, Jr. (South Carolina) that would limit judicial review of ICC orders on unreasonable rates to questions involving the ICC’s authority and the constitutional rights of the railroads. On May 4th, however, when it was apparent that the Tillman-Bailey Amendment did not have the necessary votes, Roosevelt, without notice to Bailey and Tillman and much to their consternation, announced at a hastily called press conference that the President supported a “broad” judicial review amendment proposed by Republican Senator William Boyd Allison (Iowa); this amendment had no limits on the scope of such judicial review, leaving it to the courts to decide the scope of review.

Congress didn’t debate about their authority to limit judicial review. Quite, the contrary, it was the opposite. They debated the extent to which the courts were allowed to interpret the law.

You ask, what about a divided Congress? There isn’t much we can do about the Senate and it's current leadership, but we most definitely can raise hell in the House once we take it back and we can use the Constitution to back it up.

Article One, Section One specifically allows each house to make its own rules and Section 5 gives the authority for each house to qualify and seat its members. During Reconstruction, The House of Representatives refused to seat incoming members from the South who participated in the rebellion. Therefore, there is a precedent and federal judges don’t have a say. But this would require strong Republican leadership and as we all know, that is seriously lacking.

We do have options to deal with liberals in and outside of the Beltway. What we need is the backbone to use it.


Democrats are at War with the American Creed

Are Americans in a civil war? Obviously, we’re not in a hot war where armed militias face off in fields and streets. In that sense, we most definitely are not; but, in a larger sense, Americans have been in a civil war for decades. These battles are taking place in our courts, culture, institutions of higher learning and most recently in Washington D.C. where bureaucrats tried to commit a coup on a duly elected president.  The American creed is in the process of being destroyed.

Democrats are violating the very cornerstone of our republic and that is elections. They refuse to accept defeat. The greatest example of this is The National Democratic Redistricting Foundation founded by George Soros and headed by Eric Holder. The sole mission of this organization is to sue Republican controlled state legislatures and force favorable terms for the Democratic party. This is a naked power grab that has garnered little attention in the media. This is just one front of many.

This has gotten so bad, last week, a North Carolina judge ruled that two constitutional amendments, which were passed by an overwhelming majority by both state legislature and referendum, were invalid. This philosopher king took it upon himself to invalidate not only our elections, but any legislation that was passed during the tenure of this congress because he believes these districts are racially gerrymandered. Where in the hell does this punk get that kind of power? This guy, Judge Bryan Collins, received 51% of the vote in a liberal district; yet, he rules over us all. These actions by liberal judges are a microcosm of an undeclared war.

I’ve been sounding the bells for over a couple of years, and so have others. Daniel Greenfield gave a speech in South Carolina that sums up what is happening. Here is an excerpt:

The first time a Republican president was elected this century, they said he didn’t really win. The Supreme Court gave him the election. There’s a pattern here.

Trump didn’t really win the election. Bush didn’t really win the election. Every time a Republican president won an election this century, the Democrats insist he didn’t really win.

Now say a third Republican president wins an election in say, 2024.

What are the odds that they’ll say that he didn’t really win? Right now, it looks like 100 percent.

What do sure odds of the Dems rejecting the next Republican president really mean? It means they don’t accept the results of any election that they don’t win.

It means they don’t believe that transfers of power in this country are determined by elections.

That’s a civil war.

There’s no shooting. At least not unless you count the attempt to kill a bunch of Republicans at a charity baseball game practice. But the Democrats have rejected our system of government.

This isn’t dissent. It’s not disagreement.

You can hate the other party. You can think they’re the worst thing that ever happened to the country. But then you work harder to win the next election. When you consistently reject the results of elections that you don’t win, what you want is a dictatorship.

Your very own dictatorship.

I’m woke. How about you?