Showing posts with label incest. Show all posts
Showing posts with label incest. Show all posts

Thursday, January 8, 2015

An Example of Political Incest and Nepotism




If you want an example of nepotism and political incest, all you have to do is read this little blurb in National Journal about Barbara Boxer’s pending retirement from the Senate.

In an interview with her grandson Zach Rodham (who is also Hillary Clinton's nephew), Boxer said that while she will be leaving Congress, she will continue her work on Democratic politics. And when it came to 2016, she dropped a very large hint.

"Zach, I am never going to retire. The work is too important. But I will not be running for the Senate in 2016," Boxer said. "I have to make sure the Senate seat stays progressive. That is so critical. And I want to help our Democratic candidate for president make history."

Now we know why progressives espouse a degenerative philosophy.  They’re a bunch of inbreeds.




Source:

Sunday, October 12, 2014

Intra-Family Marriage. Who are We to Judge?




Since marriage is considered a right by activist judges, one must consider the possibilities.  Father and daughter, mother and son, brother and sister, first cousins should be free to marry.  After all, who are we to deny love?  That is the logic of the zeitgeist.

Marriage is no longer about procreation and a commitment by a couple to raise their own offspring.  No, it’s about tax breaks, pensions, and benefits.  If that is the case, then why shouldn’t a son be able to marry his father in order to save the family farm from punitive estate taxes?  Why can’t grandpa marry his granddaughter as a means to pass on his estate without greedy government agents stripping it bare?


Let’s take it a step further.  Why can’t citizens of a whole community marry as a demonstration of communal love? After all, aren’t we told it takes a village?  Marriage is a right!  Who are you to judge!

Sunday, July 13, 2014

Judge Rules: Incest is as Natural as Gay Marriage




We have just ridden down the slippery slope.  Courts have ruled homosexuality and gay marriage is as natural as the heat emanating from the sun.  So too is incest.  An Australian judge made an inevitable connection of the dots in his ruling:

He then mused his way into more trouble by spouting about the triad of abortion, rape and homosexuality as he discussed his evidentiary ruling.

“By that stage they are both mature adults. The complainant has been sexually awoken, shall we say, by having two relationships with men and she had become ‘free’ when the second relationship broke down,” the judge said, according to the Herald.

“The only thing that might change that is the fact that they were a brother and sister but we’ve come a long way from the 1950s,” he added.

“If this was the ’50s and you had a jury of 12 men there, which is what you’d invariably have, they would say it’s unnatural for a man to be interested in another man or a man being interested in a boy. Those things have gone.”

Yeah, this ain’t the ‘50s.  Why we’ve evolved.  Anything is possible without God.