Do you want evidence of actual collusion to rig an election? A federal judge ruled that the DNC conspired to nominate Hillary Clinton. Here is an excerpt from the Federalist Papers Project:
In a class-action lawsuit filed against the DNC and former chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the allegation was that the group was violating their own charter by rigging the state primaries for Clinton against Bernie Sanders. (It’s worth noting that even Harry Reid admitted it was rigged with his comment last year: “I knew – everybody knew – that this was not a fair deal.”)
The ruling, by Judge William Zloch was scathing: “In evaluating Plaintiffs’ claims at this stage, the Court assumes their allegations are true—that the DNC and Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Clinton and sought to propel her ahead of her Democratic opponent,” the judge wrote. Then he dismissed the lawsuit.
The judge agreed that there was collusion, but what are we to do about it? This sums up the Clinton family legacy.
Source:
No comments:
Post a Comment