Showing posts with label washington establishment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label washington establishment. Show all posts

Monday, May 12, 2014

Republican Establishment Spins Good News over Tea Party Defeat



Liberal rags love to publish op-ed pieces by RINO’s.  For almost a year, the Charlotte Disturber has featured Michael Gerson, a National Journal contributor and notorious establishment apologist, in their Sunday editions.  These two peas have a pod in common, they love bashing Tea Partiers.

Gerson portrays these patriots as a bunch of petulant children stomping their feet and demanding their Constitution.  When reading his articles, you get a sense that Tea Partiers need to have their asses spanked for demanding a bunch of nonsense.  Indeed, after last week’s primaries, Mr. Gerson is outright giddy over their defeat.  Here is an excerpt from his latest:

Tea Party leaders managed to confuse petulant, childish, counterproductive legislative tactics with constitutional fidelity. And Republican leaders finally realized that some Tea Party agendas — list building, fundraising, presidential primary positioning — were inconsistent with their own.
The government shutdown may turn out to have been the high-water mark — the Cemetery Ridge — of the Tea Party movement. In the aftermath, House Speaker John Boehner declared that Tea Party groups had “lost all credibility,” and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell promised that the party would “crush” outsiders targeting incumbents.

We had a government shutdown?  I didn’t notice, except for the Park Service harassing WWII vets on the national mall.  And wasn’t it reported that only one federal employee was laid off?  Again, I ask, what shut down?

Mr. Gerson believes we children need to be governed.  I would say the more apt word is managed.  Here is his condescending parting shot:

The main problem with the Tea Party movement is not tactical or tonal but ideological. Its leaders quote the Constitution to end political discussions: Where do you find the Environmental Protection Agency or the National Institutes of Health or Social Security in the language of the document? Most of the Founding Fathers (particularly the Federalist ones) saw the Constitution as the beginning of a political discussion: How does a free nation employ this remarkable structure to confront its problems and achieve its greatness?
Some quote the Constitution as a substitute for a policy agenda. It is easier, after all, to memorize than to govern. But a majority political party will convincingly address public needs: routine educational failure, increasing higher-education costs, gaps in health coverage and the like. This is what self-government under the Constitution looks like.
Yes, the GOP needs electable candidates. It also needs for those candidates to have something useful and hopeful to say.

Mr. Gerson, here is something useful to say.   Congress has abdicated their constitutional responsibilities.  We have federal bureaucracies running the show, and our elected representatives are the dog and pony show.  I’m not blowing tea party smoke.  The Wall Street Journal published the following:
Washington set a new record in 2013 by issuing final rules consuming 26,417 pages in the Federal Register. While plenty of government employees deserve credit for this milestone, leadership matters. And by this measure President Obama has never been surpassed in the Oval Office.
The latest rule-making tally comes from the Competitive Enterprise Institute's Wayne Crews, who on April 29 will publish his annual review of federal regulation in "Ten Thousand Commandments." This is important work because politicians and the media treat regulation as a largely cost-free public good. Mr. Crews knows better.
Congress may be mired in gridlock, but the federal bureaucracy is busier than ever. In 2013 the Federal Register contained 3,659 "final" rules, which means they now must be obeyed, and 2,594 proposed rules on their way to becoming orders from political headquarters.
The Federal Register finished 2013 at 79,311 pages, the fourth highest total in history. That didn't match President Obama's 2010 all-time record of 81,405 pages. But Mr. Obama can console himself by noting that of the five highest Federal Register page counts, four have occurred on his watch. The other was 79,435 pages under President George W. Bush in 2008.


How’s that for something useful to say, Mr. Establishment Republican?  Here’s another universal truth, you insiders aren’t going to do a damn thing about it.  Try and spin some hope out of that.



Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Sen. Ted Cruz Laments Versailles, D.C.



Well, the Washington D.C. establishment has once again told the American people to eat cake.  The whole country is watching the court of King Obama laugh at the peasants as they destroy their health care and country.  Why should they care?  The laws they pass don't apply to them.


Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Washington Establishment Whistling Past Tea Party Graveyard

The Washington Beltway and their MSM lapdogs would have everyone believe that the tea party was an aberration, and the 2010 elections a fluke. Well it’s time for the establishment to stop whistling past the graveyard. The defeat of RINO Dick Lugar should send chills down their authoritarian spines. The tea party specter is alive and well. And to the horror of our wannabe lords and masters, the patriots have become well organized.

The Woodstock, Ga.-based Tea Party Patriots reported raising $12.2 million for the year ended May 31, 2011. That vaults them into the ranks of some of the most successful conservative activist groups, including FreedomWorks, the Club for Growth and Americans for Tax Reform.

Nonprofit organizations’ annual tax returns are lagging indicators, of course, and the political-fundraising landscape has been evolving rapidly. But the Tea Party Patriots’ success underscores the continuing – perhaps even growing – power of the tea party.

Much attention has been focused this election season on super PACs and nonprofits – some with ties to the tea-party movement – that are raising large sums, often from wealthy donors, and pouring it into campaign-themed advertising.

By contrast, the Tea Party Patriots and their affiliated groups are generally staying focused on the grassroots ground game – training, issue education, webinars and tele-town halls, and mobilizing of volunteers. The Patriots say they have 3,500 local affiliates, as well as a mailing list of 310,000 small-dollar donors. They also say they’ve raised even more money for the 2012 fiscal year, although they declined to provide numbers.

It’s brick-by-brick organization building, and the results aren’t easily measured. But the Patriots leaders say they’re creating a structure that will last.

At the same time, the Patriots and other tea party groups are maturing, holding fewer raucous rallies and doing more phone-banking.

That report should make the Potomac Potlickers quake in their boots. There will be no more politics as usual.