The Road to Kabul Leads to American Universities

Americans are adrift in a sea of absurdity.  When did normalcy end and stupidity begin?  Twenty years ago, I would’ve laughed at the thought of gay marriage, transgender bathrooms, the criminalization of Christianity and the deconstruction of American history.  People are debating whether we should tear down monuments that honor the father of our country and the author of the Declaration of Independence!  This is madness!

Where did this insane ideology originate?  We can look no further than our university system.  These institutions of higher learning are awash in cash.  They are infested with tenured professors with dubious doctorates and credentials who teach suspect courses such as gender studies and social justice.  And you can bet, everyone of these “humanities” classes are laced with Marxist theory.

We shouldn’t be surprised that Barack Obama’s presidency ushered in this hostile transformation of American culture.  He and his colleagues are not only products of our university system; they are mentors to Antifa, Occupy Wall Street and thousands of mindless drones who would march against a free speech rally in Boston, Mass.

I recently watched a documentary on the history of Afghanistan and was surprised to discover that this jihadi wasteland was once a hippie resort in the 60’s & 70’s.  That’s right.  Half-naked, peace loving dope smokers wandered throughout the countryside unmolested.  So what happened?

Foreign investors, who wanted influence in this region, flooded the country with capital and a lot of that money went to Kabul University.  Marxists took over that institution; indoctrinated their students; who then infiltrated the military and eventually took over the country.  These indoctrinates forcibly began to fundamentally transform Afghanistan.  Thousands of unfortunates who resisted were imprisoned and/or murdered.  This resistance endangered the Soviet Union’s puppet regime and they eventually invaded with disastrous results.

These are the seeds of Afghani radicalism, and Kabul University was the flowerbed.  This same ideology has infiltrated our American university system.

Take a look around at this insanity.  I ask you, what ideology requires a people to renounce their history, culture and religious beliefs?  What ideology sanitizes people of their past sins?  What ideology requires a fundamental transformation?  Finally, where has Marxism ever been successful?     

Progressives Promote the Ghettoization of America

Lip-smacking Marxists crave nothing more than a great leveling of American society.  They’ve concocted all sorts of half-baked schemes to disenfranchise the citizenry, except of course, themselves.  The most obvious is global warming scientists fattening their wallets with government grants by skewing data to reach predetermined results.  Government organizations use that research to promote and enhance an authoritative state.  And so it goes, governmental agencies bribing institutions with cash for corruption.

Not all scientists and institutions have been tainted by the federal mafia.  There are principled individuals who’ve questioned and spoken out against this fraud.  We do have watchdogs treeing these robbers of integrity and treasury.  However, there are more insidious schemes that are harder to tackle; schemes that are designed to ghettoize America.

Our so-called institutions of higher learning have, for decades, promoted multiculturalism, not as an American melting pot where cultures meld into a common weal, but as a tool for contention and tribalism.  Progressives have nurtured minority resentment by emphasizing and exaggerating Western crimes against the third-world.  This manifests itself into a sense of entitlement from the perceived aggrieved and guilt by European ancestry.

This yin and yang of multicultural sophistry has become a catalyst for denouncing our founding principles of life, liberty, property and ultimately prosperity.  An Obama appointee for a judgeship in a District Court in Minnesota exemplifies this dangerous philosophy.  Here is an excerpt from Daniel Horowitz’s article in Conservative Review:

On Tuesday afternoon, Republicans will vote to confirm Wilhelmina Marie Wright, a sitting member of the Minnesota state Supreme Court, to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. Just who is Ms. Wright?

Writing a short entry for the UCLA Law Review in 1990 (page 18-19 of PDF), Ms. Wright brazenly asserted that, “[T]he practice of American racism is based on two principles: the sanctity of property and the belief in the hierarchy of races.” She concludes as follows:

The failure of today’s racial discourse is its reliance on the notion that property is neutral, that the deed to a suburban home is ‘property’ while the opportunity to move out of a slum is not. The fungibility of property can be no better exemplified than it is by slavery. The fact that our Constitution once recognized one person’s very life and liberty as another’s property should teach us the danger of letting property determine liberty rather than looking to liberty to define property.

The original sin of slavery is forever ingrained in the aggrieved even though not one of these people has experienced the restrains of a shackle except for the one that strangles their minds and for that they are willing to destroy every vestige that has been the envy of the world for over 200 years.

Mr. Horowitz further explains:

If you want to know why every Democrat-appointed and many GOP-appointed judges believe the Constitution is unconstitutional, here’s the source. They oppose the fundamental negative rights expressed in our founding documents, replace them with man-made positive rights for favored classes, and point to flaws with the settlement of our continent with regard to slavery as justification for upending the Constitution outside the legitimate amendment process.

Thus we have special rights for the aggrieved and second class status for the “inheritors of wealth and prosperity” which are those who are cursed with white privilege.  Let the ghettoization of America begin!

Source:

https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2016/01/gop-to-confirm-property-rights-are-white-and-racist-judge#sthash.8nslIMSd.dpuf

Obama's U.N. Ambassador Signs Marxist Utopian Program

Once again, the Obama administration uses a pen and a phone to implement Marxist utopian idealism at the expense of American sovereignty.  This time President Barack Hussein Mussolini empowered his ambassador to sign off on a United Nations Sustainable Development program and then quoted a renowned communist.  Gateway Pundit reported the following:

These “goals“, designed to eradicate world poverty and fight Climate Change, include the Socialist ideals of universal healthcare, universal education, universal employment, and wealth redistribution, all of which must in place by 2030.

On Thursday night, the eve of the U.N. Summit, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., Samantha Powers (pictured above), gave a speech in support of the new U.N. Sustainable Development goals where she quoted Communist influenced economist, Amartya Sen:

“I want to open my remarks with a quote from the master, “Development requires the removal of major sources of unfreedom: poverty as well as tyranny, poor economic opportunities as well as systematic social deprivation, neglect of public facilities as well as intolerance or over-activity of repressive states.” This goes to the essence of Goal 16 in the SDGs, which as you know world leaders will adopt within the next few hours. But it was written nearly two decades ago – by Amartya. And, I would only say, I wish the world had come around to his vision a little bit sooner – we could have probably spared a lot of people a lot of heartache.”

We’re governed by traitors and fools.  Does anyone have an idea how they’ll implement this utopian nonsense?  I’m sure they’re looking upon the American people with a covetous eye.  Here are a couple of excerpts from their declaration:

Section 27:

We will seek to build strong economic foundations for all our countries. Sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth is essential for prosperity. This will only be possible if wealth is shared and income inequality is addressed.  

Section 28:

We commit to making fundamental changes in the way that our societies produce and consume goods and services. Governments, international organizations, the business sector and other non-State actors and individuals must contribute to changing unsustainable consumption and production patterns, including through the mobilization, from all sources, of financial and technical assistance to strengthen developing countries’ scientific, technological and innovative capacities to move towards more sustainable patterns of consumption and production.

  

Here is the price tag for this global initiative as reported by the Guardian:

The world’s development agenda is about to become more expensive than ever. At the UN’s Third Financing for Development conference, in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, between 13-16 July, world leaders will look for ways to pay for the ambitious and costly sustainable development goals (SDGs), which include ending poverty and achieving food security in every corner of the globe by 2030.

Addis is about moving from billions in financing commitments to trillions.

The specific targets for each goal, which have not been formally agreed yet, will take over from the millennium development goals (MDGs) at the end of the year. According to UN estimates, for the new goals to be met will require as much as $11.5tn a year, $172.5tn over the 15-year timeframe.

That’s trillions, folks.  Since this is a government sponsored project, you can expect the price tag to go up a hundredfold by the time they’re through.

Source:

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/09/obama-ambassador-to-un-quotes-communist-to-push-new-socialist-un-sustainable-development-goals/

http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/69/L.85&Lang=E

http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/news/financing/final-push-for-ffd3.html

http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2015/jul/13/addis-ababa-development-finance-summit-all-you-need-to-know-sustainable-development-goals

Red Pope Accepts "Commie Cross" from Bolivian President

Pope Francis “The Red” received an unusual gift from Bolivian President Evo Morales that sums up the social, political and economic philosophy of these third world natives: a crucifix carved into a hammer and sickle.

The Red Pope paid homage to fellow Jesuit and Marxist activist, Rev. Luis Espinal, who was slain in 1980.  The “commie crucifix” was designed by this very priest.  Needless to say, the implication of such a gift puts an exclamation point on what everyone thinks about this pope.

The Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, said Thursday the pope had no idea that Espinal had designed the crucifix and was surprised to receive it — a reaction clearly visible in the footage of the encounter. Some reports suggested the pope told Morales "This isn't good;" one of Francis' friends sent a tweet quoting him as saying such. But Lombardi said it wasn't known what the pope had said.

Lombardi said Espinal had designed the crucifix as a symbol of dialogue and commitment to freedom and progress for Bolivia, not with any specific ideology in mind. Lombardi said he personally wasn't offended by it.

"You can dispute the significance and use of the symbol now, but the origin is from Espinal and the sense of it was about an open dialogue, not about a specific ideology," Lombardi said.

Sure, run with that why you don’t.  The Vatican has done a 180.  Pope John Paul II fought communism and Francis has embraced it.  What a difference a pope makes.

Source:

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20150709/lt--pope-communist_crucifix-f025b21fae.html

Obamacare's Federal/Big Insurance Utopian Dreams

A couple of months ago, I hypothesized about a possible collusion between the federal government and prominent health insurance companies.  I stated they would find a way to incorporate a Federal Reserve like system that would sanction and protect companies like Blue Cross and Blue Shield, while they in turn ceded power to the federal government.  It looks like my hypothesis is coming true.

The Progressives have an additional bonus.  They are realizing their Marxist dreams:  from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.  Carolina Journal reported the following:

Devon Herrick, senior fellow and health economist at the Dallas, Texas-based National Center for Policy Analysis, said his organization expects major restructuring of the health insurance market over the next decade, and lots of employers to start dropping coverage nationally due to Medicaid expansion and subsidized health exchanges.

“We predict a lot of firms will find a way to get out of providing coverage,” Herrick said.

“I suspect that we will see employers taking a wait-and-see approach,” Allen countered, with none wanting to be the first to drop its insurance coverage benefit even though it would be cheaper to pay the Obamacare tax penalty for not providing insurance than to pay the employer share of insurance premiums.

“I think a lot of people are carefully watching what employers do, and especially what the larger employers do,” Allen said.

“All the products on the exchanges have to be qualified health plans,” and insurance carriers are required to provide the same “scope of coverage,” he said.

“We’ll be offering a full choice,” he said, “to make sure consumers get the products they want. They’ll look a lot like our products look today.”

Blue Cross would slot buyers into different medal levels descending from platinum and gold to silver and bronze. The higher levels would have richer coverage and higher costs, Allen said. “Bronze covers less of the total cost than, say, a platinum does.”

As a general rule of thumb, Blue Cross would offer “the same set of products to folks regardless of their income level,” Allen said. “So a bronze plan will be the same for someone at 20 percent of the federal poverty level as someone at 400 percent of the federal poverty level.”

The difference would be in awarding higher subsidies to lower-income individuals to offset premium costs.

“Obviously lower-income gets a bigger subsidy. Folks making less than 250 percent of the federal poverty level get a richer option if they choose a silver plan,” Allen said. “The plan has less out-of-pocket costs for the customer.”

So basically, the rich will pay more for health insurance while at the same time subsidizing the care of others who can’t afford the Obamacare premiums.  Who knew utopia was a federal government program away?

Source:  http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusives/display_exclusive.html?id=10087

Frogleg University: Radicals Have Taken Over America

Frogleg University has a lesson plan that would counter the Marxist radicals who have taken over America: downsize the mainstream media and expand private schools.

The liberal media is already being downsized; however expanding private schools is a harder nut to crack. A friend of mine related an experience he had with a Catholic school. Liberal parents filed an application to enroll their children; however, they didn’t care for the “indoctrination” of Christianity.  They wanted the benefit of a superior education without all that “Christ” stuff.  So, they asked this Catholic school to change their curriculum.

Yeah, that’s what we’re dealing with.

H/T:  Moonbattery

U.S. Dept of Labor: Workers of the World Unite!

American workers (what’s left of us) can take pride in knowing that not only are we subsidizing our fellow countrymen through government welfare programs; we’re also financing labor unions in foreign countries.  The defunct International Workers of the World would’ve been proud to witness this moment.  Too bad this Marxist organization suffered an ignominious death when their leaders were expelled to the workers’ paradise of Lenin’s Soviet Union.  Congratulations Progressives, you’ve accomplished what generations of Americans have fought against:  a redistribution of wealth to the world’s proletariat.

(CNSNews.com) - Labor Secretary Hilda Solis on Thursday announced a $2.2 million grant that will be used to strengthen budding labor unions in Haiti and Peru.

The taxpayer money will fund projects organized by the AFL-CIO's Solidarity Center, which aims to build a global labor union movement.

"Supporting the ability to organize and protect their rights is important to leveling the playing field for all workers," Solis said in a news release. "This grant will help organizations in Haiti and Peru engage in productive, effective negotiations with governments and employers on behalf of vulnerable workers."

In Haiti, the Solidarity Center will work with the apparel export sector, focusing particularly on issues related to freedom of association (the right to unionize), sexual harassment and forced overtime.

In Peru, the project will focus on the needs of temporary and fixed-term contract workers.

Just last week, the Labor Department awarded $35 million to address child labor in seven countries in Africa, Latin America and Indonesia.

Since 1995, the Labor Department's Bureau of International Labor Affairs has worked with other governments and international organizations to “ensure that workers around the world are treated fairly and are able to share in the benefits of the global economy.”

Source: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/labor-dept-spending-2m-boost-worker-solidarity-haiti-and-peru

UNC Health Care CEO Wants to Compel Citizens into Single-Payer Program

UNC Health Care CEO, John Roper stood before state legislators and decried the inadequate health care Americans are receiving.   He believes the only way to cure the ailments of the collective is a single-payer system.  And he doesn’t care if you like your plan or not.  As a matter of fact, he believes we should be “compelled” into a universal (Marxist) health care system.  Here is an excerpt from a Carolina Journal article:

Under the current American health care system, Roper said, hospitals have to charge people who can pay more money to compensate for those who can’t pay.

He said “a more sensible approach” would be to set up “one insurance scheme for everybody and charge premiums to people who could afford to pay it, and a sliding scale for those who couldn’t. Then [provide] subsidies for those and the bottom of the scale, and then collect the money and pay the bills … that works in other countries.”

The host noted that the system Roper was advocating sounded “suspiciously” like a single-payer system, and Roper confirmed that was what he was describing.

“The problem with that here is it runs counter to our tradition of radical individualism and Americans having great distrust of major government programs,” Roper said.

“None of the reforms that Americans would find reasonable will work unless most if not all of our population is in the system,” he continued. “Unless people can be compelled … and I’ll use the word compelled… to make plans and buy insurance ahead of time then the only people who will buy it are those that have these chronic, serious illnesses, or pre-existing conditions.”

How is it that Mr. Roper comes to his statist solutions?  Well, he once served as head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  He is a big government bureaucrat.  Go figure.

And as it goes with our wannabe lord and masters, Mr. Roper believes health care cost is too high, mainly due to obstinate Americans not willing to exercise preventive care.  He also stated that any meaningful reforms would incur “cost controls.”  Can anyone say Death Panels?

The assertions of Mr. Roper have been easily refuted by Dr. Andrew Foy.  Here are few excerpts, again published by Carolina Journal:

Foy agrees that the health care costs are spiraling out of control, but blames government intervention for the problem and argues that more government intervention is not the solution.

“Prior to the advent of Medicare and Medicaid, individuals paid for the majority of medical goods and services out of their own pocket and utilized health insurance as a rational tool for mitigating financial risk posed by catastrophic events,” Foy wrote in another article. “During this time a real market existed for the vast majority of medical goods and services, and prices were reasonable.”

But after these government programs came into existence, private insurance companies also began covering health care “maintenance” to remain competitive, he said, causing third-party spending on routine medical services to increase and out-of-pocket spending to fall.

The result, he wrote, is “consumers now use many medical services that they would simply reject if they had to pay for them out of pocket — and truthfully, in most cases, they would be none the worse off for rejecting them.”

Try explaining that to a statist like Mr. Roper.

Source:  http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusives/display_exclusive.html?id=9750

Students Celebrate Marxism/Socialism after Obama Win

Why don't we follow Argentina's example and allow 15 year olds to vote.  They're about as mature and informed as this bunch.

It Takes a Village to Make a Sandwich

IPCC Conspires to Confiscate Wealth Through International Climate Change Court

If you thought Barack Obama and his Marxist pals in the Democratic Party where masters of class warfare rhetoric; just wait until we get the brunt end of a cudgel at an international level. The United Nations is holding a climate change conference in Durbin, South African. These conspirators are devising a way to undermine the nation state, and confiscate the wealth of the more successful through the means of an international climate change court of justice.

Fox News reported the machinations of these thugs:

The rules of the road the court would presumably enforce are based on the view that these developed countries owe developing countries a "debt" over climate change, and must provide financial aid in addition to taking major steps toward cutting emissions.

In one section, the document calls for developed countries to help poorer countries with "finance, technology and capacity building" so they can "adapt to and mitigate climate change" while helping eliminate poverty. Another section provides that developing countries should receive an amount of money equal to the amount "developed countries spend on defense, security and warfare."

Yet the document also calls for a guaranteed end to warfare altogether -- for the sake of curbing climate change.

One section, noting that "conflict-related activities emit significant greenhouse gas emissions," calls on all parties to "cease destructive activities" like warfare -- and then channel the money that would have been spent on war and other defense projects toward "a common enemy: climate change."

The document also asserts the "rights of mother earth," a concept that environmental activists have been pushing for.

Mother earth has rights? What in the hell is that supposed to mean? Do we have a transcendental being that can channel the grievances of the earth? And who will sit in judgment … third-world dictators? Have we all gone mad?

I believe the common enemy of all free peoples is the United Nations. How long are the American people going to put up with their nonsense?

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/10/un-floats-global-climate-court-to-enforce-emissions-rules/#ixzz1gFJ753VW

Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. Wants to Adopt The Soviet Union Constitution

Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. stood on the House floor and demanded that we adopt provisions of the now defunct Soviet Union Constitution.  He believes that all Americans have a right to housing, food, and education.  All of this is outlined in that Marxist doctrine that has proven to be a failure. 

The only thing that Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. mentioned that was a fundamental right that was not outlined in the old U.S.S.R's Constitution were IPods and laptop computers.  I'm sure had they been invented at the time, Uncle Joe would have had mandated it.

Here are the some of the articles of rights of the old Soviet Union:


Article 40. Citizens of the USSR have the right to work (that is, to guaranteed employment and pay in accordance wit the quantity and quality of their work, and not below the state-established minimum), including the right to choose their trade or profession, type of job and work in accordance with their inclinations, abilities, training and education, with due account of the needs of society.




This right is ensured by the socialist economic system, steady growth of the productive forces, free vocational and professional training, improvement of skills, training in new trades or professions, and development of the systems of vocational guidance and job placement.


Article 41. Citizens of the USSR have the right to rest and leisure.


This right is ensured by the establishment of a working week not exceeding 41 hours, for workers and other employees, a shorter working day in a number of trades and industries, and shorter hours for night work; by the provision of paid annual holidays, weekly days of rest, extension of the network of cultural, educational, and health-building institutions, and the development on a mass scale of sport, physical culture, and camping and tourism; by the provision of neighborhood recreational facilities, and of other opportunities for rational use of free time.


The length of collective farmers' working and leisure time is established by their collective farms.


Article 42. Citizens of the USSR have the right to health protection.


This right is ensured by free, qualified medical care provided by state health institutions; by extension of the network of therapeutic and health-building institutions; by the development and improvement of safety and hygiene in industry; by carrying out broad prophylactic measures; by measures to improve the environment; by special care for the health of the rising generation, including prohibition of child labour, excluding the work done by children as part of the school curriculum; and by developing research to prevent and reduce the incidence of disease and ensure citizens a long and active life.


Article 43. Citizens of the USSR have the right to maintenance in old age, in sickness, and in the event of complete or partial disability or loss of the breadwinner.


The right is guaranteed by social insurance of workers and other employees and collective farmers; by allowances for temporary disability; by the provision by the state or by collective farms of retirement pensions, disability pensions, and pensions for loss of the breadwinner; by providing employment for the partially disabled; by care for the elderly and the disabled; and by other forms of social security.


Article 44. Citizens of the USSR have the rights to housing.


This right is ensured by the development and upkeep of state and socially-owned housing; by assistance for co-operative and individual house building; by fair distribution, under public control, of the housing that becomes available through fulfilment of the programme of building well-appointed dwellings, and by low rents and low charges for utility services. Citizens of the USSR shall take good care of the housing allocated to them.


Article 45. Citizens of the USSR have the right to education.


This right is ensured by free provision of all forms of education, by the institution of universal, compulsory secondary education, and broad development of vocational, specialised secondary, and higher education, in which instruction is oriented toward practical activity and production; by the development of extramural, correspondence and evening courses, by the provision of state scholarships and grants and privileges for students; by the free issue of school textbooks; by the opportunity to attend a school where teaching is in the native language; and by the provision of facilities for self-education.

Source:  http://www.departments.bucknell.edu/russian/const/77cons02.html

A Disingenuous Film Maker Goes to Madison, Wisconsin

Michael Moore is a hypocrite. This man is a millionaire and yet he’s talking about confiscating the wealth of others. If he’s such a big believer in the collective, why doesn’t he donate his money to the federal government?


I’m not a fan of Senator John McCain, but he was spot on of his critique of the fat man from Flint, Michigan:

Now, Mr. Moore feigns concern over the Wisconsin public employee unions, while he avoided hiring union contractors on his latest documentary, “Capitalism:  A Love Story”.

Moore’s council to the unions reminds me of the relationship of Wormtongue and King Theoden:  Life suckingly deceptive.

Source:  http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/item_sCK9AXSEsqhAtwpyoUkv5K#ixzz1FpdXGbcO

United Nations Wants to Redistribute Our Wealth

The United Nations wants to confiscate 2% of the worlds GDP so as to implement a new “social justice” program. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said, “No one should live below a certain income level, and everyone should have access to essential public services such as water and sanitation, health and education.”


This quasi-world government organization wants to use a Marxist front group called the International Labour Organization to redistribute the wealth. The ILO currently has 183 members and their delegates are scheduled to meet in June. Ostensibly, they are mapping out a long term strategy to provide financial security to the world’s poor. They believe that everyone is “entitled” to the following:

-- basic income security for children;

-- access to some social assistance for people of working age that prevents them from falling into absolute food poverty;

-- a basic old-age pension for people over a certain age;

-- and essential health services for all


And guess who is going to pay for that. That’s right we are. Apparently, this den of thieves doesn’t believe that we are entitled to the fruits of our labor, as Thomas Jefferson noted in his first inaugural address:

a wise and frugal Government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government, and this is necessary to close the circle of our felicities.

No one can accuse the United Nations of good governance.

Source: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/no-one-should-live-below-certain-income

John Holdren Wants to "Educate Us" on Global Warming

Obama’s science czar wants to “educate” us on our wrongheadedness on global warming, now called climate change:

“It is an education problem. I think we have to educate them,” said John Holdren, who heads the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, in an interview broadcast Sunday.

The Obama administration needs its propaganda arm, because the 112th Congress isn’t buying their pseudo science.

“We need better energy technology both to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, to improve the environment, including reducing our contribution to climate change, and to create the jobs in clean energy, the new products, the new businesses that will stay in America, while meeting our growing energy needs,” Holdren said.

He later added: “The president realizes that we need all the new energy sources we can get. We need energy sources that reduce our contribution to production of greenhouse gases that are altering the climate, we need those new energy sources to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and we need them to stay competitive in a global market.”

I wonder what techniques they will use to re-educate us. They've targeted the children and put them in camps known as public schools. Cass Sustein may have to do the same with us recalcitrants. You know, give us a little push:




Our betters want us to be like the ox and have no thought. The government will provide everything. We must honor the children whose minds are not corrected by the past. Now is year zero and everything is to start anew.

Source: http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/141143-white-house-official-cites-capitol-hill-education-problem-on-climate-

An Unholy Alliance Between the Professional Left and Islam

A mutual hatred of freedom and western capitalism has forged an unholy alliance between two groups: Muslims and Socialist. This alliance has existed for decades in Europe and is now blossoming in America.

The following quotes are from FrontPageMag.Com:

The union of Islam and the left is celebrated in France by Olivier Besançonneau, leader of the French Trotskyites. He said of Muslims: "Are these not the new slaves? Is it not natural they should unite with the working class to destroy the capitalist system?" The French Communist Party commissioned a study to examine the electoral potential of forging alliances with Muslim groups. Already, leftist French groups such as the Revolutionary Communist League (Ligue Communiste Révolutionnaire) and Workers' Struggle (Lutte Ouvri ère) have allied themselves with Islamists to gain seats in the European Parliament.

Muslims find this temporary alliance advantageous. The divide and conquer strategy is a means to an end for their vision of a worldwide Caliphate:

Davis noted that in August 2002, Ayman al-Zawahiri, Al Qaeda's deputy leader, had urged British Muslims to seek alliances among "any movement that opposes America, even atheists." Abu Hamza had said to his followers: "We say to anyone who hates the Americans and wants to throw the Jews out of Palestine - Ahlan wa Sahlan (welcome). The Prophet teaches that we could ally ourselves even with the atheists if it helps us destroy [the] enemy."

Americans are emphatically against the building of the Ground Zero Mosque. The Left and their Islamist allies counter, that those who oppose the building of this effrontery are a bunch of Islamophobes, a typical tactic to shut up the opposition:

The language of the proponents of the Black-Red Alliance is confrontational when dealing with valid criticisms of Islamists and Muslim extremists. The main term used to silence criticism is "Islamophobe." In Britain, a website has been in existence for more than a year, calling itself Islamophobia-watch. This site is run by two individuals. One is Eddie Truman, who is both a member of Britain's Communist Party and spokesman of the Scottish Socialist Party. The main writer, who describes critics of Islamist radicalism as "right-wing racists" and "Islamophobes," calls himself Martin Sullivan. His real identity is Bob Pitt, the formerly secretary of the Workers Revolutionary Party



Hopefully the Professional Left and their Islamist allies will not have the same success in the United States as they have had in Europe.



Source: http://97.74.65.51/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=26365

Ex-Soviet Paper laughs at Obama's America

The following article was published by the ex-Soviet Union propaganda paper: Pravda.


It must be said, that like the breaking of a great dam, the American descent into Marxism is happening with breath taking speed, against the back drop of a passive, hapless sheeple, excuse me dear reader, I meant people.


True, the situation has been well prepared on and off for the past century, especially the past twenty years... The initial testing grounds was conducted upon our Holy Russia and a bloody test it was. But we Russians would not just roll over and give up our freedoms and our souls, no matter how much money Wall Street poured into the fists of the Marxists.


Those lessons were taken and used to properly prepare the American populace for the surrender of their freedoms and souls, to the whims of their elites and betters.

First, the population was dumbed down through a politicized and substandard education system based on pop culture, rather than the classics. Americans know more about their favorite TV dramas than the drama in DC that directly affects their lives. They care more for their "right" to choke down a McDonalds burger or a Burger King burger than for their constitutional rights. Then they turn around and lecture us about our rights and about our "democracy". Pride blind the foolish.


Then their faith in God was destroyed, until their churches, all tens of thousands of different "branches and denominations" were for the most part little more than Sunday circuses and their televangelists and top protestant mega preachers were more than happy to sell out their souls and flocks to be on the "winning" side of one pseudo Marxist politician or another. Their flocks may complain, but when explained that they would be on the "winning" side, their flocks were ever so quick to reject Christ in hopes for earthly power. Even our Holy Orthodox churches are scandalously liberalized in America .


The final collapse has come with the election of Barack Obama. His speed in the past three months has been truly impressive. His spending and money printing has been a record setting, not just in America 's short history but in the world. If this keeps up for more than another year, and there is no sign that it will not, America at best will resemble the Weimar Republic and at worst Zimbabwe.


These past two weeks have been the most breath taking of all. First came the announcement of a planned redesign of the American Byzantine tax system, by the very thieves who used it to bankroll their thefts, losses, and swindles of hundreds of billions of dollars. These make our Russian oligarchs look little more than ordinary street thugs, in comparison. Yes, the Americans have beat our own thieves in the shear volumes. Should we congratulate them?


These men, of course, are not an elected panel but made up of appointees picked from the very financial oligarchs and their henchmen who are now gorging themselves on trillions of American dollars, in one bailout after another. They are also usurping the rights, duties, and powers of the American congress (parliament). Again, congress has put up little more than a whimper to their masters.


Then came Barack Obama's command that GM's (General Motors) president step down from leadership of his company. That is correct, dear reader, in the land of "pure" free markets, the American president now has the power, the self-given power, to fire CEOs and we can assume other employees of private companies, at will. Come hither, go dither, the centurion commands his minions.


So it should be no surprise, that the American president has followed this up with a "bold" move of declaring that he and another group of unelected, chosen stooges will now redesign the entire automotive industry and will even be the guarantee of automobile policies. I am sure that if given the chance, they would happily try and redesign it for the whole of the world, too. Prime Minister Putin, less than two months ago, warned Obama and UK's Blair, not to follow the path to Marxism, it only leads to disaster. Apparently, even though we suffered 70 years of this Western sponsored horror show, we know nothing, as foolish, drunken Russians, so let our "wise" Anglo-Saxon fools find out the folly of their own pride.


Again, the American public has taken this with barely a whimper...but a "free man" whimper.


So, should it be any surprise to discover that the Democratically controlled Congress of America is working on passing a new regulation that would give the American Treasury department the power to set "fair" maximum salaries, evaluate performance, and control how private companies give out pay raises and bonuses? Senator Barney Frank, a social pervert basking in his homosexuality (of course, amongst the modern, enlightened American societal norm, as well as that of the general West, homosexuality is not only not a looked down upon life choice, but is often praised as a virtue) and his Marxist enlightenment, has led this effort.. He stresses that this only affects companies that receive government monies, but it is retroactive and taken to a logical extreme, this would include any company or industry that has ever received a tax break or incentive.


The Russian owners of American companies and industries should look thoughtfully at this and the option of closing their facilities down and fleeing the land of the Red as fast as possible.. In other words, divest while there is still value left.


The proud American will go down into his slavery without a fight, beating his chest, and proclaiming to the world, how free he really is.. The world will only snicker