Showing posts with label rebellion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rebellion. Show all posts

Sunday, September 24, 2017

Time to Declare: California is in a State of Rebellion



California is in a state of rebellion.  Their General Assembly passed a bill that gives sanctuary to millions of illegal aliens and are suing the Trump administration for building a wall.  This state is basically flouting our nation’s immigration laws.  They have become the Crimea of Mexico.


We cannot afford a populous state such as California to run roughshod over the rule of law and our nation’s sovereignty.  They have 53 House representatives along with 55 Electoral College votes.  It is safe to say that illegal aliens have more influence in Washington D.C. than American citizens and it is time to put a stop to it.  It is time to declare, California is in a state of rebellion.  


When the Yankees conquered the South in the War of Northern Aggression they passed the 14th Amendment which disenfranchised those who participated in the rebellion.  Sections 2 and 3 prohibited rebels from holding public office and reduced their representation in the House, along with their Electoral College votes.  



This measure didn’t just pertain to Confederate soldiers and a specific time period.  Twenty years after Reconstruction, a congressman reintroduced disenfranchisement as a form of punishment.  Here is an excerpt from Capitol Men:


In 1898, the Republican congressman Edgar D. Crumpacker of Indiana suggested that a 40 percent reduction in the Southern representation in Congress would adequately reflect the extensive disenfranchisement of Southern black citizens.  During the South Carolina convention, the Tillman forces had actually agreed that they would willingly reduce the state’s representation in the electoral college and in Congress, if necessary, because from their perspective, the ability to dominate state politics along racial lines meant far more than having a slightly larger voice in Washington.
 


The last black Southerner in Congress at the time,  North Carolina’s George H. White, also advocated for disenfranchisement.  Here is another excerpt:



White had remained true to the emancipation vision of Douglass and the postwar black Republicans, and in Congress he did not hesitate to assail racial injustice and inequality head-on.  Among other initiatives, he revived the idea that Southern states deserved a diminished representation in Congress because of their broad disenfranchisement of blacks…


Here is an interesting tidbit further down the paragraph:



...and he demanded that his white colleagues stop telling “darkie stories” and using “dialect and old plantation language” when trying to represent blacks’ views and beliefs.
 


Some things just don’t seem to change.




Congress is the only institution that can disenfranchise rebels in California and those fools can’t even pass a budget.  However, this shouldn’t be necessary.  The only reason illegal aliens have political clout is because the Census counts them.  That’s how we end up with traitors like Luis Gutierrez in Congress who advocate this third world invasion.    


If Americans are serious about illegal immigration, it will only happen if we convene a convention of States.  We cannot depend on Washington D.C. to correct a problem they created.  We must do it ourselves.  The rule of law and our national sovereignty depend on it.  


Source:






Wednesday, January 29, 2014

Obama's Executive Orders a Means to Squash America's Rebellion




In an interview with Greta Van Susteren, Nancy Pelosi likened Barack Obama’s executive orders to Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation. She believes the president should disregard Congress.  She and her ilk would resort to a totalitarian form of government as long as it advances their agenda.

Should someone remind Princess Pelosi that the Emancipation Proclamation only pertained to those states that seceded from the union?  President Lincoln looked upon Southern slaves as war contraband, that’s why there wasn’t a general emancipation. 


Do Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and the Democratic Party believe the American people are in rebellion?  Are they at war with our republican form of government?  One can easily come to that conclusion when they use this kind of an analogy.







Monday, February 18, 2013

Today's Democrats Are Yesteryear's Tories




Thomas Jefferson once stated, the tree of liberty must be refreshed with the blood of tyrants and patriots, and for all intensive purposes the federal government is preparing for a rebellion.  The Department of Homeland Security has purchased an additional 21.6 million rounds of ammunition to add to their stockpile of 1.6 billion.  This is the same agency that designated liberty loving Americans as “extreme right-wing terrorist.”

Even though a civil war is unthinkable, it’s amazing to witness everyone arming up.  Gun manufacturers can’t keep up with orders and ammunition is hard to come by; in the meantime, Vice President Joe Biden is meddling in the affairs of state governments by pushing Democrats to ban certain weapons and high capacity clips.  Democrats in Wisconsin introduced a bill to ban certain types of ammunition; in the state of Washington they prohibited “assault weapons,” and called for a yearly, warrantless inspection by a sheriff.  Noncompliance is punishable by one year in jail.

Geez, today’s Democrats remind me of yesteryears Tories.  The level of taxation is unbearable.  They’re confiscating property and are trying to disarm the populace.  And by not passing a budget in the Senate, the Democrats have effectively rendered Congress on par with the House of Burgesses in 1769 when King George III disbanded it.  We’re basically in conflict with tyranny once again.

Mark Levin stated that the federal government is preparing for a complete financial meltdown.  The evidence substantiates his claims:

 

The Revolutionary War was also a civil war, neighbor vs. neighbor, Patriots vs. Tories.  This next one will be Patriots vs. Progressives. 





Thursday, August 16, 2012

Small Business Owners Rebel Against White House "Occupiers"

Small business owners are deeply resentful at the dynamic duos who currently “occupy” the White House. Just recently, a baker refused to host ‘Bite Me’ Biden, because of this administrations hostility to entrepreneurs.

A back story has recently been reported. The Washington Examiner published the following:

Secret Service officers associated with Vice President Joe Biden bought a pile of cupcakes from the baker who refused to host Biden at his shop — and they did so out of gratitude.

It’s a startling news nugget at the bottom of a local report. “[S]hortly after Crumb and Get It told Biden’s advance people ‘no’ — the secret service walked in and told [owner] Chris McMurray ”Thanks for standing up and saying ‘no’ — then they bought a whole bunch of cookies and cupcakes,” according to the
Valley Reporter (Va.).

McMurray refused to host the Biden entourage as a protest of Obama’s comment, made in the nearby town of Roanoke, that “if you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that.”

The Secret Service’s purchase proved to be a herald of things to come, as Virginia locals rewarded McMurray with a rush of business this morning. The bakery ran out of food by 1:15 pm.

A discontent is steadily spreading. Here is a sign from another ‘you didn’t build that’ business owner.



Thursday, October 13, 2011

Jesse Jackson Jr. Wants Obama to Declare State of Rebellion



Democrats are in a state of desperation. You can practically smell it. It exudes from every authoritarian pore of their bodies. And that makes them dangerous. So far, we’ve heard calls for suspension of elections. We’ve heard cries for the administration to implement the 14th Amendment in order to raise the debt ceiling. Now, a congressman from Illinois is advocating a dictatorship. Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. wants Obama to declare Congress in a state of rebellion and to use extra-constitutional means through an administrative state to rule over all of us:

“I hope the president continues to exercise extraordinary constitutional means, based on the history of Congresses that have been in rebellion in the past,” Jackson said. “He’s looking administratively for ways to advance the causes of the American people, because this Congress is completely dysfunctional.”


“President Obama tends to idealize — and rightfully so — Abraham Lincoln, who looked at states in rebellion and he made a judgment that the government of the United States, while the states are in rebellion, still had an obligation to function,” Jackson told TheDC at his Capitol Hill office on Wednesday.

“On several occasions now, we’ve seen … the Congress is in rebellion, determined, as Abraham Lincoln said, to wreck or ruin at all costs. I believe … in the direct hiring of 15 million unemployed Americans at $40,000 a head, some more than $40,000, some less than $40,000 — that’s a $600 billion stimulus. It could be a five-year program. For another $104 billion, we bailout all of the states … for another $100 billion, we bailout all of the cities,” he said

Jackson added that his $804 billion stimulus plan is the only way to solve the unemployment crisis. “I support the jobs plan. I support the president’s re-election. I support Barack Obama,” he said. “But at this hour, we need a plan that meets the size and scope of the problem to put the American people to work.”

“We’ve got to go further. I support what [Obama] does. Clearly, Republicans are not going to be for it but if the administration can handle administratively what can be done, we should pursue it. And if there are extra-constitutional opportunities that allow the president administratively to put the people to work, he should pursue every single one of them,” Jackson suggested.


Even if that means Obama declaring himself king for life.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/12/jackson-obama-should-declare-a-national-emergency-add-jobs-with-extra-constitutional-action/#ixzz1aiYp9hcU