Four More Days! Four More Days! Four More Days!

Time to bring it home and rid ourselves of this interloper.

Family Dinner in an Obama Economy

H/T: Maggies Farm

Mitt "The Redeemer" Romney vs. Barack "Pound of Flesh" Obama

We are live in Washington D.C. Here tonight at the home of the Potomac Potlickers where the corruptocrats plot to enslave you and me is the fight for America’s soul. Tonight’s matchup pits a European socialist against a Mormon capitalist. First we introduce the champion.

In the left corner we have a Marxist/Islamophile from the south side of Chicago weighing in at a pound of flesh. He’s a community organizer with no real world experience, but with a know-it-all attitude that overwhelms his opponents. His record is spotty and pathetic. I introduce to you the president of the United States – BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMAAAAAA

In the right corner, we have the challenger, weighing in at a shadow of himself. He’s a former governor and successful businessman who has created thousands of jobs. He’s a professed constitutionalist and advocate for prosperity. Welcome the Mormon from Michigan – MITT “THE REDEEMER” ROMNEYYYYYY

It didn't take long for Obama to deliver the first low blow:

Ouch…that was taken out of context. Obama’s minions blocked the full speech. The Redeemer shakes it off:

This is going to be dirty fight all the way to November folks.

Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/five-key-swing-states-obama-romney-presidential-election-2012-6

Cardinal Dolan Gives Final Benediction to Godless DNC

And everything the Cardinal praised, the delegates of the Democratic Party despised. And here is the proof in the pudding:



Love of God, country and the sanctity of life? I don't think so.

The Democratic Party's Eddie Haskell Convention

Last night, the prime time line up at the Democratic National Convention professed their love of God, country and all things military. They even declared admiration for a decent work ethic. The phrase “pulled up by the bootstraps” was used. I couldn’t believe what I was hearing. For awhile, I thought I was watching a rerun of the RNC.

But of course, this was a ruse. The speakers earlier that day exposed their true selves with the knowledge that no one was watching. They displayed the venom and vitriol against all things American and traditional. They even excluded God from their platform and denied Jerusalem was the capital of Israel. But they got caught. And when they tried to change it back, they booed God.



The 2012 DNC should be proclaimed the Eddie Haskell Convention. These people are shameless sycophants, who privately connive and plot against the traditional values of the American people.

The Charlotte Observer is the MSNBC of Print Journalism

Is the Charlotte Observer the MSNBC of print journalism? Their outlandish cartoon lampooning Paul Ryan as Pinocchio is the kind of bias we’ve come to expect from this dinosaur. What is even more cartoonish, is Taylor Batten – the editor of the Disturber – twisting his panties trying to cover up the failures of his god: Barack Obama.

Here is the first I’ve got your back, Barack spin by Mr. Batten:

The stretch: Ryan said Obama promised to keep a GM plant in Janesville, Wisconsin open, but that plant is now closed. The truth: GM decided to close the plant in December 2008, when George W. Bush was president. And Ryan opposed Obama's GM bailout, which is now widely credited with saving the company and the industry.

The truth is Barack Obama promised those workers the plant would stay open under his presidency. Paul Ryan didn’t make that promise; nor did any other politician. And as for saving GM, that company owes the taxpayers $25 billion; money we will never see again. And who’s to say that another bailout might be needed down the road.



The stretch: Ryan said the Bowles-Simpson debt reduction commission sent Obama "an urgent report" that he then ignored. The truth: Obama certainly ignored Simpson-Bowles. But Ryan himself was on the commission and voted against the Simpson-Bowles plan. The lack of support by Ryan and others on the commission relieved Congress of having to act on it.

The last I checked, Barack Obama is president. It was his commission. Paul Ryan is a lowly congressman. Here is the real reason why Simpson-Bowles wasn’t backed by the president, outlined by Forbes:

The reason Obama didn’t back Simpson-Bowles is much simpler: it’s a big tax hike on the middle class. The President made a campaign promise not to raise taxes on families making $250,000 or less—98 percent of all American families. Though he has signed a couple of bills that violate that promise at the edges (raising the cigarette tax and, arguably, imposing an individual health care mandate) he has made a clear decision that it would be against his political interest to endorse any broad-based income or payroll tax increase on middle-income families. He could not endorse Simpson-Bowles because Simpson-Bowles is unpopular.

Instead, the President has focused on campaigning for tax increases on the wealthy. This is a policy that has the twin advantages of being red meat for his base and popular with a large majority of Americans. Liberals, focused on defending the interests of 99 percent, are not showing any particular appetite for a middle class tax increase, even if it goes to fund programs they value. But they love the idea of taxing rich people more.

Mr. Batten continues on:

The stretch: Ryan referred to "$716 billion, funneled out of Medicare by President Obama," saying it came "at the expense of the elderly." The truth: Obama's cuts to Medicare do not reduce benefits to seniors. They reduce future reimbursement rates to hospitals and insurance plans. And they haven't happened; they take place over 10 years. Ryan included the same cuts in his budget plan. In fact, Ryan's Medicare plan reduces spending on the program more than Obama did.

I’ll let Paul Ryan speak for himself:



The stretch: Ryan blamed Obama for the S&P downgrade of America's credit rating. The truth: The downgrade happened because Republicans in Congress took the nation to the brink over raising the debt ceiling. In its downgrade after that showdown, S&P blamed Republicans in Congress, like Ryan, who "continue to resist any measure that would raise revenues."

Of course, Taylor Batten and the Obamabots at the Charlotte Observer believe the only means of raising revenue is thru taxation. There is not enough money in the world to pay off our debt. But somehow, this paper believes the rich are hoarding all the wealth! And by the way, we raised the debt ceiling. Did it help our credit rating? NO! As a matter of fact, if we don’t do something about the outrageous spending, the U.S. could be downgraded again. Here is the S&P’s reasoning for the 2011 downgrade:

We have lowered our long-term sovereign credit rating on the United States of America to 'AA+' from 'AAA' and affirmed the 'A-1+' short-term rating.

We have also removed both the short- and long-term ratings from CreditWatch negative.

The downgrade reflects our opinion that the fiscal consolidation plan that Congress and the Administration recently agreed to falls short of what, in our view, would be necessary to stabilize the government's medium-term debt dynamics.

More broadly, the downgrade reflects our view that the effectiveness, stability, and predictability of American policymaking and political institutions have weakened at a time of ongoing fiscal and economic challenges to a degree more than we envisioned when we assigned a negative outlook to the rating on April 18, 2011.

Since then, we have changed our view of the difficulties in bridging the gulf between the political parties over fiscal policy, which makes us pessimistic about the capacity of Congress and the Administration to be able to leverage their agreement this week into a broader fiscal consolidation plan that stabilizes the government's debt dynamics any time soon.

The outlook on the long-term rating is negative. We could lower the long-term rating to 'AA' within the next two years if we see that less reduction in spending than agreed to, higher interest rates, or new fiscal pressures during the period result in a higher general government debt trajectory than we currently assume in our base case.

Hey Obama, don’t worry about Charlotte. The Disturber has your back.


Source: http://obsdailyviews.blogspot.com/2012/08/paul-ryan-engaging-fibber.html#storylink=cpy

http://www.forbes.com/sites/joshbarro/2012/02/27/the-real-reason-obama-wouldnt-embrace-simpson-bowles/

http://www.standardandpoors.com/ratings/articles/en/us/?assetID=1245316529563

http://money.cnn.com/2012/06/08/news/economy/us_credit_rating/index.htm

MSNBC Commentators Call Romney and GOP Racist

What is it with MSNBC and their race obsessed commentators? This Toure guy is completely blinded by hate. Tingles is stuck in the 60's. Is everyone off their rocker at this so-called cable news channel?

At least one guest called out these haters.

The Republican Party Puts on the Brass Knuckles

It’s about damn time the Republican Party stood up to the drive-by media and the Democratic Party bullies. For years, we conservatives watched as the milquetoast cowered at baseless accusations. Finally, we have a new generation who won’t stand for these ridiculous accusations of wanting to kill old people, and starve children. This new breed has grown a pair of balls. They have taken off the gloves, and donned brass knuckles. And who knew Mitt Romney had it in him to call out the thugs from Chicago, as reported by the Hill.com:

Romney repeatedly and harshly criticized Team Obama for the remarks.

"His campaign and his surrogates have made wild and reckless accusations that disgrace the office of the Presidency. Another outrageous charge came a few hours ago in Virginia. And the White House sinks a little bit lower," Romney said.

"This is an election in which we should be talking about the path ahead, but you don't hear any answers coming from President Obama’s re-election campaign. That’s because he's intellectually exhausted, out of ideas, and out of energy. And so his campaign has resorted to diversions and distractions, to demagoguing and defaming others. This is an old game in politics; what’s different this year is that the president is taking things to a new low."

And even better:

"Mr. President, take your campaign of division and anger and hate back to Chicago," Romney said while campaigning in Ohio.

Even the RNC has had enough:

And better, they’re calling out the media for their distortions and lies:

No more milquetoast. No more John McCains. No quarter! The fight is on!

Source: http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/243697-romney-comes-out-swinging-against-obama-in-tough-new-speech

North Carolina Blacks Don't Have Obama's Back

Barack Obama’s aspirations for another term are beginning to fray. A reliable constituency is beginning to turn their back on the Anointed One. Business Insider reported the following:

President Barack Obama is rapidly losing support among African-American voters in North Carolina, a new poll out today from the Democratic-leaning Public Policy Polling shows.

The poll finds that Mitt Romney would get 20 percent of the African-American vote if the election were held today, compared with 76 percent for Obama. Overall, Romney has a 48 percent to 46 percent lead on Obama in the crucial swing state.

Does Obama have the backs of the black community? Let’s take a look at the following graph from the Department of Labor:

Doesn’t look like it to me.



Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/barack-obama-african-american-vote-black-north-carolina-2012-6#ixzz1xgGAbTcI

http://www.dol.gov/_sec/media/reports/blacklaborforce/

Obama's Official White House Portrait Should be in Velvet

Can’t the campaigner-in-chief put aside politics for one day? During the portrait unveiling ceremony, honoring former President George W. Bush and his first lady, the Anointed One once again demonstrated his low character.

"The months before I took the oath of office were a chaotic time," Obama said, after explaining that the president's job is isolating, and that he and Bush have a connection since so few have held the job. "We knew our economy was in trouble, our fellow Americans were in pain, but we wouldn't know until later just how breathtaking the financial crisis had been."

Obama did note the Bush tried to get it right. "Still, over those 2 1/2 months, in the midst of that crisis, President Bush, his cabinet, his staff, many of you who are here today, went out of your ways--George, you went out of your way--to make sure that the transition to a new administration was a seamless as possible. President Bush understood that rescuing our economy was not just a Democratic or Republican issue, it was an American priority. I'll always be grateful for that."

When they unveil Obama’s official portrait, I hope it’s in velvet, because that would aptly describe his low character and presidency.



Source: http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/blamer-chief_646332.html

Planned Parenthood is a Federally Protected OutLaw Organization

The arrogance of Planned Parenthood is something to behold. In fiscal year ending June 30, 2008, they received $349.8 million in taxpayer monies. Individual states have tried to deny this organization their citizens’ largess, but federal judges have ruled that this entity has special considerations over all others. And since the courts have conferred special status unto this abortion provider, they feel free to break all sorts of laws. Just recently, Planned Parenthood was busted for promoting gendercide:




Planned Parenthood is a 501 (c) (3) organization. That tax exempt status limits their political activities. Here is an excerpt from the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops website defining what political activities are allowed under a 501 (c) (3):

What does section 501(c)(3) of the IRC say about political campaign activity?Section 501(c)(3) of the IRC prohibits organizations that are exempt from federal income tax under its provisions, including Catholic organizations exempt under the USCCB Group Ruling, from participating or intervening in political campaigns on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office. IRS interprets this prohibition as absolute.


What is the difference between lobbying and political campaign intervention?In the most basic terms, lobbying focuses on legislation, whereas political campaign intervention focuses on candidates and campaigns for election. Lobbying includes both direct lobbying and grassroots lobbying. Direct lobbying means contacting members of a legislative body, whether federal, state, or local, for the purpose of proposing, supporting, or opposing legislation or advocating the adoption or rejection of legislation. Grassroots lobbying means urging members of the public to do the same. Section 501(c)(3) limits the amount of lobbying a Catholic organization can do; it does not prohibit lobbying outright. The lobbying limitation applies both to lobbying that is germane to an organization's tax-exempt purpose and to lobbying that is not. [See: Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(3)(ii); Rev. Rul. 67-293, 1967-2 C.B. 185.]

What kinds of activities are prohibited generally under section 501(c)(3)?Under the rubric participation in or intervention in any political campaign on behalf of or opposition to any candidate for public office, section 501(c)(3) prohibits a range of activities, generally including: statements, in any medium, of support or opposition for any candidate, political party or political action committee (“PAC”); providing or soliciting financial support to or for any candidate, political party or PAC; providing or soliciting in-kind support to or for any candidate, political party or PAC; distribution of voter education materials biased with respect to any candidate, political party or PAC; conduct of public forums, debates or lectures biased with respect to any candidate, political party or PAC; and conduct of voter registration or get-out-the-vote drives biased with respect to any candidate, political party or PAC.



With that in mind, Planned Parenthood has earmarked over $1 million for anti-Romney campaign ads:

(CBS News) The political arm of Planned Parenthood on Wednesday announced a new $1.4 million ad campaign against Mitt Romney, the most ambitious foray into presidential politics for the women's health care organization.

Rolled out simultaneously with Planned Parenthood Action Fund's endorsement of President Obama's re-election bid, the new ad campaign hits the presumptive Republican nominee for his views on women's health issues, calling them "out of touch" and "harmful."

You’d think that Planned Parenthood would lose its tax exempt status after that, but I’m sure they would find another federal judge to confer more special rights and privileges unto this rogue organization.

Source: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/planned-parenthood-got-3496-million-tax-dollars-performed-324008-abortions-paid-its

http://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/about-us/terms-of-use.htm

http://www.usccb.org/about/general-counsel/political-activity-guidelines.cfm#political_campaign_activity_prohibition

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57443671-503544/planned-parenthood-rolls-out-anti-romney-campaign/

http://www.catholic.org/national/national_story.php?id=34946

Joe Biden is All About Giving a Fair Shot and Shake to Obama's Campaign Bundlers

Sometimes you just have to laugh at these buffoons in the Obama administration. Joe Biden made the following statement at a campaign rally in Ohio. His audience was the UAW.

"Simply stated, we're about promoting the private sector," Biden said. "They're about protecting the privileged sector. We are for a fair shot and a fair shake; they're about no rules, no risks and no accountability."

Specifically calling out Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum, Biden said, "If you give any one of these guys the keys to the White House, they will bankrupt the middle class again."

Hey Joe, does promoting the private sector include all of your buddies who received federal government grants and guaranteed loans? You know the ones I’m talking about: The campaign bundlers who financed Obama’s campaign in 2008 and will again in 2012. How about the life-long Democratic operatives who received special Department of Energy dispensations like Robert Kennedy Jr. and Al Gore? Couldn’t we classify these people as your privileged sector?

My God! These people have no shame. If anyone personifies Biden’s no rules, no risks and no accountability maxim, it would be the scoundrels in the Obama administration.

Source: http://nation.foxnews.com/2012-presidential-race/2012/03/15/biden-were-about-promoting-private-sector-theyre-about-protecting-privileged-sector

What's Up Johnny "Cracker" Martin?

Hey cracker. What’s up cracker? My man, cracker.

I doubt that poor, white people will use this as a form of a greeting or term of endearment. It just doesn’t have that zing.

Maybe we should address Politico reporter John Martin in that fashion. He seems to be an expert on all things “cracker”:

Politico reporter Jonathan Martin on Tuesday mocked the "cracker counties" of Florida's conservative Panhandle. Talking to Daily Rundown host Chuck Todd, he derided, "Chuck, a lot of the counties in the Panhandle, in north Florida, the cracker counties, if you will...more resemble Georgia and Alabama than they do Florida."

Hey, Johnny Cracker. What’s up, Cracker John?

Now, that has a zing to it.

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2012/01/31/politicos-jonathan-smears-conservative-florida-voters-cracker-counti#ixzz1l7cNlqLP

E.U. Climate Chief Aghast GOP Presidential Contenders not Worshippers at The Green Church

The European Union’s head climate chief trickster is stunned that republican presidential candidates aren’t buying the crud that global warming worshippers are propagating:

European Union climate chief Connie Hedegaard is disposing of diplomatic niceties when describing U.S. political battles over climate change.

“I’m shocked that the political debate in the U.S. is so far away from the scientific facts,” she said, according to The Copenhagen Post.

“When more than 90 percent of researchers in the field are saying that we have to take [climate change] seriously, it is incredibly irresponsible to ignore it. It’s hard for a European to understand how it has become so fashionable to be anti-science in the U.S.,” Hedegaard said in the Post account, which reprints comments she made to the Danish paper Politiken.

“And when you hear American presidential candidates denying climate change, it’s difficult to take,” she said.

And how many of those 90 percenters are dependent upon the confiscation of other people’s wealth? Who is funding their research and paying their salaries?

We conservatives are aware of Climategate and the demonization of dissident scientist. We are not congregants to the Green Church of Totalitarianism. Or, in consideration of E.U. immigration policy: a mosque.

Source: http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/183901-eu-climate-chief-shocked-at-us-debate