Who are we to judge
when it comes to love? That’s what gay
activist and their liberal accomplices said to conservatives when we opposed
same-sex marriage. Libtards pooh-poohed
our admonitions that the Supreme Court’s ruling would open the door for
polygamy, bestiality and all sorts of perversions that the unstable and mentally
insane can dream up. Well, we warned
you.
The writers at Salon.com
are now the arbiters of what constituents love and marriage. To them, it’s alright if gay people can
marry, but not okay for a conservative to marry two consenting women. Here is their snarky riposte:
Well,
conservatives, here it is, just as you predicted. Human sacrifice, dogs and
cats living together, mass hysteria... And on cue, here comes Nathan Collier —
a man who describes himself on Facebook as “an American, conservative,
Constitutionalist, capitalist, (formerly) Christian, heterosexual middle aged
white male of Southern heritage” — and his lovely two brides Victoria and
Christine, asking for official recognition of their union. Coming soon: Cat
ladies applying for marriage licenses!
And this:
If you want to
argue that polygamy and marriage equality are the same thing, well, they’re
not. If you want respect for how consenting adults arrange their households,
though, you’ve got it. That does not however mean that because one group
that has fought for friggin’ decades for basic recognition and respect finally
has achieved something, that every fringe group — and yeah, sister wife
families, you are fringe — gets a piece of the action too.
Actually, polygamy
has been around for thousands of years from Abraham and Charlemagne right up to
modern day in some cultures. Same-sex marriage
is a recent invention. Polygamists have
more of a claim on marriage than Dick and Harry.
Source:
No comments:
Post a Comment