Rep.
Renee Ellmers, of the 2nd Congressional District of North Carolina, not
only refused to vote for defunding Obama’s executive amnesty, she was the only
republican to vote no on an amendment that would prioritize illegal aliens for
deportation who’ve been convicted of domestic violence, or child
molestation.
Frank Roche, last year’s primary opponent,
called out the congresswoman on her weak stance on immigration. She, of course, lied through her teeth. Ellmer’s latest vote vindicates critics who
called her out.
As Roche points out, Ellmers tried to explain her votes by
saying the bill was "overly broad in scope, as it has the potential to
have a real negative and lasting impact on jobs and families in North
Carolina." She added, "there are businesses in the Second District
who contract with Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and many of
these jobs could be put in jeopardy with the passing of this legislation."
Roche said Ellmers' votes make it clear
to the voters of North Carolina's 2nd district where she stands on the issue of
granting amnesty and work permits to illegal aliens.
In the 2016
GOP primary, if she decides to run, there will be no chance for deception,
mischaracterization, or misleading ads by the Ellmers campaign or her
supporters. She has been outed when it comes to amnesty, immigration, and constitutional
overreach.
Rep. Ellmers was one of only ten
Republicans to vote no on the DHS funding bill on the whole, although only 8
voted no because of the immigration amendments.
Let’s hope she decides not to run. If she wins the primary, I would just as soon
have a democrat take that seat rather than a RINO who doesn’t value American
citizenship.
Source:
No comments:
Post a Comment