Jorge Ramos of Univision is an outspoken advocate
for illegal alien rights. He believes
the U.S. should surrender its sovereignty by having an open border policy. One must ask what kind of an American citizen
would welcome a third world invasion. I’ll
tell you, a person with dual citizenship.
Jorge Ramos is a citizen of both the United States
and Mexico. That is a conflict of
interest. Mind you, Mexico doesn’t allow
dual citizenship within their borders.
They don’t allow illegal immigration, period. But that doesn’t stop Mexico and their agents
from lecturing the U.S. on our illegal alien problem. As a matter of fact, Mexican politicians campaign
within our borders. Mexicans with dual citizenship
vote in both countries elections. Jorge
Ramos openly bragged about this “privilege.”
I’ve never ceased to be Mexican. I
have two passports, and I vote in elections in
both countries. I’m deeply proud of this privileged duality. The best thing about America is its
embrace of diversity.
The worst
thing about America, of course, is the racist and xenophobic attitudes that
tend to emerge now and then — Arizona’s anti-immigrant laws, for example. I
hope that one day soon Americans will treat all immigrants, including the 11
million undocumented residents already living in the United States, with the
same largess that I experienced when I arrived here.
He never ceased to be Mexican. That kind of attitude is dangerous particularly
when one country borders another and especially when a quarter of that country’s
population resides in the other.
Americans are seeing foreigners openly campaign on our soil. The Center for Immigration Studies reported
the following:
Up until 2005 the numbers have not been
as high as the Mexican government study scenario envisioned. However, part of
the reason for this is that Mexican nationals had to return to Mexico in order
to vote. No more. In June 2005, the Mexican government passed a law allowing
absentee voting for its nationals abroad.11 A few days later a story in the New Times carried the headline "Mexican
Expatriates in U.S. Cheer Vote Law."12 There is no doubt that the United
States has and will become more of a campaign arena for foreign governments.
Because the election process also
involves extensive campaigning, this too is a means of reinforcing and
cementing immigrant ties to "home" countries. The Washington Post wrote, "Eager to reach their
countrymen living in the United States, Mexico's two main opposition
presidential candidates are barnstorming through Southern California as if it
were Mexico's 32nd state."13 It
is increasingly the case that the candidates of other countries actively
campaign in the United States for financial and other kinds of support. When
Vicente Fox campaigned for the Mexican presidency, he campaigned in Mexican
communities in the United States.14 In
2000, Francisco Labastida, presidential candidate of the Institutional
Revolutionary Party (PRI), appeared on the Washington
Post'sLive Online, an Internet Q&A, to campaign among his countrymen in
the United States.15
The question remains, who authorized dual
citizenship? The U.S. Constitution specifically
states that only Congress has the authority to set rules for immigration and
naturalization. Did our elected
officials betray the American people with this idiotic policy? The answer is no!
The Supreme Court, once again, took it upon itself, while
completely disregarding the U.S. Constitution, to grant dual citizenship with
the landmark ruling Afroyim v. Rusk. And
what vehicle did this august body use to impose their will upon the American
people? Why the 14th
Amendment of course.
The Supreme Court has enabled this third world
invasion with a series of rulings using the 14th Amendment such as
birthright citizenship with the Wong Kim Ark ruling in 1898 and forcing communities
to educate illegal alien children with another landmark ruling Plyler v. Doe in
1982.
If the United States is to remain a sovereign
nation and adhere to a constitutional form of government, we must deal with the federal judiciary and their rogue vehicle, the 14th
Amendment.
Source:
No comments:
Post a Comment