Millions of Americans instinctively realize something is wrong with Washington D.C. and the federal government in general. We have judges deciding political issues that are way beyond “judicial review” such as gay marriage, immigration and national security. We have bureaucrats imposing rules and regulations that have the weight of law while Congress sits on the sidelines claiming oversight.
Where are the checks and balances? Are there no limitations on what these
unelected judges can do? Why do we need
Congress if bureaucrats are running the show?
And where in the Constitution does it state that the legislative branch
can abrogate their prerogatives to unelected bureaucrats?
I just finished reading Stolen Sovereignty by Daniel
Horowitz and it is an eye opener. I’ve
written about the abuses by the federal courts and bureaucracies in this
blog. I’ve also written about Congress's dereliction of duty. But I didn’t know
the extent of their betrayal. This
federal government has systematically disenfranchised the American people of
its birthright and they’ve done it by conferring power upon the unelected
branches of government.
What I didn’t realize is that Congress has plenary
powers over the federal judiciary. They
can decide the extent of its appellate jurisdiction as dictated in Article III
Section 2. They can tell the courts they
no longer decide issues pertaining to immigration and naturalization, gay
marriage, or even abortion for that matter.
The courts can only decide cases where they have original jurisdiction
as defined in Article III.
This book also details how illegal immigration has
disenfranchised American citizens of their birthright and the damage they’ve
done to our electoral process. You’ll be
extremely pissed when you discover the lie that illegal aliens have due process
rights and that the courts ignored 90 years of precedent.
What I got out of this book is the extent Congress
has abrogated their constitutional responsibilities. But that shouldn’t be a surprise when we have representatives like Nancy Pelosi. I’ll
never forget when she declared she’s not a constitutional scholar when pressed
upon an issue. Well, if you’re not well
versed upon the Constitution, then what in the hell are you doing in Washington
D.C.?
Source:
No comments:
Post a Comment