Proselytizers of man-made global warming always refer to NOAA as a reputable source. Many of us have accused the Obama administration of politicizing these government agencies. The Daily Mail showed the proof in this pudding.
A high-level whistleblower has told this
newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the
sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on
world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate
conference in Paris in 2015.
The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or
‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN
scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising
faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations
fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by
politicians and policy makers.
But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a
top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday
irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.
Why do we always have to refer to foreign publications for the truth?
Source:
No comments:
Post a Comment