I never thought I would read an article in the Washington Post that condemned centralized economies. Most of these rags are infested with unrepentant Marxist. I guess the Venezuelan nightmare has awakened some in the mainstream media. Here is an excerpt from Matt O’Brien’s article:
Venezuela is stuck in a doom loop that's become a death spiral.
Its stores are empty, its people are starving, and its government is to blame. It has tried to repeal the law of supply and demand, and, in the process, eliminated any incentive for businesses to actually sell things. The result is that the country with the largest oil reserves in the world now has to resort to forced labor just to try to feed itself.
It gives new meaning to the revolution devouring its own.
How has it come to this? Well, Venezuela was always going to have a tough time when oil prices fell from $110 to $40 like they did the past two years. That's because it doesn't have an economy so much as an oil exporting business that subsidizes everything by making up 95 percent of the country's total trade revenue. Even then, though, the oil crash has hurt it much more than any other petrostate. To take one example, the International Monetary Fund estimates that Russia's economy will "only" shrink 1.8 percent this year compared to 10 percent for Venezuela. That's the difference between a run-of-the-mill recession and a complete collapse.
And it's entirely man-made. The easiest way to think about this is as a four-stage cycle of doom that begins with inflation, continues to price controls, then shortages, and finally nationalizations. Here's how it works, or rather doesn't.
Mr. O’Brien enumerates the cause and effects of a controlled economy. What is happening in Venezuela is not new which brings us to the old adage: Those who don’t learn from history are condemned to repeat it. Unfortunately for America, we have a political party that romanticizes the Great Depression and is dedicated to a Chavista-esque revolution.